About qezzit

Episode 185 – Race and Sex and Class…Oh, My!

Race, Sex, Creed and Class.
INTERSECTIONALITY:
Very, very BAD!

 

Taylor Swift is on a crusade against the United States government  Injustice has not struck the heart of the United States census and SJW General Swift needs to swoop in and save the world.

The United States government had the audacity to ask if the head of household is a male of female. That’s right! No, transgender, cisgender, non-binary, beastiosexual or any other of the 1800 different genders have been defined. Just male and female.

“I got my census the other day and there were two choices: male and female. And that erasure was so upsetting to me,” the “Lover” singer added.

Swift described the two-gender option as “a really brutal way of dismissing” transgender and nonbinary citizens. “We need to make sure we elect people who care about all communities.” -DailyWire

For years, Taylor Swift has stayed completely out of politics and got crap for it. I thought it was actually quite refreshing. But she received a lot of pressure from Leftist groups about her opinions. She finely caved and I no longer listen to Taylor Swift. I know she doesn’t care. I’m not exactly in her demographic. She came out as the typical dumb Millennial; as Leftist as the day is long. Her specialty seems to be LGBTQ issues but hating Trump is good enough.

This is really. dumb. The government doesn’t care about what people you are attracted too. They only care if you are male or female. If you are a male who has decided to be female, fine. Check the female box. They do not care. I am pretty sure the government does not have the other genders listed because the form would end up being 400 pages longer (it’s long enough as it is) and they do not have enough computing power to calculate the demographics of the 1800 different genders.

Not to mention, no one really cares. I do not fill out the census because I am sure there are three illegal aliens out there that are filling it out for me. That is another thing I find funny: It’s an affront not to add all the different genders but a bad thing to ask one’s immigration status (something that is actually important).

Typical. The Left always has to point out someone is a victim of something. Even check boxes can be bigoted.

But this is a perfect story to lead us into today’s topics: Identity Politics and Intersectionality.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/taylor-swift-deeply-upset-by-gender-options-on-u-s-census

 

 

Identity Politics and Intersectionality

Introduction

I was going to deal with race in this section today because it is such a hot button topic. Black Lives Matter has been heading the protests since the death of George Floyd and you cannot listen to CNN for more than 15 minutes without hearing the words “race”, “racism”, and “white supremacist”. But, then I thought about it and realized race was not really the problem. It is Identity Politics and Intersectionality that are the problems.

Black Lives Matter (a terrorist group as far as I am concerned) whole philosophy is based on Intersectionality. In their manifesto on their website, they say:

“We make our spaces family-friendly and enable parents to fully participate with their children. We dismantle the patriarchal practice that requires mothers to work “double shifts” so that they can mother in private even as they participate in public justice work…

“We foster a queer‐affirming network. When we gather, we do so with the intention of freeing ourselves from the tight grip of heteronormative thinking, or rather, the belief that all in the world are heterosexual (unless s/he or they disclose otherwise).

We cultivate an intergenerational and communal network free from ageism. We believe that all people, regardless of age, show up with the capacity to lead and learn.

We embody and practice justice, liberation, and peace in our engagements with one another.” -BlackLivesMatter.com

So, they bond with women, gays, transgenders and the old against the patriarchy which is defined as white straight male led slavery. They are not all about black people. They are about all “oppressed” groups. If one can get through all of the communist crap they are peddling (terms like “collective” and “comrades” are sprinkled throughout the short essay), one can see that BLM is more than just about black lives.

This is the perfect cut over into what is really wrong with this philosophy.

 

Identity Politics

This is a philosophy that came out in the 1960’s during the Civil Rights Movement and the second wave of feminism. Though the term was not coined until much later, there were studies by professors in the late seventies and early eighties that “proved” that one’s identity (age, race, gender and creed) put one in a category of victimhood.

Identity Politics is defined as:

“The laden phrase “identity politics” has come to signify a wide range of political activity and theorizing founded in the shared experiences of injustice of members of certain social groups. Rather than organizing solely around belief systems, programmatic manifestos, or party affiliation, identity political formations typically aim to secure the political freedom of a specific constituency marginalized within its larger context. Members of that constituency assert or reclaim ways of understanding their distinctiveness that challenge dominant oppressive characterizations, with the goal of greater self-determination.”  -(https://plato.stanford.edu, link below)

So, essentially, if you belong to a group (black, women, gay) you are a victim. When you accept that you are a victim, this will give one greater agency to discover their victimhood and go beyond it.

I know what you are thinking. Just wait for it. There is more to it then we will discuss how dumb this whole thing is.

 

Intersectionality

Identity Politics, unfortunately, does not go far enough. What if you belong to two victim groups? What if you are a black woman?

That’s where Intersectionality comes into play. The term was first used in 1989 by Kimberlé Crenshaw, a civil rights activist and legal scholar. In a paper for the University of Chicago Legal Forum, Crenshaw wrote that traditional feminist ideas and antiracist policies exclude black women because they face overlapping discrimination unique to them. “Because the intersectional experience is greater than the sum of racism and sexism, any analysis that does not take intersectionality into account cannot sufficiently address the particular manner in which Black women are subordinated,” she wrote in the paper. (Emphasis added.) (cjr.org).

It was added to the Oxford English Dictionary in 2015 and defined as:

“The interconnected nature of social categorizations such as race, class, and gender, regarded as creating overlapping and interdependent systems of discrimination or disadvantage; a theoretical approach based on such a premise.”

The Merriam-Webster Dictionary defined it as:

“The complex, cumulative way in which the effects of multiple forms of discrimination (such as racism, sexism, and classism) combine, overlap, or intersect especially in the experiences of marginalized individuals or groups.”

The victim groups you belong to will intersect to define the victim you are and the value to society you have. And what you are owed. The less intersections (or none) the less valuable.

The Intersectionality score determines an individual’s value when it comes to: philosophy, what they deserve, temperance that they have from society and economic value.

So there you have it! Let’s review:

  • You are a white woman? You use Identity Politics to emphasize your victimhood as a woman because women couldn’t vote 100 years ago. Society owes you.
  • You are a black woman? You use Intersectionality to state you are more of a victim because you are a woman (women couldn’t vote a 100 years ago) and are black (blacks were slaves and dealt with Jim Crow laws). Society owes you more.
  • You are a Native American trans female lesbian who is Muslim? Jackpot!
  • You are a straight, white, Christian male? Screwed!

 

The Big Problems with this Philosophy

I reject this philosophy. Not just because I am a straight white male Christian, one who has no victimhood and should be dismissed, but because it is stupid. And its value system, is accepted, forces our civilization to be more stupid. But, what I will talk about later, it is dangerous. Here are five reasons this philosophy fails.

First, it excludes people, even those it champions to protect.

Straight white mail Christians are screwed. As far as intersectionality is concerned, we are the root of patriarchy and all that is evil in our civilization. Fine, whatever. The problem is that there have been some pretty smart white men in our civilization. Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, St. Thomas Aquinas, Galileo, DaVinci, Shakespeare, Poe, Jefferson, Washington, Locke, Twain, Franklin, Einstein, Steinbeck. Gates, Jobs, Bezos, Musk and Trump, just to name a very few.

Ok, Trump was a joke but you get where I am going.

There are also very fine white men whose philosophy and reason I would trust far more than some of the victims that Intersectionality deems for its sainthood. Names like Shapiro, Weinstein, Klavan, Harris, Crowder, Peterson, Levin, Pool, Carolla, Rowe, Bongino, Rogan Hannity, Sowell, Mahr, Rubin, Gutfeld and Crenshaw, just to name a few. OK, Dave Rubin is gay and Greg Gutfeld is kind of gay but I trust the reason of these guys over some self-proclaimed victim. But, because these are straight, white men (or, just white men) they have no say about the moral questions of our country. Ben Shapiro has no right to argue about abortion because he is a rich white male. He had something to say about that we he was confronted with that:

Nuff said.

The above debate is another big problem with Intersectionality: It discourages reasonable debate if one of the parties does not belong to a victim group or his victimhood does not match the one he is debating. It is the worst aspect of this cultist philosophy. Anyone who doesn’t agree and is not a member of a victim group is just wrong because he doesn’t understand. Evil, science and reason be damned. When a philosophy refuses to acknowledge these and will reject truth, this is not a philosophy, it is a cult. We know where all cults lead.

Another huge problem with Intersectionality and Identity Politics is that it ignores history, law, capitalism and other social factors for those groups.

We have talked about history in our last podcast. The Left has created a historical vacuum when it comes to the United States. We never escaped slavery even though we fought a Civil War that almost killed 700,000 people. We never ended racism even though we have the 15th and 16th Amendments and have passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (voted on by white men). Women were not able to vote a hundred years ago even though we went through women’s suffrage, passed sexism laws and equal rights laws in the workplace. We are still a bigoted nation against the LGBTQ movement even though we have gay marriage.

The above mentioned some of the laws that were passed that ended discrimination. But here are a couple of laws that no one talks about when they say how systemically racist, sexist and bigoted we are. Murder and lynching are illegal. If done because of an attack on a protected victim group, the hate crime statute is enacted, adding 20 extra years in prison (I hate this). Workplace harassment and discrimination is illegal and can start civil proceedings. So if women actually earned 70 cents per dollar of a male counterpart, she can sue. That goes with any minority. There have been tens-of-thousands of cases through the court system and trillions of dollars of awards. Don’t believe me, learn a newspaper. Stories are brought up daily.

But the Left does not care about history. They want it gone. For them, our history is an inconvenience. It interferes with the narrative. That is why they are trying to destroy any statue, whether it be George Washington or Jesus Christ, to eliminate any reminents of our history.

Let’s face it: If there is anything good about the United States, why tear down the system? Why not build on it? The Left does not want that. They want the system gone.

Capitalism has been demonized by the Left. But capitalism is what has been assuring equality in the workplace. The “women earn 70% of men in the workplace” is complete crap. Here’s the skinny: Capitalism only cares about results. The bottom line. I know the Left thinks this is a bad thing, but it’s not. Capitalism only cares about the bottom line. And if capitalism could save 30% on the bottom line by hiring women or blacks, it would. Capitalism is why Jackie Robinson was the first black man that played in Major League Baseball. He was a great player that could make the the Dodgers a World Series winning team. Because if the Dodgers won the World Series, they would make money. That simple.

If a company makes widgets at at the retail cost of production at $5 per unit with manufacturing, but save $.30 per unit to be manufactured by a woman or save $.50 per unit because a black woman or a black man was hired, why not hire the black man or black women?

If I am a capitalist, why pay $1 for someone if I could pay $.70 for someone else?

Because, in capitalism, companies hire based capacity and ability. And they pay based on capacity and ability. One’s race is irrelevant. Capitalism is color-blind. If I suck at my job, I lose my job or get paid less. If I’m great at my job, I get paid more or get promoted. Period

The “big bosses” don’t know if I’m black or white. They just know what I did. If capitalist companies were racist and sexist, they would lose good workers. Because those great workers would quit and find another company. Likewise, people do not get paid less based on their race or sex. If this happened, again people would leave and go to another company. Thomas Sowell, a black economist, proved this statistically more than thirty years ago.

