Things are coming to a head in Washington. Articles of impeachment have been submitted by Jerry Nadler. The IG report by Michael Horowitz was also released on Monday and the media is trying to spin it.And the Democrats, trying to save face from this impeachment farce. has given Trump a big win. But did we win?

At Least These Articles Are More Entertaining Than Anything the NY Times Has

Here we go:

Notice that something is missing here? Where’s the bribery? Where’s the extortion? Abuse of power? Really?

Let’s look at these two articles because I know you guys aren’t dumb enough to read them. So let me explain.

The first article, abuse of power, shows that the Democrats are hosed. Abusing power is what leads one to commit crimes. In itself, abuse of power is not a crime.

If I am your boss and I sexually harass you, I am abusing my power leading me to do a criminal act. The criminal act is the sexual harassment.

In the impeachment case, they can say that Trump abused power by committing the crime or crimes of bribery and/or extortion. Bribery and extortion have legal structure and definition. Abuse of power has no structure or definition. It’s a concept. Intent, which is important here, is impossible to prove or deny. It’s a perception. It’s an opinion.

What do I mean by that. I’ll give you two examples: one really simple and one that hits closer to this. I walk up to you and exclaim I’m tall. You, who stand about a foot taller than me, and that probably true, say I am not. That I’m short. I tell you, no, I’m tall, you’re just taller.

Let me give something a little closer to this scenario. My boss tells me something. I don’t like him. He’s always telling me what to do. I point at him and scream, “Abuse of power!” What crime did he commit? Who knows? That wasn’t part of the dialog. I didn’t say.

Walk up to your boss and, when he says something, accuse him of abusing power. I guarantee he will ask what he did. Because abuse is power is not a crime and they can’t prove extortion or bribery.

Believe it or not, the second article of impeachment, obstruction of Congress, is even thinner. Congress can subpoena anyone want. But that doesn’t mean they have to go. I can ignore a subpoena. But, if Congress really want to see me, they will have to take me to court. Maybe they are calling me because they don’t like me and want to embarrass me.

That’s why they are three branches of government. Separation of powers. If the Congress does go to court, they order I have to testify and I still say, “no” then I’m obstructing justice. Obstruction of Congress in this case? No, not a thing.

I am going to hold my position: I think impeachment, to my chagrin, is not going to happen. I think Pelosi knows it.

Purple and Red state Democrats are kind of stand-offish and there is a request for censure on the floor of the House. To late for that. Some Republicans might have gone for that before but, seeing the case, not anymore.

I don’t think impeachment is a slam dunk and I’m going against a lot of smarter guys than me.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/breaking-democrats-filing-two-articles-of-impeachment-against-trump-for-separate-issues-report-says
https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/10/politics/articles-impeachment-trump/index.html

The IG Report

The media is thrilled with the release of the IG Report written and investigated bi Michael Horowitz. Listen to Chris Cuomo fawn over the report:

Well, here’s the problem for CNN, MSNBC, the New York Time, the Washington Post and all the other Democratic media outlets: The report does not get the FBI off the hook.

Though the report said there was no evidence of political bias, the investigation did not really analyze motive or go deep into the possibility of bias. Basically, Horowitz asked if they had any animus against Trump and if they said no, good enough. This was more of a report on process than intent.

The report says there were grave mistakes during the FISA process to get a warrant on Carter Page. Seventeen to be exact. They include:

• The omission that Carter Page served and a governmental agent from 2008 to 2016. He worked for them.
• The overstatement of the significance of the Steele Dossier.
• That the Steele Dossier was corroborated.
• Said that Steele did not give the dossier to the press when, in fact, he gave it to Yahoo News.
• Never mentioned that  Papadopoulos denied that the Trump campaigned was working with the Russians.
• Omitted Page’s contention that he never met Manafort. This is important because he was accused of working with Manafort to contact the Russians.

This is just to name a few. I don’t know about you, but this seems pretty damning. Either these guys were after Trump or they are the most incompetent agency if the U.S government.

I prefer the former. My reasoning: all these “errors” always went against Trump. Weird, huh?

