Our culture and society is about to crater. Citizens do not matter. Children do not matter. Justice does not matter. All that matters for our institutions and politicians is narrative, ideology, and intersectionality.
I have a question: When are we going to stop this.
The End of Feminism?
According to Fox News:
A Massachusetts judge overseeing the murder trial of Lindsay Clancy gave jurors a Tuey-Rodriguez charge Wednesday after they reported for a second time that they were unable to reach a unanimous verdict.
The instruction is given to a deadlocked jury to encourage continued deliberations while reminding jurors they should not abandon honestly held beliefs simply to reach a verdict.
Judge William Sullivan sent jurors back to deliberate Tuesday after they first indicated they were struggling to agree. After the jury again reported that it was deadlocked, Sullivan delivered the formal charge.
A Tuey-Rodriguez charge is unique to Massachusetts and is sometimes called a “dynamite charge” because it is intended to help break a jury impasse without coercing a verdict.
The instruction takes its name from two Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court decisions. In Commonwealth v. Tuey (1851), the court approved an instruction encouraging deadlocked jurors to re-examine their views with an open mind. More than a century later, in Commonwealth v. Rodriguez (1973), the state’s highest court revised that language to remove pressure on minority or holdout jurors, creating a neutral instruction that asks all jurors to carefully consider one another’s views while maintaining their own honestly held convictions.
Receiving a Tuey-Rodriguez charge does not mean a verdict is imminent. The instruction is generally considered a necessary step before a judge declares a mistrial because of a hung jury, although it often results in jurors reaching a unanimous verdict after further deliberations.
According to the Post Millennial:
A judge in the Bronx had found that a mother who was suffering from postpartum psychosis was not guilty of killing her two kids. The case comes as there has been national attention around the Lindsay Clancy case, which bears similarities.
Dimone Fleming, 26, was found not to be responsible because of her mental state in court on Monday after she killed two of her children, 3-year-old Daishawn Fleming and 11-month-old Octavius Canada, per the New York Times. Fleming submerged the two young boys in a bathtub on November 26, 2022, killing them.
Fleming was initially charged with first-degree murder, but was found not guilty by reason of insanity. According to psychiatrist Dr. Eric Goldsmith, Fleming was “grossly psychotic and out of touch with reality” the night of the killings at a family shelter.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/what-tuey-rodriguez-charge-judge-gives-instruction-deadlocked-lindsay-clancy-jury
https://thepostmillennial.com/clancy-copycat-2-year-old-chicago-area-boy-dies-in-domestic-related-homicide-mom-found-by-police-attempting-self-harm?utm_campaign=64466
https://thepostmillennial.com/nyc-mother-found-not-guilty-of-killing-her-2-young-children-postpartum-defense-successful
Tell Me If There’s Something Missing
According to Tucson Centennial:
The gunman and two victims in a early Monday murder-suicide outside a longtime Tucson gay bar had no prior connection, authorities say. A search of the shooter’s home turned up more evidence that the killings were “motivated by hate,” in addition to the list of LGBTQ businesses he carried at the scene.
A note found in the search indicated that he acted alone, police said.
Tucson police were still investigating Tuesday after Ousman Ceesay, 44, got into a confrontation with two men outside Venture-N, 1239 N. 6th Ave, shortly after midnight on Monday before fatally shooting them and turning the gun on himself.
Authorities dubbed the shooting a hate crime. 42-year-old Vincent Anthony Siqueiros and 33-year-old Cameron Davis Capara were pronounced dead at the scene.
Ceesay was taken to a nearby hospital, where he died shortly after his arrival. A list of businesses associated with Tucson’s LGBTQ community and their addresses was found on him, according to authorities.
Investigators who searched Ceesay’s home Monday afternoon found more evidence, including a note that indicated the shooting “a targeted attack motivated by hate toward the LGBTQIA+ community” and that he acted alone, officers said. Authorities say Ceesay had no prior contact with Tucson police before the shooting nor any records to indicate he was legally barred from owning a firearm. They believe he only lived in Tucson for a short time.
Police also on Monday examined the outdoor crime scene, spoke to several witnesses and family members and canvassed the surrounding area for physical evidence and surveillance footage, which showed Ceesay never tried to enter the bar.
At the Venture-N parking lot, they found several shell casings, which were later determined to all be from the same 9mm handgun, also found at the scene.
That’s about all you need to know from the article and several like it. No pictures of the guy. No history or immigration status. Just another white Christian nationalist homophobe. Or is he?
Andy Ngo tweeted:
Three men were killed in a shooting at a gay bar’s parking lot in Tucson, Ariz. on Aug. 31. The suspected shooter, one of the deceased, is an African Muslim named Ousman Ceesay. The case is being investigated as an anti-LGBTQ+ incident due to the Muslim being found with a list of targeted gay businesses.
One of the victims has been identified as radical Antifa associate Cameron Davis Capara. He advocated anti-American views and supported mass illegal migration. He claimed to be a journalist.