Everyone thinks capitalism supports the rich. It doesn’t. It supports the productive and the innovative. That includes the advantaged. If one creates, they win. Period. Amazon knew it. Apple knew it. Microsoft knew it. Tesla knew it. Capitalism is not the evil the Left likes to make it out to be. Socialism, on the other hand, is evil. Stealing money and giving to others is nothing short of theft. Just because it is legal does not mean it is not theft.

Finally, this philosophy creates an “us versus them” environment. Because I do not belong in a victim group or am in a lower victim class, my views and life is irrelevant. Do you think I am going to sit easy with that? Nope, I am not and I am going to tell you. Not to mention, I am going to have very little respect for your opinion. That lack of respect will turn to anger, anger turns to hate and hate usually leads to violence.

That’s where we are heading.

 

Why this Philosophy is Dangerous

Here’s the big problem with Intersectionality and Identity Politics: it’s dangerous. Because the victim classes believe that the sins of the United States never went away, the system is still corrupt. That means that the system needs to be changed. As we have seen with the Black Lives Matter philosophy (and Antifa, for that matter) we know what they want to replace it with: Socialism. The destruction of capitalism, opportunity, freedoms, the Constitution, speech, religion; all gone. The government will control all and we will be at the mercy of its whim.

How close our we to this? Very. The Left is very close to controlling the government. If President Trump does not mellow out on the Tweeting thing, he could very well lose this election. His poll numbers are not looking great and Joe Biden’s strategy of hiding is his basement and not screwing up is working (though I think that is going to end soon).

Finally, the most dangerous aspect of this philosophy is cancel culture. In the beginning, cancel culture was actually kind of funny. People would call for the firing of Conservatives like Sean Hannity and Tucker Carlson. Of course, by people who have never seen their shows. They cancelled things like Aunt Jamima and scream that chess is racist. That is a thing because the white pieces always go first (ugh!).

But, right before our eyes, cancel culture is morphing. Looting and domestic terrorism is cancelling businesses by destroying them. Companies like the NFL, NBA, Google, Twitter and Microsoft has bent the knee to these groups and rejected anyone who rejects the radical beliefs of Black Lives Matter. Our statues are being torn down. Our flag is being burned.

This is happening now.

But it is getting worse. People are being silenced on social media because of their beliefs. People are being doxxed and fire from their jobs, ruining their careers. People are being attacked because of the color of their hats, saying the wrong thing or just looking different. Normal, law-abiding citizens are being left unprotected because the police departments are being told to stand down and defunded. This has led to the serious injury and deaths of the innocent. Think I am exaggerating? Look up David Dorn, David McAtee, Chris Beaty, Dorean Murrell, Italia Kelly, Marquis Tousant, Patrick Underwood, Calvin Horton Jr., James Scurlock, Javar Harrell, Barry Perkins III, Jorge Gomez, Jose Gutierrez, Victor Cazares Jr. and Marvin Francois. Just to name a few. I did not mention the hundreds that are getting shot in places like Chicago, New York and Los Angeles simply because the police have been told to stand down.

This is happening now. What could happen in the future?

Could I get into trouble with the law because I say the wrong thing? Use the wrong pronoun? Pray to my God? Complain about the government? Not want to give up my gun? Be able to reason why our government is wrong? Seem far fetched? They are already doing that in countries like China, Russia, North Korea and, to a smaller extent, Germany, Canada, Japan and France. Why don’t we think it could not happen here?

Could I be arrested for my race? Being part of the “privileged class”? Because I reason, pray and see injustice? could I be imprisoned in a work camp? Lose my family, career and life because people do not like what I am saying today? It happened in countries like Russia (Soviet Union), China, Venezuela, Cuba, North Korea, and Germany.  Why don’t we think it could not happen here?

Folks, this is the endpoint of cancel culture. It has been done before. It never ended well.

This is something I cannot get behind. This is something I will fight against.

 

https://www.cjr.org/language_corner/intersectionality.php#:~:text=%E2%80%9CIntersectionality%E2%80%9D%20was%20coined%20in%201989,overlapping%20discrimination%20unique%20to%20them
https://www.vox.com/identities/2016/12/2/13718770/identity-politics
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/identity-politics/
https://blacklivesmatter.com/what-we-believe/
https://fox6now.com/2020/06/08/deadly-unrest-here-are-the-people-who-have-died-amid-george-floyd-protests-across-us/
.

 

https://7news.com.au/sport/sydney-radio-station-asks-if-chess-is-racist-because-white-always-moves-first-c-1121419

 

 

 

 

spacer

Episode 184 – History is Us

History is us
Destroying it destroys us.
Can’t let it happen.

 

The Destruction of History

I did something weird this week. In fact, I bet I will be put on some FBI watch list after purchases are scanned. I bought Margaret Sanger’s Women and the New Race and Howard Zinn’s A People’s History of the United States. 

Margaret Sanger is a eugenicist, racist, abortionist and founder of Planned Parenthood. She believed that abortion should be required for anyone who would weaken society. That includes babies born with Downs Syndrome, physical disabilities and…wait for it…people of color, especially blacks. That’s not a mistake. She’s considered an American hero to the Left. They, conveniently, left out the fact that she was an ardent Marxist and wanted to breed blacks out of American society. This is an example of the Left’s revisionist history and I wanted to read her own words.

Howard Zinn’s book is being sent to schools as required reading. It has been touted as the history book by Will Hunting from the Oscar winning movie, Good Will Hunting (I like Matt Damon as an actor, by the way). He was also a Marxist and socialist. He said the American Indians were innocent and loving giving Columbus the chance to slaughter them at will. The conflicts with the Soviet Union, Cuba, Korea and Vietnam were because of American imperialism. Our kids are reading this crap. This is an example of the Left’s revisionist history and I wanted to read his own words.

Today, we have a bunch of snot-nosed kids tearing down statues because… not sure. I mean, I get it if they were tearing down statues of Robert E. Lee or of Jefferson Davis or even of John Adams. But Abraham Lincoln, who started a war that led to the death of 700,000 Americans to end slavery and was killed by a… um… Democrat? And Ulysses S. Grant, who was an ardent anti-slavery guy and helped pen the 15th Amendment? And Francis Scot Key, who wrote the poem that ended up being the Star Spangled Banner? Or Theodore Roosevelt, who was the most popular President in U.S. history and really didn’t do anything that could be seen as controversial.

Here’s the thing: the radicals we are seeing in the streets right now, encouraged by the Left, don’t care about what statue they destroy. Their goal is not to destroy Confederate statues, which can be understood a bit. Their goal is to destroy American history. The Left cannot have history in America if they want to change the institution of America.

Here’s the thing: America was a bad place at one time. We fixed it. Are we perfect? No. But this country is as close to perfect than any other country in human history. We had slavery. We had Jim Crow. We didn’t let women vote. We interred Asian Americans during World War II. We had Watergate. We supported terrible regimes. But we saw our sins and we dealt with them. That is our history.

Here’s the problem with the Left: They want complete change of our institutions and philosophy. They want to control the economy, media, art, education and healthcare. They want a all-controlling government that determines every aspect of our lives. They do not want us to think of ourselves as individuals but as a collective, without individual identity and whose value is only based on what he can do for the collective.

They proclaim the need for love and togetherness. They claim that the sins of the United States can be solved by working together. They claim we can all have homes, money, education, healthcare, televisions, Internet and iPhones. Our collective love can solve crime so we will not need those evil police. They claim we can achieve world peace through globalism so that we do not need a military to solve international conflicts.

This sounds great. Heck, it sounds like The Communist Manifesto by Marx and Engels. I read the pamphlet when I was 20 years old and it made sense. I can see why kids think it is a good philosophy. Heck, in college, I took a class in the different religions and thought all of them were good. It made me question my Christianity.

I can see why there is a push to get rid of our way of life and replace it with a philosophy that promises Utopia.

Here’s the problem: History. World history and the United States history.

There has never been a communist, socialist or marxist country that has not led to tyranny, imprisonment, starvation and death. The Soviet Union, Nazi Germany (which was a socialist country), Italy (which is fascist country), North Korea, China, Venezuela, Vietnam, Cuba and assorted Central American countries have tried to create Marx’s utopia. They all ended up in tyranny and dictatorships, imprisoning or killing anyone who does not comply.

What does the Left do? Revisionist history. I have children in my life. They don’t know what the Soviet Union is. They don’t know what the Cold War was. They don’t know what the Berlin Wall was. They know about Hitler because he was a fascist (they don’t know what that is) because Conservatives have been tagged as fascists (which makes not sense). But they don’t know anything about Lennin, Staling or Mao, each of who have killed far more than Hitler has.

And educators teach about wonderful “socialist” countries like Norway, Switzerland, Sweden and the Netherlands. This is the great lie. These countries are not socialist and never have been. These countries continue to point out they are not socialist. But the Left continues to revise world history in order to push their narrative.

The next big problem the Left has is American history. And this is far more problematic for them. They are attacking the problem revise and eliminate.

The revision of the history of the United States has been going on for decades. Howard Zinn’s book, A People’s History of the United States, was first published in 1980 and took society like a whirl wind. It made the United States out to be an imperialist country that is the cause of all the evil in the world. Zinn is a well-known Marxist but not much of a historian. His book is rife with mistakes and exaggerations. Real historians have debunked the book over and over again. But this book continues to be used in schools and is a reference in colleges. This type of history makes every event, whether good or bad, into something that had evil undertones. Columbus’ discovery was not a great achievement but was to enslave the peaceful American Indians and rape the country of resources. World War II was not to end the tyranny of Japan and the genocide in Germany but was to quench our imperialist appetite. This is all crap, of course, but people are buying it.

The New York Times 1619 Project is another example of revisionist history but it does something a bit different. This Pulitzer Prize winning piece (of crap) decides to ignore history all together. It states the history of the United States started in 1619 with the first black slaves arriving on our shores. Mind you, there was no United States in 1619. It tries to convince people (and is doing a good job) that the United States was founded on slavery and oppression and that we have never left that philosophy. That the country in 2020 is no different than it was in 1619. It ignores the creation Declaration of Independence and Constitution. It ignores the philosophies of the Founding Fathers when it comes to slavery and only focuses on their sins. It ignores the fact that there has been slavery throughout world history (and it remains today) and that slavery is a uniquely American trait. It ignores the 600,000 people that died in the Civil War we had to eliminate slavery. It ignores the Emancipation Proclamation that was supported by most of the country. It ignores the 15th and 16th Amendments that gave blacks freedom and right to vote. It ignores Women’s Suffrage that gave women the right to vote. It ignores the Civil Rights Act that ended the Jim Crow laws.

It does not see the United States as a country that saw evil and transformed and grew. It chooses to see the United States as continually as evil as some of our beliefs back in the 17th century. In fact, it sees us as the arbiters of that evil. In other words, we started it. And the best way to end the world’s evil is to end the system that started it and continues to promulgate it.

This is just crazy. There has always been evil in the world. The United States has spent its entire history fighting the evils in the world and from within. And it has done a great job of it. This series of essays is complete crap. Heck, the New York Times had to run a series of corrections on the historical “facts”. But this did not stop the essay from winning a Pulitzer Prize.