William Barr had a couple of things to say about this, especially the rather thin explanation of no partisanship in the investigation.

John Durham added:

“I have the utmost respect for the mission of the Office of Inspector General and the comprehensive work that went into the report prepared by Mr. Horowitz and his staff. However, our investigation is not limited to developing information from within component parts of the Justice Department. Our investigation has included developing information from other persons and entities, both in the U.S. and outside of the U.S.  Based on the evidence collected to date, and while our investigation is ongoing, last month we advised the Inspector General that we do not agree with some of the report’s conclusions as to predication and how the FBI case was opened.”

Don’t forget: Durham is on a criminal investigation, not a process investigation. This ain’t over yet.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/limbaugh-ig-report-far-more-damaging-than-media-admits-confirms-everything-about-the-coup
https://www.dailywire.com/news/ig-report-here-are-the-17-specific-inaccuracies-and-omissions-in-the-fbis-fisa-warrants-against-carter-page

The impeachment circus continues. I had about fifty other stories but things have blown up this week. And some of it was really funny. So let’s talk about the public hearing held by the House Judiciary Committee and what will happen next.

Impeachment Crap

The House Judiciary Committee decided to have their public hearings for impeachment. This is after Adam “I-don’t-give-a” Schiff decided to release his report recommending impeachment.

Now, I am bored by this and I didn’t watch most of it. Basically, the inquiry was made up of four college law professors telling us why Trump is a jerk. The problem is: Trump is a jerk and I’m good with it.

Seriously, there was nothing factual about this. The three anti-Trump witnesses chosen by the Democrats said we need to impeach right away because Trump is a jerk. The one ant-Trump witness chosen by the Republicans said, “Whoa, slow down”and could not support impeachment because there was no evidence for this (more on that later).

Of course, the Democrats interviewed the first three witnesses who were chosen by the Democrats. And the Republicans interviewed the last witness who was chosen by the Republicans. It was really boring and didn’t really enlighten anyone.

The one that stood out was Stanford law professor Pamela Karlen. Right off the bat, one could tell she didn’t like Trump. And that became especially clear when she went after Trump through his son Barron.

Melania Trump Tweeted her displeasure but it was Matt Gaetz who blew up Karlen. Not only he expose her bias (which was never really well hidden he told her she was a mean spirit. It’s a little long but worth it. Watch:

Eventually, Karlen apologized, sort of.

But it was Jonathan Turley, a liberal democrat and the witness for the Republicans that really hit it on the head. Turley is a law professor at George Washington University. He said this impeachment inquiry with no evidence of a crime is a dangerous path for the Democrats to go on.

He is exactly right. He even pointed out earlier that it was the Democrats that were abusing their power, not Trump.

All in all, this accomplished absolutely nothing. Just three people who hated Trump and one guy that didn’t see any reason to go after him. None of them brought anymore evidence.

And it was really boring.

This Guy Needs to Go Away

But it was Al Green that was able to define why the hearings didn’t go well and he was upset about it.

This guy is such a moron. He’s the same Al Green that said the Democrats had to impeach Trump or he was going to win another four years. This is the same Al Green

Geronimo!

Nancy Pelosi had a meeting with her caucus on Wednesday. In that meeting, she asked, “Are you ready?” After the meeting, she did not answer any questions about what transpired. She did receive Adam Schiff’s 300-page report about his opinions about the impeachment inquiry.

It took less than 24 hours to get her reaction. Watch:

Nancy just jumped the shark. I really though she was a smarter politician than this but I underestimated the hate she had for Trump.

One thing I never see as these press conferences with her is any push back. Well, she got it this time from a reporter who asked her if she was doing this because she hated Trump. She went into a complete tizzy.

Hands and dentures were flying around. Four reporters suffered minor injuries when they were pelted by cracked dentures, dried Poligrip and fake finger nails.

Whatever. This trips me out about Nancy Pelosi. Every time someone says anything critical of her views of the President, she brings up that she’s a Catholic and she prays for him every night. That’s a crock. She doesn’t pray for him any more than he prays for her.

