Oregon has chosen who their real citizens are and it ain’t the tax payers.
I have a story about something that is horrific and probably happening more than we think.
Who Really Has the Right in this Place?
This rights to the homeless thing is getting out of control in blue states. They now have more rights than people who are actually productive members of society.
According to The Blaze:
An Oregon bill called the “Right to Rest Act” would decriminalize camping in public places and give homeless people the ability to treat property — like tents — as private residences even when they’re on public sidewalks, KATU-TV reported.
HB3501 asserts that homeless people would be entitled to “a privacy interest and a reasonable expectation of privacy in any property belonging to the person, regardless of whether the property is located in a public space,” KATU said, adding that means they can treat public spaces like private residences “without discrimination and time limitations that are based on housing status.”
The station added that homeless people also can sue for up to $1,000 if they are “swept, told to relocate, or otherwise ‘harassed’ as per the bill.”
Jimmy Jones — executive director of the Mid-Willamette Valley Community Action Agency — told KATU that “most of the advocate community in the state really want to establish a constitutional right to exist, and I am very sympathetic with that position because I don’t believe that when people lose their housing they lose their legal and constitutional rights.”
Question for you, are any of these homeless people paying property taxes? Property taxes are about 1%. Shouldn’t the homeless have to pay property taxes on land they “own”?
Finally, no one has a Constitutional right to be homeless. And one does not have the right to infringe on the Constitutional right of others. Parking a tent in front of someone’s home or business is infringing on someone else Constitutional right. Infringing on someone’s quality of life is infringing on someone’s Constitutional right to the pursuit of happiness.
https://www.theblaze.com/news/ooregon-right-to-rest-act-would-let-homeless-treat-tents-on-public-sidewalks-as-private-residences-and-sue-for-1000-if-harassed?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
Just Disturbing
This is such a graphic and disturbing story, I am going to read the whole thing to you. If all parents- no, all people- heard this, they would no longer be hot an bothered by this trans-ing the kids thing or trans-ing anyone for that matter.
According to the Post Millennial:
A 2016 medical article documenting the tragic death of one of the participants in the linchpin Dutch study upon which the entire child sex change experiment is based indicates that puberty suppression was to blame for the young person’s death.
The reason this is an important story is because this is happening far more than we are being told. There’s a reason why these procedures aren’t allowed to be done on children in Europe.
The case is that of an 18-year-old trans-identified male whose puberty was blocked by the Dutch researchers at a very early stage, meaning there wasn’t enough penile tissue for surgeons to use to create a “neo-vagina.” Therefore, a more risky procedure using a section of the patient’s bowel was necessary, which resulted in fatal necrotizing fasciitis.
Right off the bat, we see an issue with puberty blockers
The manuscript, by Negenborn et al., begins by saying that the “absence of a functional vagina has a negative effect on the (sexual) quality of life of (transgender) women” and explains that multiple surgical procedures have been described for vaginal “reconstruction” in these patients.
The patient is described as being a “healthy” 18-year-old for whom standard vaginoplasty surgery was “not feasible” due to having undeveloped genitals as a result of early puberty suppression.
“Transgender women with early-onset gender dysphoria, treated with puberty suppressing hormones, report fewer behavioral and emotional problems and an improvement of general functioning,” readers are assured at this point.
Here’s the problem with this statement, there are no studies that validate this. Every study I have seen has been very flawed because there is not enough data to make any statement like this. We just started doing this. Todays children are the test subjects.
Major complications began within 24 hours of surgery, and necrotising fasciitis was confirmed in the days that followed. Despite large doses of intravenous antibiotics and “repeated surgical debridement,” the previously healthy patient went into multiple organ failure and died.
Once again, after this harrowing account of a young person’s needless death, the researchers assure the reader that “vaginal reconstruction” has a “positive influence” on the quality of life of “non-transgender and transgender women,” but cautions that “physicians and patients need to be aware of serious complications that may arise.”
Well, it didn’t in this case and I’m sure in many others.
The investigation into the young person’s death revealed that the deadly strain of E-Coli most likely came from the patient’s own intestines, not from the hospital setting, meaning that the more risky vaginoplasty surgery necessary due to early puberty suppression almost certainly caused the fatality.
Dr. Michael Biggs, a sociologist who played a key role in exposing the scandal that unfolded at the soon-to-be-closed Tavistock gender clinic in London, spoke of this tragic case in a recent interview on the Wider Lens podcast.
He’s a sociologist. He’s not a real doctor.
Biggs noted that while early puberty suppression for boys who experience childhood-onset gender dysphoria has the advantage of creating a more feminine appearance in adulthood, the major disadvantage is the penis remains that of small boy making vaginoplasty much riskier.
“Instead of using the penile tissue, they will have to use some of your colon,” explained Biggs. “Now of course, that means opening up your intestines, and that’s obviously much much much riskier because then you have a different site and of course, intestines are also messy.”
Biggs went on to say that the Dutch team do not acknowledge that the young person’s death was not due to a random hospital infection but rather was an indirect consequence of puberty suppression.
Michael Biggs is a sociologist not a medical doctor! Why is anyone asking him anything?!
Jazz Jennings, star of the reality TV show I Am Jazz, faced a similar issue when it came time for genital surgery. Jennings was an extremely gender-nonconforming child who would almost certainly have grown up to be a gay man but was instead transitioned at a very young age.
Jennings’s puberty was also blocked very early meaning standard vaginoplasty was not possible. Jennings required three corrective surgeries, still struggles in the dating world, and has never experienced orgasm.
Dr. Marci Bowers, Jennings’s surgeon and president of the World Professional Association for Transgender Health, is on record saying that all boys who have their puberty blocked early will never experience orgasm, which surely casts doubt on the Dutch researcher’s conclusion that “vaginal reconstruction has a positive influence on the quality of life in (transgender) women.”
https://thepostmillennial.com/trans-teen-died-from-vaginoplasty-complications-during-landmark-dutch-study-used-to-justify-child-sex-changes
It Was Not a Failure
I’m sure you herd about this but I have some things to say about it.
Listen to my podcast to find out what happened and what I think.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/after-spacexs-starship-rocket-explosiondebris-data-and-analysis-eaf6ed39