This project is what is leading the youth to destroy statues today. I have more thoughts on this in a later article. This is to destroy our history. That’s because those statues represent the changes that our country has gone through to become the greatest country in world history. Yes, it is in the guise of racist cops and American systemic racism. But, then, why tear down the statues of Abraham Lincoln, Ulysses Grant and Theodore Roosevelt? Because they are symbols of progress in the United States. And the Left cannot allow any knowledge of progress or transformation in this country because it would mean that we have grown as a nation and are not terrible.

The Left wants to destroy us. They use uneducated children to do their deeds. Children that don’t know our history, have accomplished nothing, want everything for free and are filled with the ideas of an unattainable utopia. All so that a few elitist tyrants can gain power.

My advice: Always question interpreted history. Beware of any history that goes to extremes like Howard Zinn’s history does. No country is completely evil. Especially this one.

And do not be silent. We’re passed that now. When someone says something stupid, point out

 

 

spacer

Episode 183 – It Only Takes That First Shot

No agreement here.
We must agree to disagree,
Or chaos ensues.

 

Is Civil War in our Future?

I was talking to someone who lived through the turbulent 60s and asked her how it compares today. I was born in 1968 so don’t know anything about the 60s. She said things are far worse today. She said people then were more unhappy about the Vietnam War and government corruption. There was racism and anger about the struggle of implementing the Civil Rights Act.

She said that anger went through the 1970s. Watergate, the oil crisis, the Iranian hostages and an economic recession. It was a mess. And I haven’t even mentioned Disco.

But, throughout this time, there was never a thought that the country was in crisis. There was never a serious thought of overthrowing the government. The news media did not lionize the hippies. Though sympathetic to their cause, the Black Panthers were seen as a criminal group.

There was still a lot that united us. Iran was holding 49 Americans and our people wanted them back. There was the Cold War which gave us a united enemy. And the Soviet Union was evil. I haven’t even mentioned we all agreed disco was evil.

But we got through that. The United States hockey team beat the Soviets in Olympic hockey. Ronald Reagan established American pride. The first space shuttle launched. The economy grew. We became respected militarily. The Soviet Union fell. It was the start of thirty years of relative peace (except for that 9/11 thing but even that we all agreed on).

Today,  we are in trouble. That’s because we have the same distinct groups but we are so far apart that there can not be a center.  What do I mean by that?

Abortion is a great example. In fact, it might be one of the reason we are not so close anymore. There appears to only be one of two choices when it comes to abortion: for or against. I, along with a lot of other people, will argue that an absolute truth is very hard to find. Abortion in no different. There are compelling arguments on both side of the argument. I must point out that the child being “just” a clump of cells is, scientifically, not one of them. It went from a black-and-white issue to a shades-of-gray issue.

And I treat it like that.

Let’s just say in the case of rape. I do not believe abortion is a great idea in the case of rape. It’s not important why I think that now. Maybe we can talk about that later. But, I do see how one can be for abortion in the cases of rape. And that’s fine. This argument is used all the time by the Left. I tell the Lefty that I would vote for abortion for rape victims if he would vote to eliminate abortions of convenience. The answer I receive tells me about whether this person could work with me.

There are always shades-of-gray. But not with the Left and where they want to go. I can’t go for that. That’s really bad. I think this lack of dialog and understanding will lead to a cultural Civil War. And I don’t mean we yell at each other. I mean people are going to die.

Let’s talk about some of the things that there is no agreement on.

 

 

spacer

Episode 182 Show Notes – More to the Story

News media lies.
Google takes the bait again.
Trump is attacking

 

Looking More Political by the Second

This Rayshard Brooks thing is going to get bad. I think that the DA of Fulton County, Paul Howard Jr., should probably recuse himself to try to save face.

Information has come out today that really puts a bad light on this case and Paul Howard:

Howard said that a taser is not a deadly weapon and is not justification for deadly force. But two weeks ago, Howard said that the use of a taser by police was using deadly force. He was referring to a incident where police used a taser on a violent woman during an arrest. In that case, which happened on June 2, he charged a police officer.

Howard said that Devin Brosnan, the other police officer on the scene that received a concussion and taser burns from the peaceful Brooks, has no intention of pleading guilty to any charge and no intention of testifying for the state against Officer Rolfe. He said that in front of his client and Brosnan appeared with a battered face.

Finally, the Georgia Bureau of Investigation (GBI for short) said they are still continuing their investigation and have not come up with a determination. They also said that Howard never consulted them with his findings and the charges.

Oops.

What’s also coming out is the life of Rayshard Brooks. And he’s not the jovial loving guy Howard is making him out to be.

  • He blew a .108 in his test. That’s over the drunk driving limit.
  • The charges to which Brooks pleaded guilty and for which he was still on probation dated back to August 2014.
  • He was convicted on four counts – False Imprisonment, Simple Battery/Family, Battery Simple and Felony Cruelty/Cruelty to Children.
  • Brooks had not been in trouble since 2016 until last December when he went to Ohio without informing his probation officer – but the case was dismissed.

 

Not so jovial and nonviolent.

But Paul Howard has his own problems:

  • He has huge turmoil in the department he is running. According to his competitor for the DA position, he lost 115 lawyers in the last 2 years and his environment is toxic.
  • He is under investigation for sexual harassment by a member of the Human Resources department.
  • The GBI is investigating him for the disappearance of grant money that was sent to his department. That money has been alleged to have added to his salary.
  • He is currently looking at being primaried in the next election in November.

 

Does this look like a diversion to satisfy his voting base?

https://www.dailywire.com/news/da-says-brooks-wasnt-threat-toward-cop-he-shot-taser-at-said-two-weeks-ago-taser-is-considered-a-deadly-weapon
https://www.dailywire.com/news/attorney-for-officer-devin-brosnan-debunks-claims-client-is-state-witness-unloads-on-d-a-paul-howard
https://www.dailywire.com/news/georgia-bureau-of-investigation-responds-to-d-a-s-charges-we-werent-consulted-investigation-not-over
https://www.dailywire.com/news/atlanta-police-officers-not-responding-to-calls-in-multiple-zones-comes-after-d-a-charged-officer-with-murder-in-rayshard-brooks-case
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8431801/Rayshard-Brooks-probation-faced-going-prison-charged-DUI.html

 

 

It’s About Time

Google has threatened to ban the conservative news and opinion site The Federalist from profiting off online advertising through Google Ads for violating the tech giant’s conditions against “inappropriate content.”

NBC News first reported that Google had banned The Federalist and “far-right” website ZeroHedge for “advertising platform over policy violations found in the comments section of stories about recent Black Lives Matter protests.”

Google told the Daily Wire:

“To be clear, The Federalist is not currently demonetized. We do have strict publisher policies that govern the content ads can run on, which includes comments on the site. This is a longstanding policy.”

Apparently, a spokesman had made the comment to NBC News which led to the story:

“We have strict publisher policies that govern the content ads can run on and explicitly prohibit derogatory content that promotes hatred, intolerance, violence or discrimination based on race from monetizing. When a page or site violates our policies, we take action. In this case, we’ve removed both sites’ ability to monetize with Google.”

Google said this was not the case and walked back the comment. But, apparently, Google lied and had tagged The Federalist with hate content. The Federalist refused to comment.

This is not the first time that Google, and its subsidiaries such as YouTube, have been accused of targeting Conservative content. Steven Crowder of Louder with Crowder has continually had his content banned and demonetized due to hate speech while allowing far Left content such as Vox to continue, unabated.

Last month, two doctors had their content banned from YouTube because their medical opinions of the COVID-19 virus countered the World Health Organization, an organization that has been wrong about the virus from day one but is an avid supporter of the communist Chinese government (where the virus originated).

But Google is not the only social media company that has been targeting Conservatives. Twitter has been known to suspend Conservative Tweeters such as Candace Owens and James Woods. They also fact-check Donald Trump. Yet, Left wing pundants, who have said some pretty atrocious things without getting so much as a warning.

The problem is, as the election gets closer, the suspensions are getting more frequent and more obvious.

The Department of Justice is prepping legislation to roll back protections for big tech companies and make them more accountable for content posted on their sites.

The DOJ is expected to introduce a bill to Congress as soon as Wednesday targeting tech companies and social media platforms’ protections under Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act, according to The Wall Street Journal.

Section 230 protects a wide variety of web services, platforms, and content providers from liability for outside content that passes through their servers. The law, passed in the early days of the internet, is a key legal protection for large social media platforms and internet search engines. Any change in the law’s protections could drastically affect the way those companies operate.

Essentially, these companies are going to be liable in the same way as newspapers that spread libelous material.

It’s about time.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/google-threatens-to-ban-the-federalist-from-ad-platform-for-comment-section-violations
https://www.dailywire.com/news/breaking-us-justice-department-to-propose-rolling-back-protections-for-big-tech
https://www.dailywire.com/news/cruz-unloads-on-google-over-debacle-in-failed-nbc-news-hit-on-the-federalist-gets-ag-barr-involved
https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/google-bans-two-websites-its-ad-platform-over-protest-articles-n1231176

spacer

Episode 181 Show Notes – Nothing Like Lawyers that Can’t Read

Asia is a mess.
The Supreme Court botches it.
Trump tries to fix cops.

 

North Korea is at It Again

North Korean officials blew up an office building on Tuesday that it used as place to work with South Korean officials, a move that experts say is a significant escalation between the two countries. The move comes after North Korea had threatened to invade the demilitarized zone with its military, and now the South has moved its joint chiefs of staff to a “combat control office.”

“South Korean border guards heard an explosion and then saw smoke rising from Kaesong, the North Korean town where the building was located,” The New York Times reported. “The building appeared to be blown completely apart in a blast so powerful that windows in nearby buildings were also shattered, according to video footage from a South Korean surveillance camera on the border.”

“The destruction of a building meant to facilitate dialogue, paid for by South Korea and sitting on North Korean soil, is highly symbolic. It may mark a turning point in relations between two countries that had committed themselves to ‘a new era of peace’ fewer than three years ago,” CNN reported. “North Korea framed its decision to destroy the liaison office as a retaliatory measure after a group of defectors used balloons to send anti-North Korean leaflets north of the DMZ.”

The north-south joint liaison office was completely ruined on Tuesday. The relevant field of the DPRK put into practice the measure of completely destroying the north-south joint liaison office in the Kaesong Industrial Zone in the wake of cutting off all the communication liaison lines between the north and the south, corresponding to the mindset of the enraged people to surely force human scum and those, who have sheltered the scum, to pay dearly for their crimes. At 14:50, the liaison office was tragically ruined with a terrific explosion.

“South Korea’s Joint Chiefs of Staff has moved to a ‘combat control office,’ while the Ministry of National Defense stated it is ready to ‘respond strongly’ to any military provocations from North Korea.”

Earlier in the day, North Korean officials threatened to send its military into the demilitarized zone, which divides the two nations, and said that it was studying “an action plan” for the move.

This should be a surprise to no one. This is North Korea’s schtick.

They are in trouble. Their nation is going down the toilet. Hearing the threatening words of Kim Yo-jong, sister of Kim Jong-un, tells me that Un may not have power anymore. He may be the vegetable we thought he might be after his surgery or he’s dead. Don’t forget, Un pulled the same crap after he took power when his father died.

