Didn’t have time to write a Haiku because I am so late with this podcast.

The charges were dropped in the Breonna Taylor case. BLM wasn’t quite thrilled with the results.

Christianity is under attack again thanks to Amy Coney Barrett.

And Hunter Biden and sleepy, creepy Joe got some splaining to do.

Ugh, Is This Ever Going to End?

One of three police officers involved in the Louisville, Ky., drug operation that led to the death of Breonna Taylor in March 2020 was indicted Wednesday on criminal charges.

Officer Brett Hankison, who was fired in June, was indicted on three counts of wanton endangerment in the first degree, a Jefferson County grand jury decided Wednesday. Neither the grand jury nor the presiding judge elaborated on the charges.

A warrant has been issued for Hankison’s arrest and a bond is set at $15,000 cash.

No charges were announced against the two other officers involved in the raid — Myles Cosgrove and Sgt. Johnathan Mattingly, who was shot in the leg and underwent surgery after the police operation that resulted in Taylor’s death.

Hankinson faces up to five years on each of three counts if convicted, Cameron said.

Danial Cameron, DA of Kentucky said:

“The decision before my office as the special prosecutor, in this case, was not to decide if the loss of Ms. Taylor’s life was a tragedy. The answer to that is unequivocally, ‘yes,'” Cameron said. “I understand that Breonna Taylor’s death is part of a national story, but the facts and evidence in this case are different than others…

“If we simply act on emotion or outrage, there is no justice,” Cameron said. “Mob justice is not justice. Justice sought by violence is not justice. It just becomes revenge.”

“I believe that the public deserves this information,” Beshear said. “So I previously made what I would call a suggestion to the attorney general, and now I’m making the request that he post online all the information, evidence and facts that he can release without impacting the three felony counts in the indictment issued today.”

He noted that other jurisdictions had similarly released details about high-profile cases.

“Everyone can and should be informed,” he said. “And those that are currently feeling frustration, feeling hurt, they deserve to know more.”

Cameron said Mattingly and Cosgrove were justified under Kentucky law in their use of force after being fired upon by Walker and his office will not pursue criminal charges against them.

“According to Kentucky law, the use of force by Mattingly and Cosgrove was justified to protect themselves. This justification bars us from pursuing criminal charges in Miss Breonna Taylor’s death,” Cameron said.

But Hankison is accused of “blindly” firing his gun, without a threat within line of sight, according to a pretermination letter the police department sent to him in June.

So, with that, let the Tweeting to start riots commence. Linda Sarsour started it off. She hates this country. She wants this country to be destroyed. But the Democrats love her. She Tweeted.

Yeah, that’s inflammatory. She just wants violence to destroy the country. Nothing more. The evidence shows, presented by the black DA, that this was a justified shooting. How do I know? A police officer was actually shot.

Bernice King, daughter of MLK, said:

I actually like this Tweet because it’s true. I mean, no one knew this gal until she was killed. It shows the insensitivity of social media.

Ben Crump, the attorney for the Taylor family and who makes Al Sharpton look like a racial healer Tweeted:

Yeah, those are probably the right charges. A police officer was shot. The police announced their presence even though it was a no-knock warrant. Taylor’s boyfriend shot first. Again, no “justice,” no peace.

Lonita Baker, an attorney for the Taylor family, said:

As the family’s attorney, I’m not surprised she doesn’t understand. The Grand jury heard the evidence. They came up with the charges. No one mentions that a cop was shot. No one mentions that Brianna Taylor was, possibly, involved in drug trafficking with her ex-boyfriend. No one mentions that the black, Democratic, and honest, prosecutor said that this was a justified shooting. Let’s just tear shit up and burn it down.

I watching the news now. In a couple of hours, I’m sure Louisville will be on fire. No one is going to care about the fact, only the narrative.

Here We Go

Newsweek magazine has issued a major correction to an article smearing potential Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett, accusing the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals judge of belonging to a Catholic sect that “inspired” the novel “The Handmaid’s Tale.”

Initially, Newsweek claimed that “People of Praise,” a charismatic Catholic group to which Barrett reportedly belongs, “served as inspiration for Margaret Atwood’s dystopian novel, The Handmaid’s Tale,” adding that female members are forced to report to spiritual superiors known as “handmaids” and that the group stresses that “men have authority over their wives.”

“Members of People of Praise are assigned to personal advisers of the same sex — called a ‘head’ for men and ‘handmaid’ for women, until the rise in popularity of Atwood’s novel and the television series based on it forced a change in the latter,” the outlet reported.  “Atwood herself has indicated that the group’s existence motivated her to write The Handmaid’s Tale, set in the fictional Gilead, where women’s bodies are governed and treated as the property of the state under a theocratic regime.”

The problem:

The People of Praise group are actually just spiritual advisors. It’s not a religion or a cult. It’s like going to a Bible study group.

National Review Online’s David Harsanyi points out, Barrett’s partner’s “authority” must be severely limited, given that her “knuckle-dragging misogynistic religious fanatic husband has only let the poor woman out of the house twice. Once, to serve a 15-year stint as a law professor at a highly prestigious university,” and the other to serve on the 7th Circuit.

Newsweek offered a correction but too little, too late. The story went viral. The correction went as so:

“Correction: This article’s headline originally stated that People of Praise inspired ‘The Handmaid’s Tale’. The book’s author, Margaret Atwood, has never specifically mentioned the group as being the inspiration for her work,” the note read. “A New Yorker profile of the author from 2017 mentions a newspaper clipping as part of her research for the book of a different charismatic Catholic group, People of Hope. Newsweek regrets the error.”

“The clipping includes a spokesperson for the People of Hope sect based in Newark, New Jersey saying, ‘We’re all Roman Catholics. We differ in the sense that we are a Charismatic group, which would mean that we have prayer meetings, during which there is raising of hands, singing and speaking in tongues,’” the outlet notes. “People of Praise has never had a presence in the state of New Jersey.”

Actress Patricia Heaton, an actress and a Catholic, Tweeted:

Democratic Senator, Joe Machin from West Virginia also stated the same thing on Fox News. He said:

“I’m Catholic, OK. And religion should not enter into it. It sure doesn’t with me. The freedom of religion is one of the basic rights we all have as an American citizen. Whether you’re Catholic, whether you’re Protestant, whether you’re Jewish, evangelical, whatever it may be, God bless you. You worship who you want and you worship how you want. You worship the same God. All of us do.”

This attack on someone because of their religion is disgusting. And notice it is only Christianity and Judaism that are attacked? No one attacks Islam, right? No one says anything to Rashida Talib and Ilhan Omar who are both ardently anti-Semitic. The reason is because these are the main religions in the country and they typically love the United States and all its principles. Hell, the principles of the Constitution and Declaration of Independence are from Judeo-Christian teachings. Islam is based on hate for infidels. Now I’m not saying all Muslims believe in this. I used to live with Muslims and they were very fine people. They even voted for Trump over Clinton. But most terrorism across the world is done by radical Islamic terrorists. The Left sees them as heroes because the hate America and Israel.

The Left also embraces Marxism and communism. Marx called religion, “Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people”. The ideologies require that the people see the government as god (North Korea is an example of that). Religion gets in the way. It gets in the way because if people have faith that there is something beyond this world, the government becomes less important and fallible because the religious know government is run by people. Religion also establishes individuality and community instead of zombie collectivism (I am talking about Judeo-Christian religions specifically, not Islam). It encourages the use of reason and promotes individual rights. Marxism and communism can have none of that.