And then calling him a coward because he won’t support climate change, DACA and gun control is not the best way to show her unconditional, platonic love she has for him.

By the way, she is Speaker of the House of Representatives. Do you know what the House of Representatives does? They make law! Make laws. But they can’t because they’re too busy working on this stupid impeachment thing.

Finally, the Catholic thing is the most annoying. She supports gay marriage. She supports the re-defining of gender. She supports abortion to the moment of birth. She ain’t much of a Catholic. Heck, I’m not sure she would get Communion if she ever went to church unless she spent about four months in a confessional.

Final Thoughts

There are three articles that seem to be in play based on some of the graphics shown on Wednesday:

1. Abuse of power and bribery.
2. Obstruction of justice.
3. Obstruction of Congress.

There are some real problems here.

1. There’s no proof of any crime. They had no witnesses.
2. These are intent crimes. One also has to prove intent. That’s difficult.
3. There’s no obstruction of justice or Congress because people ignored subpoenas.

There are several things to look for which are going to make 2020 a very interesting year:

1. What’s going to the Democratic Presidential Candidates? Warren, Sanders, Klobachar and Booker are Senators.
2. Who are the Republicans going to call to the stand?
3. What is going to happen after this sham is over? Will these people get to work (finally) or will they just bitch for the six months before the elections?
4. Will the Democrats keep up the investigations?
5. What is going to happen to the Democrats during the 2020 elections?

Here’s what I think is going to happen:

1. The Republicans are not going to rush this.
2. We are going to hear about real corruption.
3. Trump will not be removed from office.
4. Biden gets smeared in the impeachment trial and falls flat (Hilary?).
5. Either Hilary Clinton or Elizabeth Warren captures the nomination. If Clinton enters the race, it will be late and it will be a contested convention (that will be fun).
6. Trump wins the 2020 election.
7. Republicans take the House.
8. Republicans take the Senate.

It’s going to be bad for the Democrats. And we haven’t even seen the IG report yet.

Impeachment Inquiry

Garbage. Schiff is going to move on to impeach Trump.

The lead witness Gordon Sondland, who actually spoke to Trump, admitted that all his testimony was from his perception. That’s right, his opinion.

In fact, no witness had any direct knowledge of what is a quid pro quo. But we do know some things:

• The witnesses did not like Trump’s foreign policy with Ukraine (not impeachable).
• Some of the witnesses do not like the way Trump let Amb. Yovanovich go (too bad, not impeachable).
• The evidence is second hand, all the way to sixth hand (hearsay is evidence but usually only supporting).
• No one really knew if or why Trump held the aid to Ukraine (Investigate Biden, Ukrainian corruption, Trump didn’t trust Solinsky, Trump doesn’t like giving out foreign aid?).
• Trump doesn’t like giving out foreign aid.
• Sondland was told, directly by Trump, “I want nothing. I want them to do the right thing.”
• That all of these witnesses were career bureaucrats that were never elected and thought they knew more than Trump.
• None had ever said anything about bribery, which Schiff named in his new narrative, in their prior testimony.
• None could name a crime Trump committed. Apparently they are all smarter than Trump on implementing crappy policies but aren’t smart enough to know any simple law.
• Trump did far more for Ukraine than Obama did.

This whole thing is crap.Not one Republican mind will be changed.

Schiff is now working on a summary document which are the articles of impeachment recommendation. And Democrats are still riding the wave of impeachment, though…

And this is where I come in. There was no evidence. Here are a few questions:

• What s the difference between a quid pro quo and negotiation? Democrats don’t know. That’s why they’re throwing out bribery?
• Was Trump investigating 2016 corruption, whether Trump didn’t trust Solinsky, whether Trump didn’t want to give aid, or wanted the son of a political rival investigated? Intent matters here.
• If this was bribery, what did we get out of it?
• Where’s the intent?
• Why are these career bureaucrats more trustworthy than a duly elected President?
• Where’s the proof?