And their military is not threatening anyone. Their soldiers are starving and they are using the same technology from the Korean War in the 1950s. We can’t even be sure their nuclear program has life after that explosion at their nuclear facility last year.

Lastly, I doubt that China will have anything to do with any conflict, especially involving the United States, to try to help the North Koreans. Outright fights has not been what China has been about and thins could be messy.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/watch-north-korea-blows-up-liaison-office-it-shared-with-south-korea-north-threatens-to-invade-dmz-south-goes-to-combat-control-office

 

 

So Much for Being a Contextualist

In a 6-3 vote, the Supreme Court ruled Monday that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 includes heretofore unimagined employment protections on the basis of sexual preference and “sexual identity.” Neil Gorsuch, appointed to replace the late originalist Antonin Scalia, wrote the majority opinion, joined by squish John Roberts and the rest of the Court’s liberals. Conservative justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Brett Kavanaugh dissented.

This is, without a doubt, one of the worse rulings of the new “Conservative” Supreme Court to date. And it’s bad because it is simply just wrong.

But this ruling has some major issues.

The first one is that homosexual and trans rights under the Civil Rights Act did not apply. In fact, it was discussed back then but it was left out of the law. There are a couple of reasons:

  • Homosexuality and transsexuals are not seen as a sex but as a behavior. That behavior was not known unless the individual made it public. A man was a man no matter what sex he is attracted to.
  • The second reason is that some institutions see the behavior as abhorrent and against their moral compass. Religious institutions like churches, temples and mosques have argued against the ruling. But there are also other organizations that may have morals issues with it such as Hobby Lobby.

 

This is what is most disturbing about this ruling. It is making a law that was not there before. This was not stated in the 1964 Civil Rights Bill. It is no where in the Constitution. The Supreme Court has created a law out of thin air.

We have a Congress for that. The Supreme Court’s job is to rule on the Constitutionality of a law, not make law. If the House of Representatives thought this was a thing, they should have come up with a law. It is not the Supreme Court’s job to make law.

What’s worse is what this law does not do. It does not explain what will happen when a gay man or woman or a transsexual goes to a church and tries to push his/her lifestyle as something that needs to be treated equally with the rest of the believers. We already know that the LGBT has attacked bakeries and places like that that have held a more Conservative view of sexuality.

See, what this law does is describe a gay man as a separate sex or gender instead of a behavior and lifestyle choice. In other words, there is a difference between a gay man and a straight man. That gay man cannot control his gayness anymore than a black man can control the amount of melanin in his skin. What’s worse, a gay man has now been defined as a member of a victim group.

This is a very dangerous ruling and it leaves more questions than answers. It also takes the creation of law away from the Congress and makes it a function of the Supreme Court. Suddenly, the Supreme Court has become the All Ruling branch of government.

No one is talking about this.

Another thing is shows is how lousy Republicans are at choosing justices. Chief Justice Roberts hasn’t made a Conservative ruling yet. Justice Goerseche went completely against his contextualist views and voted his “heart.” Even Justice Kavanaugh is kind of iffy with his rulings.

If Trump wins in November, he is going to get two more Supreme Court nominations, possibly three. Breyer is going to retire and Thomas probably will retire. Ginsberg is either going to retire or she’s going to die. I don’t know what’s keeping that gal alive.

Trump needs to get three Constitutional Conservatives. Real ones like Amy Comey Barratt and stop trying to get moderates that will have an easy time getting through the Senate.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/knowles-the-revolution-marches-on

 

It’s a Start

On Tuesday, President Trump signed an Executive Order on Police reform. Listen:

Before the order, he invited many family members who were affected by police violence. This was a closed-door session. No photo op, just a discussion and a way for the people to vent to the most powerful man in the country. This is a really good thing.

The Executive Order hits on several topics:

Sec. 2. Certification and Credentialing. (a) State and local law enforcement agencies must constantly assess and improve their practices and policies to ensure transparent, safe, and accountable delivery of law enforcement services to their communities. Independent credentialing bodies can accelerate these assessments, enhance citizen confidence in law enforcement practices, and allow for the identification and correction of internal deficiencies before those deficiencies result in injury to the public or to law enforcement officers.

(b) The Attorney General shall, as appropriate and consistent with applicable law, allocate Department of Justice discretionary grant funding only to those State and local law enforcement agencies that have sought or are in the process of seeking appropriate credentials from a reputable independent credentialing body certified by the Attorney General.

(c) The Attorney General shall certify independent credentialing bodies that meet standards to be set by the Attorney General. Reputable, independent credentialing bodies, eligible for certification by the Attorney General, should address certain topics in their reviews, such as policies and training regarding use–of-force and de-escalation techniques; performance management tools, such as early warning systems that help to identify officers who may require intervention; and best practices regarding community engagement. The Attorney General’s standards for certification shall require independent credentialing bodies to, at a minimum, confirm that:

(ii) the State or local law enforcement agency’s use-of-force policies prohibit the use of chokeholds — a physical maneuver that restricts an individual’s ability to breathe for the purposes of incapacitation — except in those situations where the use of deadly force is allowed by law.

Sec. 3. Information Sharing. (a) The Attorney General shall create a database to coordinate the sharing of information between and among Federal, State, local, tribal, and territorial law enforcement agencies concerning instances of excessive use of force related to law enforcement matters, accounting for applicable privacy and due process rights.

Sec. 4. Mental Health, Homelessness, and Addiction. (a) Since the mid-twentieth century, America has witnessed a reduction in targeted mental health treatment. Ineffective policies have left more individuals with mental health needs on our Nation’s streets, which has expanded the responsibilities of law enforcement officers. As a society, we must take steps to safely and humanely care for those who suffer from mental illness and substance abuse in a manner that addresses such individuals’ needs and the needs of their communities. It is the policy of the United States to promote the use of appropriate social services as the primary response to individuals who suffer from impaired mental health, homelessness, and addiction, recognizing that, because law enforcement officers often encounter such individuals suffering from these conditions in the course of their duties, all officers should be properly trained for such encounters.

Sec. 5. Legislation and Grant Programs. (a) The Attorney General, in consultation with the Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy and the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, shall develop and propose new legislation to the Congress that could be enacted to enhance the tools and resources available to improve law enforcement practices and build community engagement.

Sec. 6. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or
(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
You can read the entire Executive Order in the CNN link below.
It is a good order and should satisfy everyone. The big thing about this is the database that will keep track of instances of police abuse. This is something that has been talked about for years but no one has done anything about.
This order also does not overstep the President’s bounds into reaching into states, cities and communities. The President wants to encourage these smaller governments through grants a resources. This is a very good thing because the President is walking a fine line when it comes to over reach.
I also like what he wants to do with mental illness and drug addiction. I believe the police should be back up for mental health professionals and shouldn’t be the first responders. Maybe even create a separate police force specifically trained to deal with that.

There are somethings that are missing:

  • Police unions have been a disaster. They need to be reformed.
  • A more regimented training should have been pushed. I think our police are terribly under-trained.
  • The review process for determining police abuse or not is not addressed. A lot of local review panels are political in nature. This has led to bad judgments. The Rayshard Brooks incident in Atlanta is an example of this.

 

But it’s a good start. And it is an attempt by Trump that has been asked for but never been addressed before.

Van Jones, a Left-wing commentator for CNN, agreed:

He’s right. I don’t like the “We are winning,” thing because this is about all of us, not just blacks. I do not see blacks as African American of black. I see them as America. That’s OK. I don’t see myself as a man, white, Irish or cis-gender. I see myself as an American. Period.

Of course, the Democrats hate it. Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, Joe Biden and Jim Clyburn (the House Majority Whip and part of the Congressional Black Caucus) hated it. But I am not going to waste time on them. Let me list the reasons why:

  • Jim Clyburn – Been in the House of Representatives for 27 years. Bitch a lot but did nothing.
  • Nancy Pelosi – Been in the House of Representatives for 34 years, was Speaker twice. Bitched a lot but did nothing.
  • Chuck Schumer – Been in the House of Representatives and the Senate for 39 years. Bitched a lot but did nothing.
  • Joe Biden – Served as a Senator for 36 years and Vice President for 8 years for a total of 44 years. Co-wrote and sponsored a crime bill that he now denies. Served as Vice President to the first black President, bitched a lot and has done nothing.

 

I really don’t give a damn what these people think. It’s a good executive order.

 

 

https://www.dailywire.com/news/watch-trump-signs-executive-order-on-police-reform-your-loved-ones-will-not-have-died-in-vain
https://www.dailywire.com/news/chuck-schumer-rips-trumps-executive-order-on-police-reform

 

This is a Political Sacrifice

Just in:

Garrett Rolfe, the Atlanta police officer fired after the killing of Rayshard Brooks last week, now faces charges including felony murder aggravated assault , which could potentially lead to the death penalty, a Georgia district attorney announced Wednesday. Also, Devon Brosnan, the second officer at the scene, was given three charges including aggravated assault. He has agreed to testify for the prosecution against Rolfe.

Included in the charges was a count of aggravated assault because one of his bullets hit an occupied car.

Fulton County District Attorney Paul Howard Jr. said at a news conference Wednesday:

“We’ve concluded, at the time Mr. Brooks was shot, that he did not pose an immediate threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or officers.”

Howard said Brooks did not receive medical attention for more than 2 minutes in his press conference Wednesday.

“Officer Rolfe actually kicked Mr. Brooks while he laid on the ground,” Howard alleged, The officers also allegedly stood on his shoulder as he bled on the ground.”

Rolfe’s attorney said:

“Officer Rolfe heard a sound like a gunshot and saw a flash in front of him. Fearing for his safety, and the safety of the civilians around him, Officer Rolfe dropped his Taser and fired his service weapon.”

Rolfe, they said, rendered aid, called an ambulance and performed CPR on Brooks.

This is a travesty and looks like nothing more than a political charge. There is no way he is going to get a murder charge especially when Rolfe’s attorney gets a hold of the jury.

Remember: 52 cops and the police chief resigned their positions after Rolfe’s firing. Expect a lot more. This is a political rush-to-judgment. This is an overreach in every sense of the word. There wasn’t even a grand jury summoned to see if the evidence matched the crime.

And I think Howard knew it. He looked nervous and unsure of himself. The reaction of the news media (they all let out an “Ooo”) says this might not have been a good decision. But Howard looked like he had no choice. He is up for re-election and he is facing corruption charges. Mix that with the fact the protesters said Mayor Bottoms could be kicked out of office in the next election and this overreach is understandable. And unjust.

It’s a bad thing when we start using justice to virtue signal.

 

https://www.foxnews.com/us/rayshard-brooks-atlanta-officer-garrett-rolfe-murder-charges-death-penalty-eligible

spacer

Episode 180 Show Notes – Not the Same Thing

Here we go again.
But far from George Floyd’s killing.
Black Lives Matters grows!

 

Not Again

Rayshard Brooks, a 27-year-old African American man, was fatally shot by Atlanta police Friday evening after officers were called on-scene due to reports that a man had fallen asleep while parked in the Wendy’s drive-thru, according to the Georgia Bureau of Investigations.

Brooks was transported to the hospital and died after surgery, said the GBI. One of the two officers experienced an injury of unknown severity during the altercation, but was subsequently released from the hospital.