Finally, the Left will attack her religion for the simplest of reasons: they have nothing else on Barrett or Barbara Logoa for that matter.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/absolute-embarrassment-news-outlets-slammed-for-publishing-anti-catholic-bigotry-against-amy-coney-barrett
https://www.dailywire.com/news/newsweek-forced-to-issue-major-retraction-after-it-smears-amy-coney-barrett-claims-she-belongs-to-sect-that-inspired-the-handmaids-tale
https://www.dailywire.com/news/patricia-heaton-warns-be-prepared-for-an-onslaught-of-anti-catholic-hate-ahead-of-scotus-nomination
https://www.dailywire.com/news/dem-senator-joe-manchin-condemns-anti-catholic-attacks-on-amy-coney-barrett

Uh-Oh! This Ain’t Gonna Be Good for Sleepy, Creepy Joe!

This story is from Fox News.

The Senate Homeland Security and Finance Committees on Wednesday released an interim report on their months long joint investigation into Hunter Biden’s role on the board of Ukrainian natural gas firm Burisma Holdings and his alleged “extensive and complex financial transactions.”

Homeland Security Committee Chairman Ron Johnson, R-Wis., and Finance Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, said their investigation has “faced many obstacles” from Democrats on their committees and that executive agencies “failed to comply with document requests.”

So this was what was found in the report:

Obama administration officials “knew” that Hunter Biden’s position on the board of Burisma was “problematic” and that it interfered “in the efficient execution of policy with respect to Ukraine.”

“This investigation has illustrated the extent to which officials within the Obama administration ignored the glaring warning signs when the vice president’s son joined the board of a company owned by a corrupt Ukrainian oligarch,” the report’s executive summary stated.

Ironically, Hunter Biden’s job was to clean up corruption from the company. Of course, he knew nothing about energy adn couldn’t speak the language. Then his father bragged about getting the attorney, who was investigating Burisma, fired. Ukraine did because they wanted a billion dollars in U.S. aid.

The Senate committees also revealed in the report that they obtained records from the U.S. Treasury Department, which “show potential criminal activity relating to transactions among and between Hunter Biden, his family, and his associates with Ukrainian, Russian, Kazakh and Chinese nationals.”

The committees stated that they received records that Hunter Biden “sent thousands of dollars” to individuals who have “either been involved in transactions consistent with possible human trafficking; an association with the adult entertainment industry; or potential association with prostitution.”

“Some recipients of those funds are Ukrainian or Russian citizens,” the report states, adding that “the records note that it is a documented fact that Hunter Biden has sent funds to non-resident alien women in the United States who are citizens of Russia and Ukraine and who have subsequently wired funds they have received from Hunter Biden to individuals located in Russia and Ukraine.”

“The records also note that some of these transactions are linked to what ‘appears to be an Eastern European prostitution or human trafficking ring,’” the report stated.

Oops! This is a big deal and shows that some of Hunter’s indiscretions over the years (you know; smoking crack, attending strips clubs, getting a hooker pregnant) is habitual.

The report states that Senate investigators found millions of dollars in “questionable financial transactions” between Hunter Biden and his associates and foreign individuals, including the wife of the former mayor of Moscow as well as individuals with ties to the Chinese Communist Party.

According to the report, an investment firm co-founded by Hunter Biden, Rosemont Seneca Thornton, “received $3.5 million in a wire transfer” from Elena Baturina, the wife of the former mayor of the Russian capital.

Wow! This is huge. And it’s Trump that’s in cahoots with Russia? Just a little reminder: We had two had a two year investigation on Trump-Russia collusion because Russia post $100,000 in ads on Facebook and Twitter. Meanwhile, the son of the Vice President, Joe Biden, is getting $3.5 million from the wife of the mayor of Moscow. The hunter must have some awesome equipment to get all this money from these women.

The report goes further and alleges that not just Hunter Biden but other members of the Biden family “were involved in a vast financial network that connected them to foreign nationals and foreign governments across the globe.”

In one instance, the report stated that Hunter Biden “opened a bank account” with a Chinese national linked to China’s communist government, which “financed a $100,000 global spending spree” for the former vice president’s brother, James Biden, and his wife, Sara Biden.

Biden campaign spokesman Andrew Bates on Wednesday blasted the investigation, and Johnson directly, for pursuing a “conspiracy theory.”

“As the coronavirus death toll climbs and Wisconsinites struggle with joblessness, Ron Johnson has wasted months diverting the Senate Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs Committee away from any oversight of the catastrophically botched federal response to the pandemic, a threat Sen. Johnson has dismissed by saying that ‘death is an unavoidable part of life.’ Why? To subsidize a foreign attack against the sovereignty of our elections with taxpayer dollars — an attack founded on a long-disproven, hardcore rightwing conspiracy theory that hinges on Sen. Johnson himself being corrupt and that the Senator has now explicitly stated he is attempting to exploit to bail out Donald Trump’s re-election campaign.”

As usual, it’s Trump’s fault. This bullshit narrative is done. This is going to come up in a debate. Hunter is going to come up. Biden’s 47 years of service with nothing accomplished is going to come up. Joe’s weird behavior with little girls is going to come up. And Joe ain’t going to have a teleprompter.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/senate-committees-report-hunter-biden-burisma-probe
https://www.dailywire.com/news/breaking-hunter-biden-received-millions-from-wife-of-ex-moscow-mayor-paid-suspects-allegedly-tied-to-trafficking-had-contacts-with-chinese-military-senate-report-alleges

Trump is getting another Supreme Court justice.

The Left is flipping out about it.

People are not thinking this election is going to be legit…what a surprise.

And Bill Barr continues to be a stud.

The Path is Open

Sen. Mitt Romney said on Tuesday that he supports the Senate in moving forward with a Supreme Court nominee from President Trump ahead of the presidential election, further tipping the nomination math in favor of Republicans who want to replace the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg with a conservative.

“My decision regarding a Supreme Court nomination is not the result of a subjective test of ‘fairness’ which, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder. It is based on the immutable fairness of following the law, which in this case is the Constitution and precedent. The historical precedent of election year nominations is that the Senate generally does not confirm an opposing party’s nominee but does confirm a nominee of its own.”

“The Constitution gives the President the power to nominate and the Senate the authority to provide advice and consent on Supreme Court nominees. Accordingly, I intend to follow the Constitution and precedent in considering the President’s nominee. If the nominee reaches the Senate floor, I intend to vote based upon their qualifications.”

“We may have a court that has a more conservative bent. But my liberal friends have over many decades gotten used to the idea of having a liberal court. And that’s not written in the stars.”

“It’s also appropriate for a nation that’s if you will center-right to have a court which reflects center-right points of view. Which again are not changing the law from what it states but instead following the law and following the Constitution.”

Romney was a big question. He voted this year…yes, this year…voted to remove Trump on one of the impeachment charges and has shown to have a very iffy relationship with President Trump (though he has voted for the President’s policies over 90% of the time). He has also been seen protesting (not rioting) with the BLM movement earlier this year. I’m not sure why he does the things he does. When he ran against Obama in 2012, sleepy, creepy Joe Biden told a black audience that Romney would “put them back in chains.”

Chuck Grassley also said he would vote for the Trump nominee. He was kind of on the fence because he said, earlier, that he did not think it was a good idea to nominate a justice before an election. He got over it. When someone pointed out what he said, he just waved it off. This should be a lesson to us all: Don’t say things that may require you to do the opposite when the tables are turned. Just be quiet or do not say “never” to anything. Or, be a politician and just change your mind.

With Romney and Grassley going with the President, there are now enough votes to confirm Trump’s Supreme Court nominee.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/mitt-romney-says-he-supports-moving-ahead-with-trump-supreme-court-nominee

The Quiet Part Out Loud

I don’t know when CNN is going to admit they are nothing more than opinion TV like Fox News and MSNBC. They really are fooling themselves in believing they are neutral.