Many LGBTQ+ people have been killed by extremist Muslims in the U.S. but the legacy queer groups routinely advocate in support of fundamentalist Islam and condemn those who blaspheme against the religion.
The Lines Don’t Even Hide the Cracks
According to Fox News:
A Los Angeles councilwoman’s celebration of a newly painted neighborhood crosswalk has drawn online mockery after critics seized on the months-long timeline and glossy “street infrastructure” rollout for what they said amounted to a basic city service.
Los Angeles Councilmember Nithya Raman, a member of the Democratic Socialists of America, is facing online mockery after celebrating the completion of a neighborhood crosswalk project, which was first raised by the Los Feliz Neighborhood Council late last year, in a post on X. The post featured before-and-after images and thanked her field team for “continuing to problem-solve, push for solutions, and make our streets safer.”
“Dear Lord, Nithya. Your standards are so incredibly low,” responded Richard Grenell, Presidential Envoy for Special Missions amid Donald Trump’s second term. “They didn’t even fix the street, they painted over cracks. And it took them a year…..”
“Holy s—t, my sides…Nithya Raman’s big accomplishment is taking 9 months to paint 7 yellow stripes over a cracked street?” quipped former L.A. mayoral candidate and reality television star Spencer Pratt. “How dumb do you have to be to post this? BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA”
Raman’s announcement labeled the work “Improving Our Neighborhood Street Infrastructure” and included before-and-after photos showing yellow crosswalk markings across the cracked roadway. She said the Los Feliz Neighborhood Council had brought the issue to her office in late 2025.
It’s Not Just White People and Jews
According to the Daily Wire:
New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, who is Muslim, said he would not support a Hindu event in Manhattan where the leader of the group that is the ideological parent of India’s ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) will speak.
Asked if the event featuring Mohan Bhagwat, head of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), should be canceled, he ripped the party’s “exclusionary vision,” declaring, “I don’t support the rally, but I don’t know if the city has any jurisdiction to cancel a private event. The vision of India that I was taught by my family and one that I grew up being very familiar with was of a pluralistic society of a secular republic that believed in the belonging of each and every person who was from India. And it has been incredibly troubling to see the rise of a movement that is predicated on an exclusionary vision.”
This is just the latest play in Mamdani’s predictable playbook, seemingly derived from an endless urge to rip into anything he deems anti-Muslim while ignoring history.
Mamdani’s sudden posture as a defender of secular pluralism ignores a long, brutal history that has included centuries of documented evidence of violent persecution of Hindus by Islamic conquerors and movements. From the medieval raids of Mahmud of Ghazni targeting iconic Hindu temples to the bloody 1921 Moplah Rebellion in Malabar and the 1946 Direct Action Day massacres, history is replete with chapters of targeted anti-Hindu aggression.
In modern times, that history extends to the violent forced exile of Kashmiri Hindus from their ancestral homes by foreign-backed Islamist militants.
Instead of recognizing the deep-seated historical trauma of non-Muslim communities, Mamdani acts as though any group standing up for its cultural heritage is inherently suspicious, as long as they aren’t part of his preferred voting blocs.
More Surrender
According to the California Post
Legislation that would recognize two Muslim holidays as official California holidays is nearing the final steps of passage before being sent out for Gov. Gavin Newsom’s signature.
Assembly Bill 2017 would designate Eid al-Fitr and Eid al-Adha as state holidays, meaning state workers could use holiday credits to take off work on those days.
“California is home to one of the largest and most vibrant Muslim communities in the country,” said bill author Assemblymember Matt Haney (D).
“AB 2017 is about making sure Muslim Californians are seen, valued, and treated with the same dignity as every other community in our state.”
Under the bill, community colleges and public schools could also to choose to recognize those days and teach about them.
The legislation already passed the state Assembly 64-1 in late May and is now waiting for a full state Senate vote.
It has until the end of legislative session, expected to be this coming Monday, to head over to the governor’s desk.
Eid al-Fitr, meaning the “Festival of Breaking the Fast,” marks the conclusion of Ramadan, the month during which Muslims fast from dawn to sunset. Eid al-Adha, known as the “Festival of Sacrifice,” commemorates the Prophet Ibrahim’s willingness to sacrifice his son in obedience of Allah.
Both dates revolve around the Islamic lunar calendar, meaning every year, the two holidays fall on different dates of the year.
If the bill is enacted, the two holy days add on to a growing list of community-specific holidays the state has recognized, including Diwali and Lunar New Year.
Muslim groups in the state have urged passage of the legislation, noting California has more than a million Muslim residents.
Christians, Unite!
According to the Daily Wire:
The Dominican Sisters of Hawthorne have been caring for impoverished people dying from cancer for more than 125 years. At Rosary Hill Home in New York, the sisters have treated roughly 45,000 low-income cancer patients at no charge, regardless of faith or background.
Think about what that mission looks like in our current culture. These sisters intentionally enter the part of life that most of us would rather not see. They wash the sick, feed them, and sit beside the dying. They accompany people through the suffering that medicine cannot cure. Now they are in federal court to protect their ability to care for those with terminal cancer, because the state of New York wants to force them to participate in suicide.