 

Atlanta City Council Member Antonio Brown said

“This is why people are outraged in this city,. It’s incredibly important that our police, especially now, don’t resort to firing a gun – not unless someone is firing a gun right at you.”

Stacy Abrams Tweeted:

The Atlanta mayor fired the officer who shot Brooks and put the other officer on Administrative Leave.

But this started the firestorm. Protesters started crowding the streets in Atlanta. Of course, protesters turned to rioters. Oh, and they had great reason for their violence.

Here are a couple of protesters in Atlanta. Listen carefully because the audio has a lot of interference:

So, what these guys are saying is that there will be violence if these cops are not arrested immediately. That Brooks was a peaceful guy who was being harassed. He was a father and husband. A loving human being. Another example of an “unarmed” African American whose life was snuffed out by those Nazi white storm troopers of the Georgia police force.

There’s just one problem: The evidence does not show any of this. This just looks like more political grandstanding!

Oops! I smell lawsuits.

 

The Evidence

There were several views of the incident released. Two by police body cams, one by the Wendy’s security camera and one by a pedestrian’s cell phone.

The police footage was released to today and one can see that the images are consistent with the civilian images. The Wendy’s footage, which was the first video I saw, gave me all the information I needed to see. The body cam footage from the police just confirmed what I saw.

The body cam footage was about forty-five minutes. The shooting was covered in the last minutes and a half. I’ve watched all the footage for you. All hour and a half. Unlike what the Left is pushing, Brooks was not an innocent who the cops decided to pick on because he was  lack.

The police were called to a local Wendy’s restaurant because a man (Brooks) had fallen asleep in the drive thru lane. The police officer showed off and woke him up, telling Brooks to finding a parking space. Brooks, before moving his car, fell back asleep. The police officer woke him up again and had Brooks park his car, which he did. Immediately, he fell asleep.

The police officer went back into his car and could be heard saying, “What do I do now?” He knew what he had to do when he found out the car was a rental car and not his own.

After a few minutes, the officer got out of the car and started questioning Brooks. Brooks admitted that he had a drink or two but could not name when or what he had. The officer told him to stay in his car and he called it in, calling for a DUI specialist. Brooks kept apologizing and wanted to talk. The officer just told him to stay in his car and everything would be OK.

This confrontation lasted for twenty minutes. Brooks was never put against the squad car, never handcuffed and never searched. His keys were not taken and, from what I saw, the officer never even looked in the car.

The officer certified in evaluating DUIs arrived and started the field sobriety test. All the time, there were no threats and both officers were very polite. They even tried to make him feel at ease with his situation.

When the test was complete, the officer told Brooks he was under arrest for DUI and tried to cuff him. That’s when the struggle ensued. You could not see the fight from the body cam but you could see it from a bystander’s cell phone footage and the Wendy’s security cam footage.

Brooks had both officers on the ground and got the best of the. Both officers were on their backs and Brooks was swinging his fist.

One officer tried to taze him but missed. Brooks took the taser and started running. One officer was running after him while the other was trying to get oriented. Brooks turned around and shot the taser at the officer. The officer had his taser and dropped his taser and shot three times. He hit Brooks twice in the back.

Brooks went to the hospital and died after surgery.

 

What I Think, and It Ain’t Going to be Popular

Dan Bongino said on Fox News:

“The worse option is to let this subject continue to engage in use of force against them [the officers], without stopping the episode.

“Sadly, it resulted in his death, but make no mistake, the use of force was controlled by one person, the individual who resisted arrest, stole the weapon, ran away and then pointed it at the officers, which is clear on the video.”

“Obviously a man died. That’s tragic. Nobody wants to see that, whether it’s on the police side, on the community side, anywhere, we get that. Having said that, I always ask the question when it comes to law enforcement issues for the people who are sadly ignorant of them, many of whom haven’t lived in the shoes of a law enforcement officer themselves: ‘Well, what would you do?’”

He went on to explain the situation.

“You have an individual suspected of being intoxicated… what do you do? You want to just let him go? Get him back in the car and mow down a family on the streets because he’s potentially drunk? So, let’s eliminate that as a really bad idea.”

“Now you’re going to arrest him and the subject clearly does not want to be arrested. OK, so let’s walk through, what do you do?”

“Well again, we can’t let him get back in the car, so we have to arrest him using force. Keep in mind, not force the police officers wanted, they don’t initiate it, the subject did.”

“The bad choice was to have to engage in a use-of-force episode with this individual who pointed a Taser back at a law-enforcement officer he had just punched in the face. It wasn’t a good option to have to engage with your firearm. There were no good options. He’s dead.”

I use the interview of Dan Bongino because Bongino used to be an NYPD officer and a Secret Service officer. He knows better than anybody.

The problem here is that the media is trying to compare the George Floyd killing with Rayshard Brooks. They are not even close. The police were being attacked, one was injured. Brooks took a police weapon and pointed it at an officer. There’s just not a lot of things the officer could have done.

Ericka Shield, the Atlanta Police Chief, resigned saying:

“For more than two decades, I have served alongside some of the finest men and women in the Atlanta Police Department. Out of a deep and abiding love for this City and this department, I offered to step aside as police chief,” said Shields in a statement.

“APD has my full support, and Mayor Bottoms has my support on the future direction of this department. I have faith in the Mayor, and it is time for the city to move forward and build trust between law enforcement and the communities they serve,” she said.

She has no chance in this whole thing and just said screw it. And she probably has it right.

This is what’s scary: cops are given no chance to enforce the law. Listen to what the Brooks attorney said on MSNBC:

They weren’t taking him in because he fell asleep. They were arresting him because he was drunk while driving. That is against the law. And what would have happened if he woke up and started driving home and he ran into a family and killed them? Would the cops have gotten into trouble for letting him go? Of course they would have.

The other question I have is why should they treat him differently? He broke the law. He’s go to jail for a couple of hours and be released. If he was white, should he have been let go?

And this lawyer totally ignores the violence of the situation!

A while back, a police officer, while I was watching a police situation, pulled me over and, at gun point, told me to get my hands up. I didn’t run or attack the cop (I didn’t do anything). I followed his orders. Guess what happened: I didn’t get shot! I’m pretty sure, if I took a swing at the officer, he would have shot me.

Just like Brooks.

What is scary is this is a call to end law. This is bad. It will bring us to the brink of anarchy if we say it is not criminal to commit crime.

The protesters also don’t seem to use reason when they go out and destroy things. That Wendy’s restaurant: It’s gone. Burned to the ground. Why?

Listen to the demands of the protesters:

Yeah, that’s a lie. We saw that in Minneapolis when all the officers were arrested and people continued to protest and loot.

But, what’s worse here, is that this officer, totally justified in his reaction, could and will be arrested and charged. His life ruined. All because he’s a cop and had to do his job. He didn’t look for a black guy to shoot. He was called in. The guy was not an innocent civilian. He was drunk driving, resisted arrest and threatened a cop with a weapon.

And he got shot. Being shot by a white cop does not make him innocent.

 

https://www.foxnews.com/us/atlanta-police-wendys-fire-suspect-rayshard-brooks
https://www.foxnews.com/us/atlanta-police-release-bodycam-video-leading-up-to-death-of-rayshard-brooks
https://www.foxnews.com/media/dan-bongino-atlanta-rayshard-brooks-shooting
https://www.dailywire.com/news/report-atlanta-man-fatally-shot-by-police-after-struggle-outside-drive-thru
https://www.dailywire.com/news/atlanta-police-chief-resigns-after-police-fatally-shoot-man-outside-drive-thru

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

spacer

Episode 179 Show Notes – Viva La Resistance!

Anarchy ain’t Free.
Communism does not work.
It never has worked.

 

What Is Wrong with Those People?

Antifa and BLM have gone insane in Seattle.

They have taken a seven block area of Seattle and declared it a separate state called the City Hall Autonomous Zone of the “country of CHAZ.

After a showdown between left-wing rioters and police on Sunday, Democratic Seattle Mayor Jenny Durkan announced late Monday an effort to “de-escalate” the situation by ordering the police to pull out of the East Precinct.

“In an effort to proactively de-escalate interactions between protestors and law enforcement outside the East Precinct, Chief Best and [Seattle Police Department] officers have removed barricades surrounding the East Precinct while safely securing the facility. Keeping demonstrations peaceful must be a joint effort between our community members and law enforcement. I am hopeful that tonight, with these operational changes, our city can peacefully move forward together.”

So, essentially, the mayor ordered the police to pull out, something confirmed by the police chief, Carmen Best, who is a black woman. When asked, the governor, Jay Insley, didn’t even know what was going on. That was a lie. He just wanted to ignore it.

What Do These People Want?

So these people came out with a list of demands. I knew this would be good and it turns out to be better than I thought.

Here’s the list:

  • Abolition of the police and court system.
  • Abolition of youth jails and free all prisoners.
  • Investigate past and current cases for police misconduct.
  • Reparations for victims of police brutality.
  • Doxing police officers who are accused of police brutality.
  • Re-trials for all people of color who were already convicted of a crime.
  • We demand that the City of Seattle and the State Government release any prisoner currently serving time for a marijuana-related offense and expunge the related conviction.
  • We demand the City of Seattle and State Government release any prisoner currently serving time just for resisting arrest if there are no other related charges, and that those convictions should also be expunged.
  • We demand that prisoners currently serving time be given the full and unrestricted right to vote, and for Washington State to pass legislation specifically breaking from Federal law that prevents felons from being able to vote.
  • We demand in replacement of the current criminal justice system the creation of restorative/transformative accountability programs as a replacement for imprisonment.
  • We demand that the Seattle Police Department, between now and the time of its abolition in the near future, empty its “lost and found” and return property owned by denizens of the city.
  • Socialized Health and Medicine for the City of Seattle.
  • Free public housing, because housing is a right, not a privilege.
  • Public education, to decrease the average class size in city schools and increase teacher salary.
  • Naturalization services for immigrants to the United States living here undocumented. (We demand they be called “undocumented” because no person is illegal.)
  • Rent control
  • Free college
  • Abolition of “homeless sweeps”.
  • Employ black doctors to treat black people.
  • Employ implicit bias training.
  • Removal of any statues that offend them.

 

 

What Do the Politicians and Media Say?

President Trump has said that if Seattle or the governor don’t do anything, he will take care of it. And it will happen fast.

The Mayor of Seattle doesn’t think anything of it. She doesn’t see it as anymore than a street festival. That’s crazy.

The media, at first, was all in on this. CNN and MSNBC made this seem like the greatest party on earth. But they have slowly switched their tune and now they are beginning to focus the Wuhan Flu again and how Trump is killing people.

Why? The optics are not as good as they thought they would be. Let’s talk about what is actually going on in CHAZ.

 

What is CHAZ Suppose to Be?

The People’s Republic of CHAZ is suppose to be what Karl Marx dreamed a communist Utopia is suppose to be.

It’s suppose to be a commune where people experience pure freedom. They work together in harmony. Grow their own food. Care for each other. Eliminate the nuclear family because it is patriarchal. Eliminate religion because it build walls around the freedom of the collective. All people are equal and all receive the same benefits.

There is no need for police because people are there for each other and love each other. Crime would be unheard of because the is nothing but communal love.