With the clarity that the Supreme Court seat is going to be filled by a Trump pick, Don Lemon flipped out and said what we all knew he thought but never said before. It was such a rant that Chris Cuomo, who’s probably not going to be on CNN much longer, seemed very uncomfortable, actually disagreeing with him.

Listen:

Let’s unpack a little of Don’s temper tantrum.

• Blowing up the system is what the Left has always intended. It’s already happening.
• The electoral college has nothing to do with minority rule. It’s there to make sure that the majority doesn’t become tyrannical. It’s to make sure that states that don’t have a population like California and New York don’t control the country. In other words, states like Wyoming have a say in our government.
• Cuomo is right. Can’t believe I said that. It requires a Constitutional amendment and that’s not going to happen.
• Stacking the courts is also difficult. It require the House to come up with a law, the Senate to ratify it and the President to sign it into law. Good luck with that.
• The Left is trying to destroy the country to keep and never lose power. They cheat.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/cnns-don-lemon-suggests-to-blow-up-the-entire-system-get-rid-of-electoral-college-stack-the-courts

This Says Something

According to Yahoo News:

Just 22 percent of Americans believe this year’s presidential election will be “free and fair,” according to a new Yahoo News/YouGov poll — a disturbing loss of confidence in the democratic process that could foreshadow a catastrophic post-election period with millions of partisans refusing to accept the legitimacy of the results.

The survey, which was conducted from Sept. 15 to 17, found that both Republicans and Democrats harbor grave and growing doubts about whether the upcoming election will accurately reflect the will of the people.

Half of Trump supporters (50 percent) say the election will not be free and fair; more than a third of Biden supporters (37 percent) agree. Overall, the number of Americans who say the election will not be free and fair (46 percent) is more than twice the number who say the opposite. Another third (32 percent) say they’re not sure what to expect.

https://news.yahoo.com/new-yahoo-news-you-gov-poll-less-than-a-quarter-of-americans-think-the-2020-election-will-be-free-and-fair-193758996.html

He’s the Man…Again!

The Department of Justice (DOJ) on Monday identified New York City, Portland and Seattle as “local governments that are permitting anarchy, violence, and destruction in American cities,” a move that comes as the federal government continues to take a tough stance against localized rioting in some areas of the country.

President Trump earlier this month targeted those three cities in a memo to Attorney General William Barr and the Office of Management and Budget asking for a review of federal funding to “anarchist” jurisdictions. The DOJ memo Monday essentially serves as notice that New York City, Portland and Seattle meet the criteria Trump set out for potential defunding.

It’s unclear whether and how much funding may eventually be withdrawn from the cities and if such a move would be legal, as it would likely be challenged in the courts.

William Barr is quoted as saying:

“When state and local leaders impede their own law enforcement officers and agencies from doing their jobs, it endangers innocent citizens who deserve to be protected, including those who are trying to peacefully assemble and protest. We cannot allow federal tax dollars to be wasted when the safety of the citizenry hangs in the balance. It is my hope that the cities identified by the Department of Justice today will reverse course and become serious about performing the basic function of government and start protecting their own citizens.”

In a joint statement, Mayors Bill de Blasio of New York, Jenny Durkan of Seattle and Wheeler called threats to revoke federal funding “thoroughly political and unconstitutional.”

A quote from the statement:

“The President is playing cheap political games with Congressionally directed funds. Our cities are bringing communities together; our cities are pushing forward after fighting back a pandemic and facing the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression, all despite recklessness and partisanship from the White House. What the Trump Administration is engaging in now is more of what we’ve seen all along: shirking responsibility and placing blame elsewhere to cover its failure.”

Now, I think this is a good move but there are a lot of legal hurdles. First, are the finance the federal government giving the cities required or discretionary? If the money is discretionary, then the cities have no say. The money has not been given through law or edict and the federal government can just say “no.” If it is money that is distributed through law, then the DOJ cannot just stop payments being given. This is where things get kind of sticky for the federal government.

I find it funny that Leftists like Wheeler De Blasio and Durkan keep yelling “unconstitutional” when they don’t get their way. The reality is that this is not unconstitutional. It might be against the law but the federal government has no constitutional commitment to finance states or cities. I find it amazing that the people who want to destroy the Constitution are the ones that scream “unconstitutional” every time they don’t get their way. Here’s an idea: these guys should actually read the Constitution. Their behavior tells me they know nothing about it.

Another thing that kicks my cat is that these cities have run themselves into the ground and depend on federal funds. When the local or state government does not do all that it needs to protect citizens and property and actually lowers safety and quality of life, why should the federal government give anything? The government only has two things to do: protect citizens rights and protect the citizens themselves. If a city or state refuses to do that, they should get nothing.

Finally, why just New York City, Seattle and Portland? How about Baltimore, Chicago and Los Angeles? How about Detroit, Washington DC, Minneapolis and Atlanta? I’m pretty sure the DOJ could have found one or two more cities that are having serious issues with law enforcement.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/breaking-ag-barr-to-officially-designate-3-u-s-cities-as-anarchist-jurisdictions-report-says
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/doj-nyc-other-cities-an-anarchist-jurisdiction

Biden Boofs

The Dems call for war.
A new justice is coming.
The top picks are great.

It’s Coming

President Trump said he would nominate a Supreme Court pick on Friday or Saturday and has five women under consideration, as Senate Republicans lined up behind him and Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R., Ky.) and rejected Democrats’ calls to let the winner of the presidential election make the pick.

He said that he would wait until the end of the week out of respect for Ruth Bader Ginsberg. But he would nominate one and it would be quick.

Trump said of Fox and Friends on Monday:

“We won the election and elections have consequences. We have plenty of time.”

He is absolutely correct. Here’s the thing: Trump is President for four years not three and a half. He is expected to do what his voters expect him to do and fight for it. One of the things his voters expect him to do is put in place judges including Supreme Court judges. This goes the same for Mitch McConnell. His voters trust him to do the right thing and that includes fighting for what they want. There’s a reason he has been in the Senate for a thousand years. What he did in 2015 with Merrick Garland and is doing now is not hypocrisy. It’s politics. Unlike a lot of Republicans, McConnell is following the law and fighting politically.

Do you know why we know he is following the law? People are threatening his life and are rioting. The Supreme Court justice that Trump picks is going to get confirmed. And the Left is already flipping.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-says-hell-make-supreme-court-nomination-friday-or-saturday-11600691095?mod=hp_lead_pos5

This Ain’t the First Time

The Democrats are screaming that this is hypocrisy and an outrage and evil and the end of democracy and whatever. The Wall Street Journal said that the confirmation of Supreme Court ran into issues because of what the Democrats have done in the last twenty years.

Let’s look at some of the things they have done:

In 1987, Robert Bork was a qualified nominee for the Supreme Court. The Ted Kennedy, a drunk, sexist and a murderer, called Bork a murderer who would force “back ally abortions” and would make blacks “sit at segregated lunch counters.” Robert Bork was not confirmed. That’s when the term “borked” came into play. That is when a justice is undermined as not to be confirmed.

Clarence Thomas, the day before his confirmation vote, was accused of sexual harassment. This guy was a judge for twenty years. And it seemed that Anita Hill actually sexually harassed him. He didn’t put up with it and fought it. Listen:

Clarence Thomas is a black man. So, apparently, race is not an issue with the Democrats. It’s philosophy. Wait till Trump selects Amy Coney Barret.

Samuel Alito was accused of being a sexist and racist because of some fraternity he belonged to at Princeton.

We won’t even talk about the gang rapist, Brett Kavanaugh, which you probably know about.

Democrats have also filibustered and blocked appellate nominees by Republican Presidents such as:

• Miguel Estrada
• Priscilla Owen
• Janice Rogers Brown
• Charles Pickering Sr.
• Henry Saad
• Carolyn Kuhl
• William Pryor
• David McKeague
• Richard Griffin
• William Meyeres
• Amoung others

This was something unheard of thirty years ago and all of it is by Democrats.