The fact is: none of these questions are going to be answered. Because this is the Deep State, a term I hated, versus and outsider. The Deep State doesn’t see it. They see themselves as the government, meant to uphold the status quo, no matter the results. As long as the Deep State isn’t questioned and is able to keep power.

Amb. Yovanovich has been in public service, an un-elected position, for 33 years. She did not like Trump, the outsider. She said so much many times while in Ukraine. She did not stop the corruption in Ukraine and the Republicans showed that during her testimony.

President Trumps biggest mistake was that he did not raze the establishment. Fire everyone. Put his own people in. I wonder if that level of compassion will be acknowledged by the Democrats.

Obama fired everyone.

The Democratic Debate

Right after the Impeachment Inquiry was complete, the fourth Democratic debate took place. What a crap show. It was so boring. I watched about 45 minutes before I realized I had other things to do. There are certain themes that were taken from this debate because of the Trump impeachment inquiry:

• Koom Bye Ya – Yeah, I didn’t spell it correctly but you get it. The Democrats need to show unity. Tearing each other apart is counter-productive. But it made it very boring.
• Some of the candidates are beginning to realize they need to be more moderate (Biden, Butt-gig, Booker) if they have a chance to win the general election.

But the candidates are beginning to separate themselves. Let’s look at each of them and how they are going to run. I’m going to base this on the relevant candidates and forget the others.:

• Biden- Will get the nomination. Moderate, comfortable and old. Still gaffing left and right. But the Democrat base will vote for him. He just needs to get through the primaries which are being run by the Left.
• Butt-gig- Intelligent, well-spoken and naive. He’s pretending to be a victim and seem disingenuous. But he avoided attack.
• Warren- Done. She’s a liar and it shows with her “policies.” She has too much hate for successful people as can be seen with her “billionaire tears” mug she’s selling. Hate is never a good thing to run on. Not to mention the tax thing.
• Bernie- Communist. No.
• Booker- Better performance because he tried to make himself look more moderate. He looks Presidential. but he seems to try too hard.
• Harris- Her laugh is creepy and her positions jump all over the place. No
• Klobuchar-She’s the best candidate. She did really well. But she’s mean and that has already turned people off. She also has that weird voice. And what’s with the eating salad with a comb thing?
• Yang- I like Yang and his ideas are truly progressive. His ideas are something we need to think about in the future as technology advances. I think he’s a better 2028 candidate.
• Gabbard- A true moderate which is why she gets two questions per debate. She would beat Trump but she’s done.
• Anyone not mentioned- Done.

This debate was a crap show. The MSNBC moderators really sucked and were highly partisan. This was truly a love fest. The Democrats are going to have some problems.

OMG!

The FISA court report is being release. In it is being named an FBI lawyer that is named as being one who manipulated the warrants.

On December 11, We’re going to learn some things. And this impeachment thing is going to die.

More to come!

The Heat is Rising in Iran

I have always said that the Iranian citizen are for more progressive than their fundamentalist government. And it looks like those progressives are getting annoyed.

The Trump sanctions, limits on freedom and three proxy wars are beginning to weigh heavily on Iran and their citizens.But, worse, the Mullahs, who are in charge, shut down the Internet

No Instagram? Oh, crap.

The protests are throughout the country and Amnesty International has reported that about 200 people through 21 cities have been killed by the Revolutionary Guard.

The government has said that all the protests have been quelled and that there have been security forces killed also. But videos posted on social media show that the protests are continuing and are extremely including citizens being shot by snipers. There’s the reason why social media has been cut off.

The reason prices are going up is because the government is running out of money and the wealth gap is getting wider. In order to keep social programs running. Working citizens are doing more and getting less but have to pay more. And they’re pissed off.

Of course the media is not reporting this. The also are not reporting the centrifuges they are spinning in preparation for creating a nuclear weapon. That’s because it will go against St. Obama’s narrative.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/iran-unrest-protest-deaths_n_5dd454dae4b010f3f1ceb58b

Hong Kong, Like the United States, is Going Red

Just like Iran, there is chaos in China. And, no, the media is not reporting it.