There is no need for economy because everyone works for everyone else. There’s no reason for money because one will be given the food they need, the housing they need and the healthcare they need.

There is no racism, sexism or bigotry. That’s because we are all equal and everyone will accept others for what they are or who they say they are.

 

So, What IS Happening?

So, things ain’t as grand as all that up there, no matter what the Seattle mayor is saying. In fact, instead of a Marxist Utopia, it is more like the disaster of Orwell’s Animal Farm.

Here’s what’s happening:

  • They ran out of food…because the homeless people were stealing it. They sent out a message the day after asking for vegan meat substitutes and gatorade.
  • They asked the city for pants and tents because they didn’t have any.
  • They were provided port-a-potties because they had no where to relieve themselves.
  • They started an agriculture spot in the middle of a park. They did this by throwing some dirt in the grass and putting, like, four types of plants on top of it. They didn’t even plant the plants, just threw them on the dirt.

 

Yeah, the co-op thing ain’t going too well. But what is worse is they are becoming exactly what they think they are fighting against.

Their leader is a rapper named Raz Simone. He has been accused of being more of a warlord than a leader. He has been accused of:

  • Creating his own police force with members carrying semiautomatic weapons (open carry is legal in Washington). He threatened one protester, saying he was the police and would “blow his head off” if he didn’t cooperate.
  • Setting up walls and fences to secure the “compound” and added armed security.
  • Required ID to get into CHAZ.
  • Extorting businesses for protection for money.
  • Has been accused of bigotry against gays and transgenders in media posts.
  • Will not negotiate with Black Lives Matter leadership for negotiation with the police.

 

Wow.

Because of his lack of direction, his power has waned. But the mess has continues.

  • Businesses are suffering. They are being exhorted
    There is no food.
    There is no shelter.
  • They have no expertise. They can’t grow or build anything.
  • Crime is high including robbery, assault and rape.
  • Police and medical services are still being requested but it takes three times the time for them to reach the victims.
  • The homeless are stealing from them.
  • The city is becoming a mess with trash and graffiti.

 

Though this whole thing was planned, its execution fell short. Or did it? Should we be surprised?

 

Nope, We Shouldn’t

There has never been a cooperative or commune that has ever been effective or long lasting. Because, in order to have a utopia, you need to have the perfect human beings. There are no human beings. We are petty, jealous, competitive, selfish and greedy. That works in capitalism, for the most part, because one does not have to depend on others.

But in a commune, it is imperative to reject all of the weaknesses of a human being. That’s just not going to happen.

Imagine if we tried to do this with a real country. Oh. that’s right. We have. In the USSR, North Korea, China, Germany, Italy and Venezuela. It’s called Communism and it has failed every time.

That’s what Black Live Matter’s crap is all about: Communism. They want to eliminate capitalism and implement socialism. They want all to be equal. They even use terms on the website like “collective” and “comrade”.

 

What Do I Think?

The mayor of Seattle and the governor of Washington don’t want to deal with this mess in CHAZ. They are Leftists and like their Marxist philosophy.

Funny thing: when this fails, the media will say that this is communism that wasn’t done right. But it was done just like the implementation in every country. The failure is only determined by population and land mass. There is no difference between the six blocks in Seattle and the millions of square miles in Russia.

Many people don’t know this but the Soviet Union was led by criminals. Lennin, Stalin, Khruschev, Beria and Putin were all involved with organized crime and most served prison time. These jerk-offs in Seattle are no different. They’re just thugs within a city that tries to appease them.

The city can’t appease them because they are criminals and thugs. Give a mouse a cookie…

I know Trump wants to take control of this situation and I know why. He is concerned for the businesses and the innocent citizens who don’t by the BS of the Left. They are victims and will get nothing when this whole thing is over. No one seems to care about them.

As  far as Durkan’s response that the President has no right under the Constitution to send troops into CHAZ, she needs to get herself some good attorneys who know something about the Constitution. We fought a civil war that killed 700,000 people because a part of the country wanted to succeed from the United States. If President Trump wants to storm CHAZ with a regiment of Green Berets, he can.

Of course, this isn’t serious. These are a bunch of uneducated children that have never accomplished anything in their lives throwing a temper tantrum.

So let them. Let them sit there for as long as they want and play communists. The leadership doesn’t seem to want to deal with it and are justifying it. The media is justifying it. Antifa and Black Life Matters is justifying it. Democrats are justifying it. So let it go. Let’s see how it turns out. Let’s see what communism has to offer. Let’s see success that only collectivism can create. Let’s see the Utopia!

Heck, we should disconnect the electricity, water and cell phone service so they can develop there own, more perfect technologies…together…as a collective.

 

https://www.dailywire.com/news/see-it-protesters-set-up-autonomous-zone-in-seattle-after-police-retreat-barricade-6-blocks-around-shuttered-precinct
https://www.dailywire.com/news/president-trump-warns-washington-governor-seattle-mayor-take-back-your-city-now-if-you-dont-do-it-i-will
https://www.foxnews.com/us/seattle-protests-armed-guards-local-businesses-extortion
https://medium.com/@seattleblmanon3/the-demands-of-the-collective-black-voices-at-free-capitol-hill-to-the-government-of-seattle-ddaee51d3e47
https://www.insider.com/what-is-seattle-autonomous-zone-george-floyd-protest-2020-6

 

 

 

 

 

 

https://www.dailywire.com/news/democrat-mayor-gives-govt-workers-40-hours-off-to-mourn-400-years-of-african-american-oppression-heres-the-email

 

spacer

Episode 176 Show Notes – Be Happy!

A forgotten tale.
The Wuhan Flu is a lie.
It is ALL Trump’s fault.

 

Why IS This Not Important?

The dominoes have been lined up and the first one has been flicked by the finger of truth. Yeah, I know. The metaphor is kind of think but not by much.

Rod Rosenstein was called by the Senate to discuss the FISA warrants, the scope memos and the appointment of Robert Mueller for the Trump Russia investigation. It did not go well for him.

What is being investigated:

  • What justification did anyone have to get a FISA warrant on Carter Page, an agent for the CIA?
  • Why were certain, rather important information, left out of the FISA application such as the Trump dossier, who paid for the dossier and that Carter Page was an agent for the CIA?
  • Why wasn’t Trump, who wasn’t investigated, not informed by the news?
  • Who lied?
  • Who leaked information to the press?
  • Why did Rosenstein approve the FISA application and expand the scope on such flimsy evidence?

 

This is a very complicated case. Dan Bongino wrote two books about it and everything he wrote, thought to be a conspiracy theory, turns out to be true. I’m thinking of listening to the books again.

Senator Ted Cruz from Texas came up with the slam of the hearing (from Grabien). Listen:

Everyone talks about the corruption of Richard Nixon. And he was corrupt. But, for the most part, he was corrupt. He committed and encouraged the crimes. And he was bound to get caught.

This is far worse. This is corruption within the system. This involves corruption with the Central Intelligence Agency. This is corruption within the FBI. This is corruption within the Department of Justice. This is corruption within the Obama Administration.

This is serious and really bad.

But it’s worse. It shows corruption within the main stream media.

This is the biggest story of this generation. The Nixon scandal is nothing compared to this. But the media, who has been falling for this Russia narrative for three years, refuses to investigate how they got “duped” for the last three years. You’d think they would want to get to the bottom of it.

The media doesn’t want to get in on it because they are part of this corruption. Luckily, with a 20% trust rate and the lack of ratings, the main stream media has been called out and shown for what they are. People don’t trust them and have stopped listening to what they are saying.

Heck, if it wasn’t for Fox News, no one would know what Don Lemon and Chris Cuomo are saying.

But the cards are down. The Senate is preparing subpoenas for Andrew McCabe and Jim Comey. Someone is going to get caught in a lie here.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/mike-lee-rod-rosenstein-stunning-admission-fisa-russia-probe

 

 

 

Yeah, This is a Good Idea

As usual, the Left wants to destroy society in order to “fix” the problems with the police. Well, they came up with a doozy. If the police are a problem, let’s just get rid of them?

Ilhan Omar, who is an idiot, made this statement in Minneapolis over the weekend. Listen:

Yeah, that’s a great idea. Get rid of the police and then take everyone’s gun away so they can’t protect themselves. In a nutshell, Omar wants money taken away from the police and given to social programs that are meant to lower crime. Of course, how a social program is going to stop someone from breaking into your house hasn’t been answered but who cares? She doesn’t think it’s criminal to be a criminal either. She’s for no cash bail and prison reform (which means that every criminal should be freed).

This scary call to get rid of cops is be seconded by the worst mayor in the country. Gil Garcetti and Bill De Blasio also want to defund the police.

Here’s the thing: Ilhan Omar is not the leader of anything. She’s a Congressman. She has nothing to do with making decisions that will affect anyone. If the mayor of Minneapolis decides to defund the police and all Hell breaks loose (which is sure to happen), he will get blamed. Not her.

Need proof of that?

The mayor of Minneapolis was confronted with this question. He actually showed up in the middle of a protest and tried to appease these crazy people. And they are crazy people. He was asked, point blank, if he would defund the police. It didn’t work out for him. Listen:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Suz_HC0XG00

I will give some credit to the girly-man, Jacob Frey. He showed up and did not cross that line. Why didn’t he? Because he knows things will screw more than half the population of Minneapolis. He will definitely lose the election then.

The only thing I would suggest to the mayor the next time he confronts a crowd is not to wear skinny jeans with rolled up cuffs and a skin-tight t-shirt. He looked like a little boy and did not command any respect. Looks matter.

On Monday, the Minneapolis city council voted, 9-5, that the police should be defunded. Again, a member in the city council does not have a leadership position. It is still Jacob Frey that is going to be held responsible. He will be blamed if he defunds the police and a home gets broken into and the family assaulted but there is no 9-1-1 to call.

The fight is not over. The council’s vote has a no-veto override. It’s going to be a bumpy ride.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/minneapolis-mayor-jacob-frey-rejects-city-council-push-to-defund-police

 

By the Way, Here is the Real Crime

I’m going to throw something out at you: Black Lives Matters cares about black lives about as much as Antifa cares about being against fascism. Both groups only care about changing our civilization. Nothing more.

This can be shown through the other tragedies throughout the country. Tragedies that are not part of the main stream media

Dave Dorn, a 77-year-old former police captain from Minneapolis, was shot and killed by looters while he was was checking out a pawn shop for a friend.

One person is in custody.

By the way, Dave Dorn is black. No one seems to care.

Last weekend in Chicago, 85 people were shot and 24 died. Of the 85, 74 were black and were shot by other blacks. No one seems to care.

We are still in the middle in the middle of an pandemic. And a virus does not care about race.

For months, public health experts have urged Americans to take every precaution to stop the spread of Covid-19—stay at home, steer clear of friends and extended family, and absolutely avoid large gatherings.

Now some of those experts are broadcasting a new message: It’s time to get out of the house and join the mass protests against racism.

Let me read from Jennifer Nuzzo, a John Hopkins epidemiologist:

“We should always evaluate the risks and benefits of efforts to control the virus. In this moment the public health risks of not protesting to demand an end to systemic racism greatly exceed the harms of the virus.”