In 2013,

Democrats rewrote Senate rules in mid-Congress, on a party-line vote, to add three seats to the D.C. Circuit. The goal was to stack that court with liberals who would rubber stamp Mr. Obama’s “pen” and “phone” regulatory diktats.

None of this stuff happened to Democratic appointees:

• Elena Kagan, who was far Left, got 60% of the Senate votes.
• Sonia Sotomayor, who is far Left, got over 60% of the Senate votes.
• Ruth Bader Ginsberg, who was far Left, won the vote 93-3!

Is it a surprise that now, that Democrats have no options, they are threatening violence? Here’s the thing: we cannot assume that the Democrats have any good attentions. We have to assume they are there to tear the government apart and rebuild it so that there is no oversight and they can do what they want.

Is it a coincidence they are the party of:

• Mail-in balloting.
• Eliminating the electoral college.
• No voter ID.
• Allow 16-year-olds to vote.
• Allow criminals to vote.
• Packing the Supreme and appellate courts.
• Ending the filibuster.
• Adding states to the Union.
• Impeachment
• Refusing to to condemn rioting and domestic terrorist groups like Antifa and BLM.

So why shouldn’t Republicans man-up and nominate someone? It is time to start fighting. I don’t mean through violence but we shouldn’t be afraid of that either. The Second Amendment is exactly for this.

I’m sure this is going to come up again later.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/breaking-judicial-norms-a-history-11600639835?mod=opinion_lead_pos1

So, Who Are the Top Picks?

The lead candidate for the Supreme Court seat is Amy Coney Barrett but she is closely followed by another judge, Barbara Lagoa. I, personally, would like to see Amy Coney Barrett though Logoa would be a solid pick too. I just think Barrett holds the same family and religious values. I must confess, though, I don’t know much about Barbara Logoa.

So let’s take a look at the two. First, let’s talk about Amy Coney Barrett:

• Amy Coney Barrett was born on January 28, 1972. Hoe depressing, she’s younger than me.
• She is the oldest of seven children. Her father was an attorney and her mother was a homemaker.
• In 1994, she graduated magna cum laude with a BA in English from Rhodes College. That’s my degree.
• She received a full scholarship to Notre Dame Law School and was the executive editor of the Notre Dame Law Review publication.
• In 1997, she graduated first in her class.
• After graduating from law school, Barrett served as a law clerk to Judge Laurence Silberman of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.^[14] She then spent a year as a clerk to Associate Justice Antonin Scalia of the Supreme Court of the United States.^[14] During both clerkships, she was the only female law clerk.
• From 1999 to 2002, she practiced law at Miller, Cassidy, Larroca & Lewin in Washington, D.C.
• Barrett served as a visiting associate professor and John M. Olin Fellow in Law at the George Washington University Law School for a year before returning to her alma mater, Notre Dame Law School.
• In 2002, Barrett returned to Notre Dame Law School to teach federal courts, constitutional law, and statutory interpretation. Barrett was named a Professor of Law in 2010, and from 2014 to 2017 held the Diane and M.O. Miller Research Chair of Law.^[17] Her scholarship focuses on constitutional law, originalism, statutory interpretation, and stare decisis.
• While a full-time faculty member at Notre Dame, Barrett was affiliated with Faculty for Life, a pro-life group at the school. In 2015, she signed a joint letter to Catholic bishops that affirmed the Church’s teachings, including “the value of human life from conception to natural death”, and that family and marriage are “founded on the indissoluble commitment of a man and a woman”.
• President Donald Trump nominated Barrett on May 8, 2017, to serve as a United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
• A hearing on Barrett’s nomination before the Senate Judiciary Committee was held on September 6, 2017.^[27] During Barrett’s hearing, Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein questioned Barrett about whether her Catholic faith would influence her decision-making on the court, because in 1998 Barrett wrote an article in which she argued that Catholic judges should in some cases recuse themselves from death penalty cases due to their moral objections to the death penalty.^[28] Worried that Barrett would not uphold Roe v. Wade given her Catholic beliefs, Feinstein followed Barrett’s response by saying, “the dogma lives loudly within you, and that is a concern.”
• On October 5, 2017, the Senate Judiciary Committee voted 11–9 on party lines to recommend Barrett and report her nomination to the full Senate.^[41][42] On October 30, the Senate invoked cloture by a vote of 54–42.^[43] The Senate confirmed her by a vote of 55–43 on October 31, with three Democrats—Joe Donnelly, Tim Kaine, and Joe Manchin—voting for her.^[11] She received her commission on November 2.
• She is married to Jesse Barrett, also a lawyer.
• She has seven kids: 5 of her own and two adopted from Haiti. Her youngest child has special needs.
• She is a Roman Catholic.

I like her. And my feelings are confirmed when Dianne Feinstein and Dick Durbin don’t like her. By the way, her religion is the only line of attack the Democrats have on her. This ain’t going to be a great attack.

Now, let’s look at Barbara Logoa:

• Barbara Logoa was born on Novenmber 2, 1967 in Miami, Florida to Cuban American parents.
• She is the daughter of parents who fled from Cuba following the Revolution and the assumption of power by Fidel Castro.
• Lagoa earned a Bachelor of Arts, cum laude, in 1989 from Florida International University, where she majored in English.
• She received her Juris Doctor from Columbia Law School in 1992; while at Columbia, she was an Associate Editor of the Columbia Law Review.
• In 2000, Lagoa was one of a dozen mostly pro bono lawyers who represented the Miami family of Elián González.
• In 2003, she became an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, working in the Civil, Major Crimes, and Appellate Sections.
• Lagoa was appointed to the Third District Court of Appeal by Governor Jeb Bush in June 2006 and became Chief Judge on January 1, 2019.
• On January 9, 2019, she was appointed to the Supreme Court of Florida by Governor Ron DeSantis.
• In April 2019, Lagoa wrote for the unanimous court when it found that Governor DeSantis acted within his authority by suspending Sheriff Scott Israel for his response to the Stoneman Douglas High School shooting.
• In November 2019, Lagoa participated in oral arguments concerning an advisory opinion on whether the governor could require those felons that voters had re-enfranchised through 2018 Florida Amendment 4 to pay fines before being allowed to vote.
• On September 12, 2019, President Trump announced his intent to nominate Lagoa to a seat on the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.^[19] On October 15, 2019, her nomination was sent to the Senate.
• She is married to lawyer Paul C. Huck Jr., and her father-in-law is United States District Judge Paul Huck.
• Lagoa and her husband have three daughters, including a set of twins.
• Lagoa is a practicing Roman Catholic who cites Catholic education as instilling “an abiding faith in God that has grounded me and sustained me through the highs and lows of life.”

So these ladies are pretty awesome. There are differences though. Let’s look at them:

• Amy Coney Barrett and Barbara Logoa are both Catholics but Barrett belongs to some rather orthodox Catholic organizations. This could be a problem for her.
• Logoa is a Cuban American. Barrett is white but she does have two adopted Haitian kids. Logoa will reach for the Hispanic community, especially in Florida, while Barrett will get props from the black community.
• Logoa is far more experienced as a judge but also has written some controversial opinions in Florida including about the criminal voting laws. Barrett not so much.
• Barrett is more likely to overturn Roe v. Wade. Logoa is anti-communist and is likely to vote for big government.
• They are both textualists.
• Neither probably ran a rape ring. So there’s that.