New York’s assisted suicide law took effect August 5, making New York the 13th state, along with the District of Columbia, to allow doctors to prescribe a lethal dose of medication to terminally ill patients. Under the law, medical providers caring for terminally ill New Yorkers must proactively inform and counsel their patients about their “option” to kill themselves, a mandate the plaintiffs argue is “far broader than anything required by states like California, Oregon, and Washington.”
The Carmelite Sisters for the Aged and Infirm, Dominican Sisters of Hawthorne, Missionary Sisters of St. Benedict, and Little Sisters of the Poor joined the lawsuit, as did the Diocese of Rockville Centre and Catholic Health, a network of Long Island hospitals. The State of New York temporarily agreed not to enforce its assisted-suicide mandates against the Catholic plaintiffs, but this is not a final victory. The motion for a preliminary injunction remains before the court and the underlying constitutional case has yet to be decided.
In other words, nuns whose entire vocation is caring for the dying are in federal court fighting for the right to care for the dying without being forced to usher them toward suicide.
Mother Marie Edward, Superior General of the Dominican Sisters of Hawthorne, put it plainly: for more than a century, her order has ministered to the poor who are dying of cancer as if they were Christ himself, offering comfort, prayer, and medical care, not death. That is the calling New York’s law now threatens to override.
But New York is not an isolated case; Bishop Thomas Paprocki of the Diocese of Springfield has joined a Lutheran nursing home and four Catholic physicians in suing to block the “End-of-Life Options” law, set to take effect September 12. The coalition argues that the state’s suicide regime abandons “nearly two millennia of medical practice” while requiring conscientious objectors to participate in it. Health care entities must promote the “benefits” of the suicide law to patients even if they object, and are required to allow on-site practitioners to facilitate patient access to assisted suicide.
France. New York. Illinois. Different countries, different courts, same disease. A throwaway culture that has grown deeply uncomfortable with dependence, it’s one that prizes autonomy and productivity so highly that when a person can no longer keep pace, the question quietly shifts. It’s no longer “what do we owe this person?” It becomes “is this life still worth the trouble?”
We already ask that question at the beginning of life and call the answer “choice.” Now we’re asking it at the end and calling it “compassion.” The logic is the same. So is the result: a culture that treats the inconvenient as disposable.
There’s another way to respond to suffering, and it isn’t complicated. It’s presence instead of a prescription. It’s service instead of an exit. A civilized society doesn’t make it easier to die; it makes it easier to be cared for. That means investing in hospice and palliative care. It means real support for the families quietly caring for aging parents and disabled children. It means making sure no one facing a terminal diagnosis ever has to wonder if dying quickly would simply be easier on everyone else.
New York Archbishop Ronald Hicks warned that the state’s law ushers in “a new and frightening era,” and asked how long “compassion” for the terminally ill will take to harden from a choice into an expectation for the disabled, the elderly, and the poor. That is a question worth sitting with.
For 125 years, the Hawthorne sisters did not ask whether a dying person’s life is worth living. They simply washed him, fed him, and stayed. In a culture that measures people by what they produce and discards what it cannot use, that is the most radical act remaining.
We are not losing our humanity because we have become cruel. We’re losing it because we’ve forgotten where our humanity comes from in the first place — not our usefulness, but the simple fact of having been made in His image. The sisters see Christ in the dying because they’ve never stopped looking for Him there. A nation that trains itself to stop looking will eventually find it can’t see anyone at all.
Re-Writing History
According to the Post Millennial:
After an internal memo was leaked from the taxpayer-funded CBC in Canada that said the outlet would no longer call the 9/11 terrorist attacks terrorism, the outlet has reversed course, saying that it claimed they didn’t ever want to “minimize or obscure the horror of that day and who was behind it.”
The internal memo that was leaked, which was crafted by CBC’s senior director of journalistic standards and public trust, Basem Boshra, had stated, “Do not refer to the Sept. 11 attacks as terrorist attacks.”
The memo described the events not as terrorism, but as hijackings that led to passenger jets crashing into the World Trade Center and other government buildings. In a statement, the CBC said in response to huge backlash to the leak, “It is the practice of the CBC to exercise extreme caution before using the words ‘terrorist’ and ‘terrorism.’ The memo was a reminder of the longstanding practice that favours the use of these terms with attribution in our reporting.”
After getting caught, Boshra published a blog post claiming that there has been a “swirl of confusion” about the internal memo that explicitly directed reporters not to use the words “terrorist attacks” to refer to 9/11. He claimed the leak was “without context,” and said that the note was instead an instruction that attribution was needed to describe 9/11 as a terror attack.
However, the outlet has reversed itself and said that attribution is “no longer required” to accurately describe what the 9/11 attacks were, an act of terrorism. “After reviewing our current language guidance, we have decided to adjust it to clarify that direct attribution is not required for describing the historic events of 9/11 as terrorism,” Boshra said in a post to the CBC’s editor’s blog.