Thhis is from Abraar Karan, a Brigham and Woman’s Hospital physician:

“The injustice that’s evident to everyone right now needs to be addressed. While I have voiced concerns that protests risk creating more outbreaks, the status quo wasn’t going to stop #covid19 either.”

In a letter from about 150 physicians addressing the Covid risk with protesting (sic Politico):

Those protests against stay-at-home orders “not only oppose public health interventions, but are also rooted in white nationalism and run contrary to respect for Black lives. Protests against systemic racism, which fosters the disproportionate burden of COVID-19 on Black communities and also perpetuates police violence, must be supported.

“Staying at home, social distancing, and public masking are effective at minimizing the spread of COVID-19. However, as public health advocates, we do not condemn these gatherings as risky for COVID-19 transmission.”

So which is it? Is the Wuhan Flu dangerous or not? Is it dangerous when people protest being stuck at home, unable to work and feed their families and not dangerous while protesting Black Lives Matter and rioting?

You can’t have it both ways. The virus is either dangerous or not. Unless one of these doctors has found that Black Lives Matters and rioting has suddenly cured COVID-19, the virus is going to be dangerous, no matter what.

Or, the virus isn’t dangerous. And the stay-at-home orders were exaggerated to screw with the economy so Trump wouldn’t get elected in November (OK, a little conspiracy theorist).

I think it’s a little bit of both. The three quotes I used are by Left wing organizations and doctors.

And the media keeps spreading this crap and failing, or ignoring, to see the hypocrisy.

Cause they don’t care. It’s only about the movement.

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/06/04/public-health-protests-301534

 

And It’s All Trump’s Fault

According to an NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll released Sunday, just 15% of voters think matters in the USA are under control and perceptions of the economy are at their worst since the end of President Barack Obama’s first term, when the country was still recovering from a recession.

The sense of chaos and economic pessimism did not have much effect on the job approval rating for President Donald Trump. At 45%, his approval rating remains within the range that NBC/Wall Street Journal polls and other surveys have found since he took office.

But that doesn’t mean the media isn’t blaming Trump. And it doesn’t mean Trump poll numbers are shining. As of now, some polls have Trump down to Biden by 14 points. Mind you, this is based on national polls and it is only June. The political climate changes with the flap of a butterfly’s wings. But it is still not good news for Trump.

Mitt Romney has decided to participate in a Black Lives Matter protest. This is a bit of a surprise who was accused of “putting blacks back in chains” if he won the election by Joe Biden. Mitt Romney is the definition of a RINO (Republican in Name Only).

Colin Powell said on CNN:

“We have a Constitution. And we have to follow that Constitution. And the President has drifted away from it.”

He’s talking about Trump threatening to use the Insurrection Act. Yeah, the same ACT that was used by John F. Kennedy (three times), Lyndon B. Johnson (four times) and George H.W. Bush (twice).

This Act allows the President to use the military to quell riots. It was enacted in 1807 and has been upheld by the Supreme Court.

Did Donald Trump implement it? No, he only threatened to use it. So what is Colin Powell’s problem? He’s a Democrat. He was nominated for Secretary of State by George W. Bush, who was also quite liberal and he supported Barrack Obama. He ain’t exactly a Conservative.

George W. Bush decided to chime in too. In a statement, Bush said:

 It remains a shocking failure that many African Americans, especially young African American men, are harassed and threatened in their own country. It is a strength when protesters, protected by responsible law enforcement, march for a better future. This tragedy — in a long series of similar tragedies — raises a long overdue question: How do we end systemic racism in our society? The only way to see ourselves in a true light is to listen to the voices of so many who are hurting and grieving. Those who set out to silence those voices do not understand the meaning of America — or how it becomes a better place.

Many took this to be that Bush doesn’t support Trump. According to a Bush official today, that is not so. But the fact that Bush says that there is systemic racism is telling. Here’s a news flash George: There is no systemic racism and you better hope we don’t have it. Because eight years of your  Presidency are also being accused of systemic racism.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/06/07/poll-eighty-percent-america-out-of-control/3169863001/
https://www.bushcenter.org/about-the-center/newsroom/press-releases/2020/06/statement-by-president-george-w-bush.html
https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/07/politics/colin-powell-donald-trump-protests-cnntv/index.html

 

Final Words

Breath.

This isn’t as bad as it looks.

spacer

Episode 175 Show Notes –

Virtue will forgive.
Proclaim your Guilt, hug your Sin!
Mercy is a Dream.

 

The Virtue Signaling Has Gotten Out of Control

Uber

Uber

Gene,

Let me start by saying I wish I never had to send this email.

I wish that the lives of George Floyd, Ahmaud Arbery, Breonna Taylor, and countless others weren’t so violently cut short. I wish that institutional racism, and the police violence it gives rise to, didn’t cause their deaths. I wish that all members of our Black community felt safe enough to move around their cities without fear. I wish that I didn’t have to try to find the words to explain all of this to my two young sons.

But I’ve been given hope this week by hundreds of thousands of peaceful protestors demanding change. I am committed to being part of that change.

As a company, we believe that everyone has the right to move freely, no matter where they live or the color of their skin. We’re proud of how Uber has helped improve transportation equity over the last decade. But the reality remains that Black Americans often don’t feel safe to move freely in many places around our country. And they still face enormous barriers that others do not.

This is a reality we should not perpetuate or accept. We must do better.

We know there is no easy solution to the problems we have faced for centuries. We also know that we need to devote our time, energy and resources toward making a difference. That’s why we’re making a number of commitments that we will uphold not just this week, but for years to come:

  • We are committed to driving lasting change through criminal justice reform. On Sunday, we announced a $1 million donation to the Equal Justice Initiative and Center for Policing Equity to support their important work in making racial justice in America more than just a promise.
  • We are committed to creating a community that treats everyone equally and with dignity. We do not tolerate discrimination, harrassment or racism on our platform, as outlined in our Community Guidelines. We will hold everyone who uses Uber accountable to these standards of basic respect and human decency. I respectfully ask anyone not willing to abide by these rules to delete Uber.
  • We are committed to supporting the Black community. As a starting point, we will use Uber Eats to promote Black-owned restaurants while making it easier for you to support them, with no delivery fees for the remainder of the year. And in the coming weeks, we will offer discounted rides to Black-owned small businesses, who have been hit hard by COVID-19, to help in their recovery.
  • We are committed to making Uber a diverse and inclusive place for people of color to work and thrive. While we have more work to do, we have tied our senior executives’ pay to measurable progress on our diversity goals, and will continue to publish data on our workforce so the public can hold us accountable. We’re also committed to expanding opportunities for drivers and delivery people, including through education opportunities and skills training.

We know this isn’t enough. It won’t be enough until we see true racial justice. But we plan to work day in and day out to improve, learn, and grow as a company.

Lastly, let me speak clearly and unequivocally: Black Lives Matter.

Dara Khosrowshahi
CEO

 

Local School District

Dear Oceanside Unified Families and Staff,

The OUSD Board of Education stands in solidarity with all students, staff, and community members of color.

Like many of you, we are overcome with anger, sadness, and grief as we grapple with the injustices of inequality and racism in all of its forms. All public institutions, including school districts, are responsible for dismantling the barriers of systemic racism in order for our community and nation to heal these deep wounds. That is why our district’s non-discrimination statement clearly states that we will not permit any “discrimination, harassment, intimidation and bullying in educational programs, activities, or employment on the basis of actual or perceived ancestry, age, color, disability, gender, gender identity, gender expression, nationality, race or ethnicity, immigration status, religious beliefs or customs, sexual orientation, parental, pregnancy, family or marital status, military status or association with a person or a group with one or more of these actual or perceived characteristics.”

We’ve all seen the images of protests and unrest both peaceful and not, across our country in the wake of the terrible killing of yet another Black American. There is very real pain and anguish in our nation that is being felt here in Oceanside as well as in the hearts of your district leaders, teachers, and staff who are dedicated to creating learning environments where all students are safe.

We know that education has the power to make an impact lasting generations. We are proud that with our direction, our district has upheld a commitment to diversity through our culturally proficient educator committee, board policies for Gender Identity & Access and Safe Haven designation, districtwide unconscious bias training, and most recently the approval of our Ethnic Studies course which will arm students with the knowledge and voice to create positive change in their community. But there is still work to be done. Please, partner with us as we work to ensure that all students and staff, including our students and colleagues of color, feel safe and supported by OUSD, where ALL MEANS ALL.

Our students will be seeking understanding and looking for answers during this difficult time. Now is the time for us to lead by example and face the challenge of change together. Our community is one of diversity, compassion, and resilience. No matter your background, your race, your identity, know that you are seen, you are heard, and you are loved. Please do not hesitate to reach out to a principal, counselor, teacher, district administrator, or your board of education if we can answer questions or provide assistance. Additionally you can visit SDCOE’s equity page for resources for your family or classroom.

 

My Running Shoe Store

Fluid image 1
Time to stick together.
Looting our store doesn’t change where we stand
I think the last thing many of you want to read or hear is another platitude regarding social justice and facing ingrained prejudice and racism in our country. In some weird way, the outpouring of support and words can seem placating and insincere when all coupled together in your inbox and FB page. However, it is my hope that you recognize that an important step towards adjudication and remediation is to hear from both citizens and businesses of all sizes, backgrounds, and experiences–and in particular–the experience of a business that took a shot to the chin during the protests.  As some of you may know, our Downtown store was broken into, looted, and damaged on three straight nights. Our experience is by no means isolated, but it has at times become a contentious subject on where concern and focus should be. It is my aim here to make it very clear where Foot Traffic stands: BLACK LIVES MATTER!
No matter what happened to our downtown store and no matter how personal and damaging the looting and destruction is to our store and our community, NOTHING should distract us from what our focus should be on. We need reform. We need change. And we need it now. We can’t wait. Vote. Donate. Get involved. Speak out.
Our store downtown was walloped by some gratuitous opportunist adrenaline junkies that, in my opinion, were NOT representative of what these protests are all about. In fact, they are distracting and antithetical to what 99% of people protesting are looking to do. Nobody should be OK with looting for that reason alone–not just because it sucks that our store was bashed in, but because it may be further entrenching a schism that exists in our country regarding the urgency of this matter.
I personally spent three straight nights cleaning up and guarding our store and watching and learning about how things were transpiring. I was exhausted, scared and frustrated. But I know that those feelings of fear and anger don’t even hold a torch to what POC experience daily. Having something to lose and a platform for outreach makes me absurdly fortunate. I know that. And with that privilege, I want to leave you with this: We can be saddened by our own deeply personal obstacles facing our store, staff, and family…but we are OUTRAGED at what we have witnessed time and time again against people of color day after day. No more.
#BLACKLIVESMATTER
RUN ON surely means so much more than it did to start.
Peace, love, and perseverance,

 

This has gotten stupid.

Legos has removed all advertising for Legos police characters. Really?

This is all virtue signaling. And it’s disgusting. Do these people believe in what they are doing? I don’t know. And I don’t care. They have lost my business because they are perpetuating what I reject.

That’s the awesomeness of capitalism.

\But this stuff is dangerous. It is normalizing hate of our country. It is normalizing hate for people who don’t agree. It is normalizing the elimination of debate.