They are both extremely qualified to be a Supreme Court justice. Neither should have an issue being confirmed. Neither is going to be a big impact on Roe v. Wade. I think both would be fantastic. Barbara Logoa though might have a bigger impact on preventing the expansion of government.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/barbara-lagoa-gets-buzz-as-possible-trump-supreme-court-nominee-because-of-florida-ties
https://www.wsj.com/articles/amy-coney-barrett-is-again-a-top-contender-for-supreme-court-nomination-11600644990?mod=hp_lead_pos2
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbara_Lagoa

Can you think of something worse that could happen in 2020 that might cause more violence and a possible civil war?

Can you think of something else that would flip the media out?

Can you think of something else that could get Donald Trump impeached again before the election in November?

Well, I can. Ruth Bader Ginsberg died, opening up a seat on the Supreme Court. And Trump plans to fill it with a conservative before the election. That should do it.

Let’s talk about the notorious RBG, her life and the reaction to her death…and the Left’s overreaction.

Her Life

• Born on March 15, 1933 in Brooklyn, New York as Joan Ruth Bader.
• She had a sister who died when she was a baby a her mother died when she was 17.
• She received a bachelor’s degree from Cornell University.
• She married Martin Ginsberg before attending Harvard Law School.
• She transferred to Columbia Law School where she graduated first in her class.
• She was a professor at Rutgers Law School and Columbia Law School.
• Ginsburg spent a considerable part of her legal career as an advocate for gender equality and women’s rights, winning multiple arguments before the Supreme Court.
• She advocated as a volunteer attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union and was a member of its board of directors and one of its general counsels in the 1970s.
• In 1980, President Jimmy Carter appointed her to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, where she served until her appointment to the Supreme Court.
• President Bill Clinton nominated Ginsburg as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court on June 14, 1993, to fill the seat vacated by retiring Justice Byron White.
• Her hisband died in 2010.
• She has two children, James and Jane.
• She has struggled with cancer. She has had colon cancer, a cancerous tumor in her lungs and pancreatic cancer (which she could not beat).

I do not like her politics but neither did Anthony Scalia. But they were best friends in the court going to lunches and operas together.

Reactions

Trump found out about Ginsberg’s death before he took a flight back to Washington from a campaign rally. His reaction was classy. Listen:

He also released a statement:

“Today, our Nation mourns the loss of a titan of the law. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg served more than 27 years as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States—notably just the second woman to be appointed to the Court. She was a loving wife to her late husband, Martin, and a dedicated mother to her two children.

Renowned for her brilliant mind and her powerful dissents at the Supreme Court, Justice Ginsburg demonstrated that one can disagree without being disagreeable toward one’s colleagues or different points of view. Her opinions, including well-known decisions regarding the legal equality of women and the disabled, have inspired all Americans, and generations of great legal minds.

A fighter to the end, Justice Ginsburg battled cancer, and other very long odds, throughout her remarkable life. Our thoughts and prayers are with the Ginsburg family and their loved ones during this difficult time. May her memory be a great and magnificent blessing to the world.”

Joe Biden also made a statement:

Not real classy. She just died and Biden is already politicizing this. But he isn’t the only one.

Mitch McConnell said he would waste no time getting a nominee through the Senate.

Chuck Schumer Tweeted:

Maisy Hirono of Hawaii Tweeted:

Senator Chris Murphy Tweeted:

And, of course, media -whore AoC had to stick her nose in it:

I’m not really sure what AoC means by this. She is a Congressman and really has no say in the vote for a Justice of the Supreme Court. Sounds kind of like a threat. Either way, it doesn’t seem very honoring of a hero to the Left.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/trump-gives-classy-statement-on-ginsburgs-passing-avoids-politics-unlike-top-democrats
https://www.dailywire.com/news/watch-trump-reacts-to-justice-ginsburgs-passing-says-she-led-an-amazing-life

How is the Left reacting?

Crazy. That’s how they are reacting. Listen to this from the YouTube channel, Mr. Reagan:

Yep, that happened. If you think the audio is funny, watch the video. It’s ridiculous. The commentary is pretty good too. But Not all of the reaction from the Left is as funny as this. Some of it is just plain scary.

Reza Azlan Tweeted:

Laura Bassett Tweeted:

Katie Herzog Tweeted:

Emmett MacFarlane Tweeted:

Dr. Jessie Christiansen Tweeted.

I guess the doc here has been hiding her head in sand for the last four months because every one has been rioting.

Beau Willimon Tweeted:

Amy Brown Tweeted:

There were many more with the same vitriol. Now I do want to point out that none of these people has been suspended or flagged for what are obvious threats of violence. Trump Tweets a video about a doctor saying that hydroxy chloroquine and his account is suspended.

These people have been protesting and for four years. Nothing Trump does is going to be accepted by the Leftist nut jobs. We had lowest unemployment and the fastest rising economy in history. Trump ended ISIS and killed two of the most viscous terrorists in the Middle East. He brought Iran and North Korea to heel and had a major peace deal between Israel, Baharian and the UAE with more countries ready to join the table.

So why should Trump care if he does something else that’s going to piss off the Left.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/dems-pledge-ongoing-protests-over-rbg-replacement-target-mitch-mcconnells-homes-in-dc-ky
https://www.dailywire.com/news/trump-tweets-support-for-confirming-new-supreme-court-justice-before-election
https://www.dailywire.com/news/media-figures-threaten-riots-if-gop-tries-to-fill-scotus-seat-burn-it-all-down
https://www.dailywire.com/news/you-killed-rbg-leftists-attack-couple-who-had-supreme-court-justice-officiate-their-august-wedding

What I Think

I have some thought about this:

The media and their brood are saying that this is hypocrisy since McConnell wouldn’t give a vote for Merrick Garland, an Obama appointee. It isn’t hypocrisy, it’s politics. And McConnell had every right to do it.

Forty-five days might not seem like a very long time to push this pick through but it isn’t. Especially if Trump picks who I think he’s going to pick.

And who do I think he is going to pick? Amy Comey Barratt. She is a brilliant jurist, conservative, religious and only 40 years old. Also, it is unlikely anybody is going to accuse her of being a gang rapist.

The riots will continue and get worse. The violence will build. People will die. Anyone with a MAGA hat on or whose politics are right of Left will be threatened. This is why Trump and McConnell shouldn’t give a damn about what these people think. They’re crazy and the crazy isn’t going to go away just because he delays the pick.

Ted Cruz also made a very important point. This is going to be a contentious election. Having a split Supreme Court (there are only eight now) is probably not a great idea.

Barr sticks his neck out.
Our children don’t know what?
Rioters should fear.

Get That Guy Out There

Sounds like Attorney General William Barr, who is normally very soft-spoken, has finally had enough.

When asked about whether or not President Trump would leave the White House if he loses the election, Barr snapped:

“You know liberals project. You know the president is going to stay in office and seize power and all that s—? I’ve never heard of that crap. I mean, I’m the attorney general. I would think I would have heard about it.”

Barr also showed his concern about the country heading to a “mob rules” type of governance, saying:

“Increasingly, the message of the Democrats appears to be ‘Biden or no peace’. As an attorney general, I’m not supposed to get into politics. But…I think we are getting into a position where we’re going to find ourselves irrevocably committed to a socialist path. And I think if Trump loses this election — that will be the case.”

Barr also expressed concern with the way the election may go, saying:

“Just think about the way we vote now. You have a precinct, your name is on a list, you go in and say who you are, you go behind a curtain, no one is allowed to go in there to influence you, and no one can tell how you voted. All of that is gone with mail-in voting.

“There’s no more secret vote with mail-in vote. A secret vote prevents selling and buying votes. So now we’re back in the business of selling and buying votes. And the capricious distribution of ballots means harvesting, undue influence, outright coercion, paying off a postman, here’s a few hundred dollars, give me some of your ballots.”