Over the past couple of weeks, pro-Hong Kong protesters and Chinese sympathizers have been clashing. A couple of protesters were shot while scuffling with security forces. A pro-government sympathizer was set on fire by protesters.

Now, about 100 protesters took over the Hong Kong Polytechnic College and kept it under siege with crude weapons and lighting fires. Police, advised by the Chinese government, surrounded the building and the siege lasted for three days. That is when 1000 protesters approached the college a fought with the police and tried to help those in the college escape.

The Hong Kong government arrested over a 1000 protesters including 300 minors. Unsurprisingly, no injuries or deaths were reported by the pro-Chinese Hong Kong government.

The protests started because China, who was given the city-state by England in the 90s and has promised to let the city be independent until 2047, has changed the laws making it that criminals, mostly political prisoners, are tried in mainland China. Many of those political prisoners have just disappeared and never heard from again.

Gotta love communism.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/hong-kong-university-under-siege-by-police-protesters-fear-violent-chinese-crackdown

The third witness appears in the public impeachment inquiry and President Trump does not help himself. How innocent is the death row inmate in Texas all these celebrities are trying to save. Hint: not very. Huge ruling from a judge that gives Trump another big win. And Colin is getting a second chance. Good for him.

Ugh!

The second day of the public impeachment inquiry took place yesterday.  The former ambassador for Ukraine,  Marie Yovanovitch went in front of the House Intelligence Committee. This interview pretty much sums up her testimony:

That’s pretty much all the Republicans did. This woman was fired from her job in the Trumpian way and she was bitter. That bitterness came out in her opening. She felt mistreated and said that Rudy Guiliani had started spreading rumors about her and that was why she thought she was fired. It was very emotional. In fact, the Democratic counsel asked her how she felt over ten times.

Then she complained about the U.S. policy with Ukraine. She believed we are not doing enough.

That’s all the Democrats had with this gal. Nothing. Republicans just pointed out that Yovanovitch was fired before the phone call with Ukranian President Zelensky, she never talked to Zelensky and that President Trump can fire her for no reason at all. Chris Stewart (UT-R) pointed this out:

Stewart: “I would now feel compelled to ask you, Madam Ambassador, as you sit here before us, very simply and directly, do you have any information regarding the president of the United States accepting any bribes?”

Yovanovitch: “No.”

Stewart: “Do you have any information regarding any criminal activity that the president of the United States has been involved with at all?”

Yovanovitch: “No.”

Here’s the problem: Trump doesn’t help himself. During the testimony, he got the brilliant idea to Tweet:

Mr. President, with all due respect, shut the f- up! 

All he has to do is stop talking. The Dems look bad and this “witness” looks bad. They will use and manipulate anything he says. Adam “I-don’t-give-a” Schiff used that Tweet to probably add another article of impeachment.

Crap! He wasn’t threatening her. She’s not intimidated. But the point is not to put himself in that position.Ukraine, Somalia; none of that is her fault. Those countries were already screwed up. The Democrats are crazy on their own. Trump needs to stop out-crazing them.

There was a fourth witness. I did not watch his testimony. I have a life. This is from a Fox News article.

David Holmes, the political counsel at the U.S. Embassy in Ukraine, said that he heard Gordon Sondland, ambassador to the European Union, talk to Trump on the phone about investigations. That’s it. Why Sondland would talk to the President of the United States on an unsecured line in a foreign? Sounds like BS.

Supposedly, Sondland told the President that Zelensky “loves his ass” and the investigations were assured.

This is so stupid. First off, this isn’t even believable. Next, even if Sondland testifies, he can use Presidential Privledge and not answer any questions. Finally, what investigation? Into corruption or Biden (which, by the way, is the same thing)? Holmes doesn’t answer any of that.

We’ve had four witnesses. None of them know anything. All don’t like Trump or his policies with Ukraine even though his policies are stronger than the ones under Obama.