I do not see these companies as being brave to face…whatever. I see them as cowardly. Afraid to face the mob. Afraid of confronting bad philosophy. It’s easier to submit.

Here’s the problem: These people are justifying violence against those who don’t believe against in the philosophies of Black Lives Matters and Antifa.

A German Lutheran pastor named Martin Niemöller said it best in 1946:

“They came first for the Communists, and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Communist. Then they came for the Jews, and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Jew. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a trade unionist. Then they came for the Catholics, and I didn’t speak up because I was a Protestant. Then they came for me, and by that time no one was left to speak up.”

This is not a conspiracy theory. This is a scary time.

Our Politicians Aren’t Helping

Leftist politicians are also sharing in the belief that these rioters are not actually violent (because shooting at cops and burning buildings is not violent) but are actually justified.

This has led Leftist mayors and governors to pull back the police, even from police stations, leaving them to be burned down by the rioters. Governors and mayors have also rejected the offer for National Guardsmen. They did not want to “set off” the rioters (like they needed anything to do that.

But the worst example of bowing down to criminals is that of Gil Garcetti, the mayor of Los Angeles. The first thing he did was, during a protest outside of his house, he walked out and got on his knees, per the demand, and started chanting his fealty to Black Lives Matter.

But, it gets worse. On Thursday he decided that he was going to cut the police the LAPD budget by between $100-150 million dollars, further following the need to bow down to Black Lives Matter, who wants to defund the police throughout the country.

Because, you know what. that’s what Los Angeles needs. Fewer police. That ought to quell the crime, solve the drug problem and ease them through the homeless crisis.

Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti, City Officials Cutting $100 Million-$150 Million From LAPD Budget, Funds To Be Reinvested In Communities Of Color

 

The Left’s Attack on We Normals

One of the goals of Black Lives Matter is to get white people of today to admit that there is institutional racism, they have white privilege and blacks continue to be victimized today like they were during slavery and Jim Crow.

They also want to shame white people. One way BLM has been doing this is to ask white people to get on their knees and apologize for what has happened in the past and make them promise to teach other “racists” about the evils of their ways. Here’s an example of this:

If you watch the video, these protesters that are capitulating are all white protesters and probably quite liberal. But BLM has gotten others to bend the knee including police, National Guard, Garcetti and Justin Treadau.

This is stupid. And dangerous. And weird.

It is stupid because none of these people had anything to do with slavery or Jim Crow. None of the people they are bending the knee to had anything to do with slavery or Jim Crow. None of these people had anything to do with the death of George Floyd. What are they apologizing for? This is stupid.

It’s dangerous because when a group of people admits to victimizing another group, punishment is justified. That punishment could be through looting, violence of even killing. If that belief sinks into the system, like police, National Guard and politicians start bending the knee, then the punishment named above can become systemic.

Finally this is just weird. It is almost religious in practice. Ben Shapiro and Michael Knowles from the Daily Wire talk about this on their podcast. The Left is atheist in nature. They hate God and religion. Their religion has become environmentalism and racism. This crap of bending the knee and swearing fealty is the Left’s religious ceremony.

But this is not the only example of the Left’s twisted philosophy.

 

spacer

Episode 173 Show Notes – There Is a Bright Spot

The Haiku for the day:

Twitter Ticks off Trump
So long Hong Kong, China’s pawn.
Off to Space we go

I have a feeling I might be writing other types of poetry in the future. This syllable thing is killing me..

 

Protest and Riot Update

The rioting throughout the country has gotten worse:

  • In St. Louis, 4 police officers were shot.
  • In New York City, 1 police officer was run over by and SUV while trying to control rioters.
  • In Buffalo, 2 police officers were run over by an SUV.
  • In Washington DC, 50 Secret Service officers protecting the White House were injured with bricks and Molotov cocktails.
  • A police officer was fired for drawing his gun on a rioter. When the film was analyzed, the rioter had thrown a brick at his supervisor. There’s a lawsuit.
  • New York City mayor, Bill de Blasio, set a curfew of 11:00 PM!
  • Bill de Blasio’s daughter was arrested, Chiara, was arrested for unlawful assembly when a mob attacked police.
  • In New York City, police found Molotov cocktails hidden in bushes. These were laid out by Antifa.
  • President Trump is considering implementing the Insurrection Act. This will allow Trump to call in the military to quell the riots.

 

Trump held a speech on Monday proclaiming that the riots needed to end and law and order needs to be restored. If the mayors and governors don’t do it, he will. This is implementing the Insurrection Act.

Of course, if Trump implements it, he’s a dictator. Reality is the Insurrection Act has been implemented a bunch of times. John F. Kennedy implemented it twice. It was used during the Civil Rights march. It was implemented during the Los Angeles riots of 1992. I’m pretty sure

Trump had a little message for the governors on Monday:

Nothing he said was wrong. But the media only concentrate on the fact that Trump said the governors needed to “dominate”. Whatever. It doesn’t look like being cowardly, which is what the governors are doing,

This country seems to be celebrating the victim-hood of a class of people that have been regular citizens since the 60s. These people stealing Nike’s, alcohol and clothing have never been through slavery or Jim Crow? What happened to make these people so entitled?

Well, I have an idea. Dave and I will talk about it tomorrow. That’s right, Dave from the Dave rule! I’m looking forward to have him on.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2019/national/police-shootings-2019/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/fatal-police-shootings-of-unarmed-people-have-significantly-declined-experts-say/2018/05/03/d5eab374-4349-11e8-8569-26fda6b404c7_story.html

First, the Good News

For the first time in ten years, the United States sent astronauts into space. They lifted off Saturday morning and the launch was perfect.

SpaceX, the company run by Tesla’s Elon Musk, became the first private company to launch men into space. The company partnered with NASA.

They took off in the Dragon Spacecraft power by the Falcon 9 rocket.

Musk, who said he cannot take any credit for the success of the mission but would take all the blame if the mission failed was visibly relieved and emotional when the ship launched.

“I’m really quite overcome with emotion on this day, so it’s kind of hard to talk, frankly. It’s been 18 years working towards this goal, so it’s hard to believe that it’s happened,” Musk said after the launch.

It was a beautiful sight.

Everything looked modern. The ship was streamlined and looked like a spear unlike those bulky rockets of the sixties. The walkway into the ship looked like they were boarding an airplane with carpet and tinted windows. The outfits were sleek and the helmets were smaller and looked more comfortable. The control panel on the dragon was all touchscreen. There weren’t any buttons or switches like in the old command modules and the space shuttles.

Even the take off seemed more modern. instead of a big explosion and smoke filling the air, the rocket let out a quiet hiss and the flame from the engines were sharp and under control. The rocket quickly shot through the air. It was an amazing sight.

Ten minutes later, the falcon rocket separated from the Dragon space ship and landed perfectly on a platform in the middle of the Atlantic.

What I wonder about is why NASA didn’t work with a private company in the first place? There is no heights to the ingenuity of a private company. Their profits and reputation are at stake unlike some government agency. They will build something that works beyond the dreams of the government.

This also shows the power of capitalism. Companies are motivated to be successful and create an awesome product. Socialism is missing that. That’s why the Russians are still using the Soyuz rocket system that has been around since 1966 (it’s set to retire this year). Why would anyone build anything. They get nothing out of it.

 

https://www.space.com/elon-musk-emotional-spacex-astronaut-launch.html

 

Just Regulation or a Strike to Free Speech?

Twitter did something they have never done before. They fact-checked President Trump.

The fact-check involved one of Trumps claims about mail-in ballots. Trump sited the problems that California has with mail-in ballots and ballot harvesting (something we discussed last week).

There were a couple of problems with Twitter’s “fact-check”:

  1. They have never fact-checked anyone before. Not the Chinese government, the radical Islamists or any far Left character like Louis Farrakhan.
  2. Their fact check was just wrong. We need studies to find ballot fraud from ballot harvesting or mail-in ballots. People were actually arrested in California for it. California had a vote of 112% of the population.

 

President Trump had enough. He decided to go after the social media sites and their censorship. Here’s how:

Essentially, what he is doing is letting people sue Twitter.

He’s using the Decency Act, which is kind of a stretch. The Decency Act prevents profane or libelous speech. Newspapers and news outlets are held to this act. Social media avoid this because they are not considered a news outlet and can’t possibly be held responsible for what people say.

Problem is, these platforms are censoring stuff. I have been:

  • Suspended from Twitter three times.
  • My podcasts and vlogs on YouTube are impossible to find.
  • I have had videos suspended on YouTube.

 

I think this is a good thing. Democrats do to, sort of. Well, they want Trump fact checked. But, now, everyone is going to be fact-checked, including those Democrats or risk a lawsuit.

 

https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/28/politics/trump-twitter-social-media-executive-order/index.html
https://thehill.com/policy/technology/500212-gop-deeply-divided-over-trumps-social-media-crackdown

 

 

The Hammer Drops on Hong Kong and China

On Wednesday, The United States opened the door to dropping the hammer on China and the Chinese-sympathetic Honk Kong government:

“Beijing’s disastrous decision is only the latest in a series of actions that fundamentally undermine Hong Kong’s autonomy and freedoms and China’s own promises to the Hong Kong people under the Sino-British Joint Declaration, a U.N.-filed international treaty.

“The State Department is required to assess the territory’s autonomy from China, and…on Wednesday Pompeo certified to Congress that Hong Kong ‘does not continue to warrant treatment under United States laws in the same manner as U.S. laws were applied to Hong Kong before July 1997.

“No reasonable person can assert today that Hong Kong maintains a high degree of autonomy from China, given facts on the ground. Hong Kong is no longer autonomous from China, given facts on the ground.”

The next day, and it wasn’t a secret, Trump made an announcement about China and Hong Kong.

It’s about time.

Students come to this country, earn advanced degrees then take the advanced technology back to China. This is a de facto way of stealing our technology. Let China teach their future professionals technology.

Putting the clamp on Chinese companies within the United States also makes sense. These companies are stealing technology and taking our money for Beijing. They don’t belong here. They do not have good intention and are still under the socialist thumb of China.

As much as I feel for the protesting Hong Kongers who do not want their city state under despot control, the sad truth is they are. Their government is extremely sympathetic to China. And the sprawling Hong Kong economy is a way for China to bypass the sanctions and tariffs placed on China by the United States.

This was bound to happen and needed to happen, especially since China has been put the clamps down on Hong Kong.

The question is going to be what will happen as the United States and other countries begin to pull themselves away from China?

 

 

https://www.dailywire.com/news/us-declares-hong-kong-no-longer-autonomous-accuses-china-of-violating-treaty-with-uk
https://www.dailywire.com/news/trump-to-expel-thousands-of-chinese-grad-students-in-u-s-who-have-ties-to-chinese-military-schools

 

 

 

Who’s Side Are These Guys On Anyway?

 

 

https://www.dailywire.com/news/f-trump-and-keep-going-teigen-carell-other-celebs-posting-bail-for-rioters
https://www.dailywire.com/news/joe-biden-campaign-staffers-donate-to-group-that-pays-bail-in-riot-torn-minneapolis-report-says
https://www.dailywire.com/news/de-blasio-blames-trump-for-riots-saying-president-helped-to-poison-the-atmosphere

 

 

spacer