When asked about Democrats accuse Trump of trying to manipulate the vote, couldn’t have disagreed more. He said it was the Democrats who were actually manipulating the vote and election night could be a disaster.

“They’re creating an incendiary situation where there will be loss of confidence in the vote,” Barr claimed. “It’ll be a close vote. People will say the president just won Nevada. ‘Oh, wait a minute! We just discovered 100,000 ballots! Every vote will be counted!’ Yeah, but we don’t know where these freaking votes came from.”

I like when Barr does these interviews. He is so soft spoken, calm and controlling of what he says, he brings calm to a chaotic administration. If I were Trump and the Trump campaign, I would send Barr out to organizations like CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS and like because he is the best salesman for Trump without actually looking like a cheer leader.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/barr-rumors-trump-crap
https://www.dailywire.com/news/barr-unloads-on-media-a-collection-of-liars-overwhelming-majority-dont-have-integrity

This is Disturbing

According to the Daily Wire:

A surprisingly high number of young Americans polled nationwide displayed profound ignorance about the Holocaust, with a sizable percentage even believing that Jewish people were responsible for it, according to the results of a survey released on Wednesday.

In the first-ever survey of young people between 18 and 39 in all 50 states about the topic, the Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany discovered that nearly two-thirds of those polled did not know that 6 million Jews were killed in the Holocaust. Nearly half could not name a single concentration camp or ghetto. Almost a quarter either did not believe the Holocaust happened, that it was exaggerated, or were unsure. About 12% had not heard about the Holocaust at all, or were unsure if they had.

Do you know what today is? It is the 233rd birthday of the Constitution. Should be kind of big deal, right?

The fact is our children know nothing about the civics of this country, world or U.S. history. Heck, most can’t do math or read at their grade level. Parents are beginning to see this now that their kids are at home, taking Zoom classes. They see what kids are being taught. They see that they know more about climate change than the Constitution. They know more about tolerance and diversity than they know about math. They know more about the LGBTQ than they know about U.S. history. Why do you think there is such a push to get kids out of public schools and into charter schools.

The Leftists have taken the educational institutions and are creating a future population of Antifa and BLM activists.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/shocking-and-saddening-survey-shows-profound-ignorance-of-holocaust-among-u-s-young-people-including-nearly-20-in-new-york-who-believe-jews-were-responsible

FIRST-EVER 50-STATE SURVEY ON HOLOCAUST KNOWLEDGE OF AMERICAN MILLENNIALS AND GEN Z REVEALS SHOCKING RESULTS

Interesting

A Kappa Delta sorority sister at Pennsylvania’s Franklin & Marshall College found herself behind bars with bail set at $1 million after engaging in alleged criminal protesting.

Kathryn Patterson, 20, joined demonstrations in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, over the fatal police shooting of 27-year-old Ricardo Munoz, who, according to body-cam footage, charged an officer while wielding a knife.

The undergrad was charged with arson, among other felony charges.

In total, 12 other alleged criminal rioters were also charged, with nine of them slapped with a $1 million bail, including Patterson.

Speaking to The Associated Press, Patterson’s father Chip Patterson called the $1 million bail “obscene.”

“Everything that I know so far, which is not a lot, indicates that Kat is not guilty of those charges. But then again, we’ll have to wait and see. I cannot tell you how long this night has been. I think regardless of what these people did or didn’t do, the bail amount is just outrageous and clearly against the Eighth Amendment.”

Yeah, I wonder what amendment protects the owner of the store she burned down? Oh, that’s right. It was in the Declaration of Independence:

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

Her rights shouldn’t count when she deprived someone else of his rights. Anyway, her bail was dropped to $50,000.

This Could Be Our October Surprise

The Department of Justice is looking into whether federal charges can be brought against Seattle Mayor Jenny Durkan over her failure to crack down on a so-called “autonomous zone” controlled for weeks by rioters.

Attorney General William Barr has tasked the DOJ’s civil rights division with investigating whether charges can be brought against Durkan, The New York Times reported on Wednesday evening citing two people familiar with the discussions. Barr has also asked federal prosecutors to consider charging rioters with sedition and insurrection against the United States government, according to The Wall Street Journal.

Barr’s reported push to charge rioters with federal crimes emphasizes the Trump administration’s push to reestablish law and order across America’s major cities, which have together been rocked by record amounts of damage. Insurance companies may shell out a record $2 billion to businesses and individuals because of riot-related destruction.

The DoJ is looking at charging do-nothing politicians with sedition. According to FindLaw.com:

Sedition is a serious felony punishable by fines and up to 20 years in prison and it refers to the act of inciting revolt or violence against a lawful authority with the goal of destroying or overthrowing it.

The Wall Street Journal says that charging politicians with sedition may be a stretch:

To bring a sedition case, prosecutors would have to prove there was a conspiracy to attack government agents or officials that posed an imminent danger, legal experts said. They added that there is a fine line between the expression of antigovernment sentiment, which could be protected speech under the First Amendment even if it included discussions of violence, and a plot that presented an imminent danger and could justify a charge of sedition.

The DoJ is also going after rioters on charges that could include sedition, conspiracy and RICO charges. In case you don’t know, RICO laws target those who cross state lines in order to commit crimes. So if Antifa member, Blake Smallschlong, decides to barrow mom’s car and drive from San Francisco to Portland and sets a building on fire, that is a federal crime and can fall under RICO.

I personally think that President Trump is getting closer to implementing the Insurrection Act. This is the act that allows the President to send in National Guard troops into cities and states to calm insurrections not matter what the mayor or governor want. I think he should have done this a week after the riots started. He still might do it. But I also understand the reason Trump doesn’t want to use it though it has been used several times in the past. The Presidents who have used the Insurrection Act include:

• Herbert Hoover
• Woodrow Wilson
• Franklin D. Roosevelt
• Swight D. Eisenhower
• John F. Kennedy
• Lyndon B. Johnson
• George W. Bush

The reason Trump doesn’t want to use it is because it is something that so goes against the Constitution and the rights of states and municipalities, even temporarily. I agree. But if the states and municipalities are blowing this so badly that law abiding citizens are getting hurt or their property destroyed, something needs to be done. That is mentioned in the Declaration of Independence and Constitution too.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/judge-sets-allegedly-rioting-sorority-sisters-bail-at-1-million-dad-outraged
https://www.dailywire.com/news/report-seattle-mayor-may-face-federal-charges-over-autonomous-zone-fiasco
https://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-charges/sedition.html

https://slate.com/culture/2020/09/mulan-disney-remake-china-history.html

Cuties ain’t so cute.
Is it time to leave Netflix?
Many say it is.

I Told You So

Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a bill into law last week that would allow a young adult who has gay sex with a minor to escape registering as a sex offender in some cases, based on a judge’s discretion.

SB145, which was first introduced into the California State Legislature in January 2019 by state Sen. Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco), finally passed the 40-member state Senate by a vote of 23-10, as The Daily Wire reported.

Proponents of the legislation such as Wiener claim the law, which provides a judge more leeway in statutory rape cases involving non-vaginal forms of sex, rectifies California’s historical discrimination against the LGBTQ community. Under SB145, if a young adult has gay sex with a minor 14 or older who is less than 10 years younger, a judge will have the discretion whether to place the individual on the sex offender registry.

As the San Francisco Chronicle explained, “Under current law, a judge can decide whether to place a man who has vaginal intercourse with an underage teenage girl on the sex offender registry based on the facts of the case. But if anal or oral sex, or vaginal penetration with anything other than a penis is involved, the adult must register as a sex offender[.]”

Scott Weiner said:

“I am so grateful that Governor Newsom — one of the LGBTQ community’s strongest allies ever — once again has shown that he’s willing to support our community when it’s hard. And make no mistake: the politics here are hard, with the massive Trump, QAnon and MAGA misinformation campaign against the legislation. The facts are clear: SB 145 simply ends anti-LGBTQ discrimination. Today, California took yet another step toward an equitable society.”