When did the Ukraine become such a vital resource for American national security? They were under Soviet rule for, what, 50 years and we did fine. In fact, we toppled the Soviets. Ukraine didn’t help.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/embassy-official-david-holmes-trump-sondland-call
https://www.foxnews.com/media/marie-yovanovitch-president-trump-impeachment-hearing

Good Riddance

Finally, the courts made the right decision.

The daughter of a Yemeni diplomat, Hoda Muthana, decided to join ISIS. What a shock, right? Well, she was born in New Jersey while the diplomat was working here.

While in Syria, she participated in terrorist activities and tried to encourage terrorist activities in the United States by stating, “Go on drive-bys and spill all of their blood.” Sounds like a sweetheart, huh?

She also was married to three different ISIS fighters and has some kids. All three of her husbands were killed.

Apparently, Syria is not the vacation spot would be and she wanted to come back to the United States. She said she regretted everything she did. Wah.

The Trump administration pretty much said f-you. Mike Pompeo said:

“Ms. Hoda Muthana is not a U.S. citizen and will not be admitted into the United States. She does not have any legal basis, no valid U.S. passport, no right to a passport, nor any visa to travel to the United States. We continue to strongly advise all U.S. citizens not to travel to Syria.”

Soon after, President Trump Tweeted:

“I have instructed Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, and he fully agrees, not to allow Hoda Muthana back into the Country!”

Here the thing, if one is born from a diplomat who is immune to the United States laws, that child is not a citizen. That is literal. There is precedence.

A Judge Reggie Walton made a ruling today that really screwed Muthana. He ruled:

“…there was sufficient evidence that Muthana had been born while her father, who once represented Yemen in the United Nations, still had diplomatic status in the US. Federal regulations and international law state that children of foreign diplomats born in the US are not subject to the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, which guarantees birthright citizenship, because they are born under the jurisdiction of another country.”

I am happy. I hope Hoda likes sand and goats.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/u-s-born-isis-brides-attempt-to-get-back-into-country-crushed-by-judge

Dude Can’t Throw

The public impeachment hearings started today and I, like a good host, watched most of them. Thank God I was at work or I would have wasted a lot of time.

To Impeach or Not to Impeach

The public hearing for the impeachment inquiry started today. What a hot mess. Two people were interviewed today:  ambassador to Ukraine Bill Taylor and George Kent, a Ukraine expert and analyst. I wish they had started playing this at 8 PM instead of 10 AM. I could have used the sleep.

It was terrible and I can’t believe these two bozos were actually Adam Schiff’s star witnesses. I was going to throw some clips out about what these guys said but their opening statements were so long. Each were about 40 minutes long and I didn’t have the stomach to listen to it again to get the clips. Essentially, these guys did not hear the call, saw the transcript and didn’t like the foreign policy when it came to Ukraine.

So I sat and listened to the Democrats interview these guys. The time was broken up into opening statements, forty-five minutes for the Democrats, forty-five minutes for the Republicans and, finally, five minutes for each Congressman. Trust me, this took forever.

The Democrats went first and things seemed to look good for these witnesses. In fact, things were going so good, Lou Dobbs of Fox News said this is real bad news for Trump if the Republicans couldn’t crack these too. I love Lou, but he was wrong. Not liking the President’s policies is not an impeachable offense and that’s what these guys were pushing.

Republicans tore them up. A watcher could tell the two were uncomfortable. Taylor was stuttering along and, for some reason, his hearing was going bad. Kent maybe said four words during the Republican questions. But we did find out some important facts:

• They never talked to the President. Heck, one of them never even met him.
• Neither were in the room during the call. Their information came from other people or the transcript.
• Ambassador Taylor met with the Ukrainian President three times and the quid pro quo was never mentioned by the Ukrainian President.
• The President of Ukraine did not know for a month that the $400 million was being withheld and had not intention of starting an investigation.
• Taylor could not answer, definitively, if the Investigation Trump wanted was for investigating Biden or just investigating corruption in general.
• Finally, one of the reasons this Taylor thought made it clear what Trump wanted came from another ambassador named Sondeland. Guess what, Sondeland not only contradicted Taylor, he did it in writing and gave it to the Republicans.
• Finally, the Trump administration did more than the Obama administration in helping Ukraine. Obama only gave Ukraine blankets and MREs (Meals Ready to Eat) while Trump gave them weapons to fight the Russians.