Wiener said, who also introduced the 2017 bill that made knowingly exposing a partner to HIV no longer a felony.

Weiner has before blamed alleged QAnon conspiracy theorists for sending many of the threats against him and accusing him of trying to legalize pedophilia. “I’ve been the subject of death threats and personal attacks, threatening to decapitate me and send my head to my mother,” Wiener said during an online news conference last month. “This kind of slander, not just against me but against my community, is outrageous and we have to speak out against it.”

Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez (D-San Diego) said, “I cannot in my mind as a mother understand how sex between a 24-year-old and a 14-year-old could ever be consensual, how it could ever not be a registrable offense. We should never give up on this idea that children should be in no way subject to a predator.”

https://www.dailywire.com/news/newsom-signs-bill-that-could-alter-sex-offender-registration-for-gay-sex-with-minors

Cuties

So I started the show with California normalizing pedophilia. It seemed like a great segway into a new movie released by Netflix called Cuties. Netflix got into trouble by their poster of four girls, about 11 years old, who were barely dressed and were posed provocatively. Netflix pulled the ad.

The movie was shown at the Sundance Film Festival and won an award. It was produced and shot in France. When watching, one could tell it was dubbed in English. It was directed by an African woman named Maimouna Doucoure. That’s an important detail we will go into a little later.

What is It About?

• A little girl from Sudan, I think, lives in France. She is a Muslim girl that wears the head scarf and the whole thing.
• Her father goes back to his home country to bring back a second wife to the dismay of his first wife. You never see the father and, rarely, the mother.
• The little girl goes to school and decides to shed her Muslim garb. Mind you, she never gets into trouble at home for this.
• She meets four other girls and shows them some of her dance moves. She learned those moves by watching them on her phone from the Internet.
• The girls start practicing their dance moves. The Muslim girl, Amy I think, teaches them how to be sexy. This is actually the longest part of the movie.
• The girls join a dance contest.
• Amy, upset about her parents and exploring her sexuality, sends a pick of her poon on a social media platform.
• The other girls, upset about the poon pic, kick her off the teen for another chick, who is far less talented.
• Amy tricks the girl who replaced her to miss the competition and competes with her former friends.
• During the competition, at the end of their performance,  Amy stops and runs off the stage, crying.
• That’s the end of the movie.

That’s the hour and a half movie in a nutshell.

The Controversy

On Rottentomatoes, critics gave it a 90% approval. The viewers score was a little less at 6%. That should tell you something.

Ben Shapiro of the Daily Wire, on his podcast, thought the message of the film was good but the execution was bad. Shapiro said that the message of children being hooked to screens and social media, which is what the director announced, was absolutely true. But the exploitation of the children, and all those who had a screen test, could not be denied.

Matt Walsh, also from the Daily Wire said in his piece:

“This is not a “commentary” on child sexual exploitation — it is child sexual exploitation, clear as day, in all its sadism.

With these horrific scenes now publicly available, it seems almost pointless to engage with the plainly absurd notion that the filmmakers had 11-year-old children writhe around and gyrate while barely clothed as some kind of protest against the sexualization of children. It would be like a slasher film, featuring several scenes of various screaming victims being disemboweled for our amusement, claiming in its defense that it only meant to comment on the problem of graphic violence in film. Indeed, that actually is the defense often offered for slasher flicks, and it’s as weak in that case as it is here. The guy who made “Texas Chainsaw Massacre” may have told himself that he had nobler intentions, but the fact remains that most people who watch “Texas Chainsaw Massacre” just want to see, well, a Texas chainsaw massacre.

No filmmaker wants to come out and admit that they have produced gratuitous garbage for a lowest common denominator audience. But many filmmakers do produce that sort of material for that sort of audience, whether they admit it or not. And “Cuties” belongs on that heap. Buried somewhere deep underneath it, hopefully, where it cannot be seen.”

Yeah, I’m pretty sure he doesn’t like the film.

 Ted Cruz is pretty pissed off. He posted on Twitter:

Tulsi Gabbard Tweeted:

.@netflix child porn “Cuties” will certainly whet the appetite of pedophiles & help fuel the child sex trafficking trade. 1 in 4 victims of trafficking are children. It happened to my friend’s 13 year old daughter. Netflix, you are now complicit. #CancelNetflix pic.twitter.com/GI8KFH7LFq

The director of Cuties, Maïmouna Doucouré stated that her film was actually a feminist film. She said:

“It’s because I saw so many things and so many issues around me lived by young girls, that I decided to make this film and sound an alarm and say, ‘We need to protect our children. It’s bold, its feminist, but it’s so important and necessary to create debate and try to find solutions, for me as an artist, for politicians and parents. It’s a real issue.It’s important to see someone like you on the screen, and to grow up with a lot of possibilities. So, of course, diversity and inclusion have to be the keys to progress in our cinema.”

What I Think

I saw the movie. Let me give you a quick synopsis: it sucked. It just wasn’t a good movie. It was boring like every dance film.

The sexualization of the little girls was over the top.

I do question how many kids were actually exploited during the screen shots.

The “message” that the writer and director wanted to show were only visible at the very beginning and the very end. Though I do think the use of social media and its importance to our children was very well portrayed. But the message was lost due to the hyper-sexualization of the children.

Biden Boofs

https://www.dailywire.com/news/slate-op-ed-explores-the-creepy-conservative-obsession-with-netflixs-cuties
https://www.dailywire.com/news/walsh-child-sexualizing-cuties-movie-on-netflix-is-even-worse-than-we-thought-its-time-to-cancel-netflix
https://www.dailywire.com/news/you-are-now-complicit-tulsi-gabbard-blasts-netflix-for-promoting-child-porn
https://www.dailywire.com/news/ted-cruz-joins-other-gop-lawmakers-calling-on-doj-to-investigate-netflix-for-distributing-child-porn
https://www.dailywire.com/news/cuties-director-hits-back-against-critics-its-bold-its-feminist

The cops are targets
Newsome is an idiot.
NFL busts out.

Another Cowardly Attack

Two deputies with the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department were hospitalized Saturday evening after a male gunman approached their patrol vehicle, fired multiple shots inside in an ambush attack, and then fled on foot, according to officials and video surveillance.

One of the deputies is a 31-year-old mother of a 6-year-old boy, and the other is a 24-year-old male, revealed Sheriff Alex Villanueva in a press conference Saturday evening. He did not disclose their condition.

“This is just a somber reminder: It’s a dangerous job,” said Villanueva during the press conference. “Actions — words — have consequences, and our job does not get any easier because people don’t like law enforcement.”

“The two deputies were doing their job, minding their own business, watching out for the safety of the people on the train, and seeing somebody just walk up and just start shooting on them — it pisses me off, it dismays me at the same time,” he said later in the press conference. “There’s no pretty way to say it.”

A surveillance video was released showing the piece of shit shooting into the car and running away like a pussy. It is only about 9 seconds long though the police say they have a longer video that has not been released.

Both are in serious condition but made it through surgery.

Just to show how much human garbage belongs to BLM and how they needed to be treated like the terrorists they are. They walked to St. Francis Hospital where the policemen are being treated, unfurled a BLM flag and this is how they dealt with security and L.A. Sheriff. It’s explicit. You’ve been warned:

These people are just pure filth. Human garbage. If they died and were sent to Hell tomorrow, no one would care. Anyone who wishes people to die are just garbage. I don’t hope they die and I hate these pieces of shit about as much as another human can hate anyone but I would not want to kill them. They’ll get theirs later. Probably from someone from their own race.

But the media is complicit too.

A Los Angeles National Public Radio reporter was arrested early Sunday, Los Angeles County Sheriffs said, after she “interfered” with police trying to prevent alleged Black Lives Matter protesters from storming the hospital where two severely wounded L.A. County Sheriffs deputies were taken following a horrific ambush attack.

A number of people on Twitter lashed out at the L.A. Sheriffs Department for arresting Huang, arguing that her press credentials can be seen hanging around her neck in the ABC footage. The Sheriff’s Department, though, later tweeted that Huang admitted that she was not properly identified.

“After deputies issued a dispersal order for the unlawful assembly of a group of protesters blocking the hospital emergency entrance & exits, a male adult protester refused to comply & cooperate,” L.A. County Sheriffs tweeted, explaining why Huang was detained. “During his arrest, a struggle ensued at which time a female adult ran towards the deputies, ignored repeated commands to stay back as they struggled with the male and interfered with the arrest.”

So that’s awesome. I have a few thoughts about this:

• This is a situation where BLM rioters are storming a hospital and police are trying to stop them. Then, this reporter, with no proper identification, interferes and gets arrested. And NPR says she’s a victim. No.
• Why do we have National Public Radio? You know, news that is financed by the government? They are slanted and have been for years. I don’t want any of my taxes going to them. That also includes PBS. Fuck Big Bird and Elmo.

The Rhetoric Continues

This is a story about two rail road police watching trains. That’s it. And they were shot for no reason outside of their uniform.

But no one cares. I thought Black Lives Matter was about black lives mattering? Now I know it is only about black lives mattering. That means my life doesn’t matter. Because I’m white. Could that be considered…I don’t know…racist?

According to NAACP chapter president Bishop Talbert Swan, there is “no such thing as Blue Lives” because police choose to do their jobs whereas black people do not choose the color of their skin.

In a Twitter post on Saturday, the NAACP Greater Springfield president said that while the death or murder of a police officer is a terrible tragedy, it does not have the same implication as a black person being gunned down by police.

“There’s no such thing as BLUE LIVES… Stop comparing your JOB with my LIFE… Your CAREER is a choice, my BLACKNESS isn’t. #BlackLivesMatter  #BlueLivesMatter,” he tweeted.

“No one deserves to be unjustly murdered, police or citizens. If you’re expressing outrage over the shooting of two sheriff’s deputies, but we’re [sic] defending #KyleRittenhouse murdering two protesters in #Kenosha only days ago, you need to shut up and have a seat.”

This is the height of racism and prejudice. One’s race doesn’t matter. It’s the uniform you wear.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/biden-on-la-cops-being-shot-violence-of-any-kind-is-wrong
https://www.dailywire.com/news/l-a-sheriff-two-deputies-31-year-old-mother-24-year-old-male-ambushed-in-cowardly-attack
https://www.dailywire.com/news/naacp-chapter-president-being-a-police-officer-is-a-choice-no-such-thing-as-blue-lives
https://www.dailywire.com/news/la-sherffis-npr-reporter-arrested-for-interfering-with-cops-as-they-tried-to-control-blm-protests-outside-hospital
https://www.dailywire.com/news/blm-activists-try-to-block-storm-hospital-where-shot-deputies-were-taken-i-hope-they-fing-die

Is This Guy Kidding??

If you have been living under a rock, or just don’t care about California, you will know that California has had a bunch of brush and forest fire. I live in San Diego, where there really aren’t any forest fores and the skies are orange. It makes for great sunsets but I can hardly breathe in the mornings. In San Francisco, which is already a shit hole because of the homeless and drugs, the smoke is so think you can’t see the Golden Gate Bridge. In Los Angeles, which is already a shit hole because of the homeless and drugs, it looks like it did in the 1970s.

But Gavin Newsom knows what’s going on.

Like I have said before a hundred times, I live in California. The air is a mess because of the fires. But we also have a major drug problem, homeless problem, we have rolling blackouts because our infrastructure sucks and we are constantly short of water. We also have the highest tax rates in the country. I’m thinking there probably is something other than climate that is causing the fires, like mismanagement of the forests. Why do I think that? This state, one of the biggest economies in the world, mismanages everything. We have the highest taxes and are $1.2 trillion in debt.

Now, I know the climate change argument. I do believe humans influence climate. That is common sense. We have more cars than people in this country (that’s probably not true but you get what I mean) and each spews carbon monoxide. But are we creating an environment that will be gone in ten years as Gavin Newsom seems to talk about.

I look at the way Los Angeles looked like when I was 14 years old. It looks like it does now. I couldn’t go to the school I wanted to because I had such bad allergies. Guess what happened? We did the right thing and the skies over L.A. We lowered emissions, drove less and did what needed to do to clean up our city.

There is nothing we can do about these fires. They are caused by nature left unchecked in a crowded environment. Let’s look at what is happening in California:

• Droughts – California is a desert. We have always had droughts.
• Discontinuation of controlled burns.
• Discontinuation of removing brush from private property.
• Discontinuation of the clearing of forests of brush and dead plant life.
• Discontinuation of logging.
• The temperature in July through October.
• Santa Ana winds.

The last point here is that California is the future of the country? Does the California Ken doll believe that climate stops at the Californian border?

There was a map on Twitter showing all the locations of the fires throughout California, Oregon and Washington. There are no fires in Mexico or Canada. Does this mean there are no fires in Canada. Yes, there are no fires in Canada. Why? Because they actually log throughout their country and control the brush growth because they have had forest fire too.

A Good Try but Still a Fail

The football season started last week. I know that there was a lot of talk about how football would react to this whole BLM thing.

On Thursday, the Kansas City Chiefs played the Houston Texans. I have to say, it wasn’t as bad as what was reported. During the game anyway. Here’s what happened:

• The Chiefs stayed on the field during the National Anthem but the Texans stayed in the locker room.
• The teams joined arms right before the kick off.
• Al Michaels and Chris Collinsworth, the commentators, made their comments about the BLM movement but said that they were there to commentate a game and would do so.
• There was a “End Racism” in the back of the end zone but it was conveniently not viewable.
• The players has some sort of social justice message on the back of their helmet, but it was conveniently not viewable.
• The commercials were filled with virtue signaling, including a commercial produced by the NFL.

Many are complaining about the social justice messaging than me. I do find it annoying but I can live with it. I think I am going to have to since social justice has inundated every inch of our culture. We cannot get away from it. Does that mean I am going to tolerate it forever? Probably not. But I will for now. At least so I can watch some football games. I am already turned off by basketball and baseball.

Let’s get into that.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/colin-kaepernick-blasts-newly-woke-nfl-on-opening-day-calls-leagues-social-justice-focus-propaganda
https://www.dailywire.com/news/nfl-pro-blm-groups-dismantle-systems-of-oppression
https://www.dailywire.com/news/virtual-revival-madden-nfl-21-will-put-colin-kaepernick-at-the-helm-of-any-nfl-team-in-franchise-mode

Part of the Culture

Social justice is not inundated all of culture. It’s annoying but it is something the Left has wanted to do for a very long time. We are seeing it in the media, the arts, in entertainment, even at work. That’s right, even work. Don’t have the right opinion or go against someone else’s “truth” and you will be cancelled (fired).

Right now, the police have been made into villains. We have been hearing about that for years. We are being told our systems are racist. Mostly by rich white people. No one can show, statistically, why the police are bad or what systems are racist. That’s what people like me are here to point out. That our police are not corrupt. Our systems are not racist. I have chosen to believe this and will spend the time I have left to prove this. I will fight. Not beat anyone up or join the Proud Boys or anything. I will just defend this system because it is the best system in human history and I think those that try to tear it up have no idea what is out there.

So this is something I want to do. Talk about the idiocy of the culture. This is how I will fight.