They were a mess. And these two were supposed to be the Democrats star witnesses. They are interviewing an ambassador tomorrow who was fired by Trump. Yeah, she doesn’t have an ax to grind. This is big trouble for the Democrats. They have had two months of underground testimony. Testimony that is highly hidden, strictly controlled by Adam Schiff who picks all of the witnesses and has denied all of the requests for witnesses by the Republicans. This whole thing looked like a sham. Not that it’s in public, it looks like a sham run by an incompetent.

If things continue like this, should the Democrats move on to a vote and allow a trial to go on in the Senate? That might be the million dollar question. Let’s take a look at that.

Once in the Senate, It’s a Whole New Ball Game

David Marcus from The Federalist released an article called 5 Reasons A Senate Trial Would Be A Nightmare For Democrats. This article really made clear that voting for impeachment, along party lines, could be a disaster when it gets to the Senate.

The first issue is the Democrats lose control of the process. Right now, the Democrats have control. They can call witness, reject Republican witnesses, control what questions are asked and control the forum. It won’t be like that in the Senate. This leads us to number 2.

Remember the confidentiality of the whistleblower Adam Schiff is so worried about? Gone. Senate will call him. They will also call Hunter Biden, Joe Biden, Adam Schiff, Jim Comey, Andrew McCabe, Peter Strock, Lisa Paige and anyone else that had anything to do with Russia and Ukraine. That might include Hilary Clinton and Barrack Obama.

I’ve got a little surprise for you at the conclusion. Not good for Democrats.

The third reason is that you have a few Senators who are on the campaign trail. That includes Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, Kamala Harris, Cory Booker and Amy Klobuchar. If this get approved by Christmas, the trial could be held in the middle of the Iowa primary. Oops.

Fourth reason, if this gets to the Senate and the Senate starts searching for the facts that will get to the truth, it is going to look like the House was being political and not legal or moral. This will unify the Republican, get Trump re-elected and probably raise the numbers in the Senate.

Finally, the chance of Trump being removed from office with what has been presented so far is null. It will be a loss for the Democrats. And the Republicans will point out the House did nothing for four months but waste time and money. No work on DACA, no work on health care and no work on infrastructure. Again, it might waste the Democrats in the House come the 2020 election.

https://thefederalist.com/2019/11/11/5-reasons-a-senate-trial-would-be-a-nightmare-for-democrats/

Conclusion

Democrats have some real problems. Not only is their impeachment inquiry not going well. Not only if impeachment gets through the House, it could be a disaster for Democrats in the Senate. Not only can it kill the Democrats for the elections in 2020.

But there are rumors that a report about the Trump spying thing might be released next week. I am not sure which report it is but it is sure to mess up the web the Democrats have spun. They need to rush it to declassify so I doubt it will be next week but that will be bad for Democrats. Happy Thanksgiving!

Democrats look like they are panicking right now and that includes Nancy Pelosi. Their Presidential candidate suck and have no chance at beating Trump in 2020. Hell, Hilary Clinton is thinking of jumping back into the 2020 race. And why wouldn’t she? Look at what she’d be running against.

I think the only person who can beat Trump is Trump himself. He needs to be less crazy than the Democrats. That shouldn’t be hard but he seems to be competing with him pretty hard.

This is what he needs to do:

Tweet positive. Call this a witch hunt because it is. But drop it. Today, the Dow Jones went up another 100 points. It’s up 10,000 points since he took over. Push the positive.

Push the negative of the policies of the Democratic candidates. Make them look crazier. It should be pretty easy.

Stop cussing. It’s a turn off.

He needs to think before he talks. That call was not perfect. The reason: he said Biden. If he had said Burisma, the would have been no problem. He’s not a politician, which is why people love him. But he does need to think about what he says before he talks and that’s what started this whole mess.

Finally, fire no one.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/democrats-shift-trump-impeachment-focus-to-new-potential-offenses