Uncategorized

Episode 121 Show Notes – Do You See the Difference?

The Women’s March was this weekend and know seemed to have known about it. Pro-Second Amendment protesters showed up in Virginia, with guns and all, to protest Gov. Northam’s new laws banning guns in certain areas. The media and celebrities spread lies. And Cocaine Mitch has released the impeachment rules.

 

What If You Held a Protest and No One Showed?

Carmen Perez, the only Women’s March “co-founder” left at the group after a purge of organizers earlier this year stemming from allegations of anti-Semitism within the Women’s March’s ranks, told USA Today that she hoped to see a re-energized group of marchers, but it doesn’t seem her hopes materialized.

The main march happened in Washington D.C., Chicago and Los Angeles. But the crowds didn’t materialize.

The Women’s March was organized to deal with three main issue areas: immigration, climate, and reproductive justice. But the message has been muddled. In Chicago, the issues seem to include fair wages for women and housing. But events also protested the imaginary war with Iran.

Perez says she believes that the country has “protest burnout.” Competing organization like MoveOn.org see to be taking their thunder.

But it seems that anti-Semitism has stained the organization.

That’s, apparently, by design. Perez is the only original Women’s March organizer that’s left after three top Women’s March officials — Linda Sarsour, Tamika Mallory, and Bob Bland — departed the organization following a pair of blockbuster reports revealing that Sarsour, Mallory, and Bland tolerated anti-Semitism in the organization’s highest ranks, and that Sarsour and Mallory actively aligned the Women’s March with the virulently anti-Semitic Nation of Islam.

Why I cover them is because they do some stupid things. Look at this clip when organizers in Washington D.C. tried to lead a dance and song (both in Spanish and English, of course). This performance was started with a kazoo (yeah, a kazoo) and initiated by a whistle.

Ugh, watch:

 

https://www.dailywire.com/news/the-womens-march-took-place-saturday-and-attendance-was-way-down-again

 

The Ruthless Violence That Never Happened

Gov. Ralph Northam, a Democrat, had declared a state of emergency late last week and beefed up security around the Capitol.

Pro-Second Amendment activist showed up, all legally carrying their firearms, in protest of the law.

Guess what happened? Absolutely nothing.

Well not nothing. They did carry American flags, the racists. The did carry the “Don’t Tread on Me” flag, the racists. They did say the Pledge of Allegiance, the racists. The sang the Star Spangled Banner, the racists. They carried their guns, the terrorists.

NBC reported this rally as a White Supremacist rally when Tweeting:

He wasn’t the only one.There were White Supremacists there. But they were few and quickly sent away. In fact, a groups was prevented from attending.

Intellectual actress, Alyssa Milano sounded out on Twitter:

 

Our politicians of the Left said the same thing. Listen to the lies coming out of her mouth in this diatribe in front of people who completely agree with her:

Couple of problems with what the intellectual AOC said:

  • Very few Confederate flags. 20:1 American flags over Confederate flags. When I was watching the videos, I didn’t see one Confederate flag.
  • Martin Luther King never wanted to overturn the Second Amendment. Or the Constitution at all. He just wanted people of color to be included.
  • Also on the race thing, the crowd was diverse. There were White, Blacks and Hispanics. This had nothing to do with race.
  • Freddie Gray died because the police were following the laws that Democrats put into law. Regulations are bad.
  • There’s no police officers at the protest? Yes, there were. They were supporting the protesters. And, if someone is going to do something bad, everyone is armed and can handle it. Compare that to a protest in a gun controlled state when Antifa is involved.

 

Listen, the Second Amendment was made to protect the First Amendment.

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

In other words, to protect us from tyranny, we need to be able to fight.

 

Do You See the Difference Between Protests on the Left and Right?

 

 

https://www.foxnews.com/us/virginia-capitol-gun-rights-rally
https://dailycaller.com/2020/01/20/nbc-reporter-tweet-gun-rights-rally-white-supremacist/
https://www.dailywire.com/news/this-is-terrorism-alyssa-milano-other-democrats-triggered-by-pro-2a-protesters-in-va
https://thefederalist.com/2018/04/13/britains-knife-control-bad-parody-gun-control/

 

 

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trump-impeachment-trial-senate_n_5e1c82c7c5b650c621e250a9

spacer

Episode 120 Show Notes – The Gloves are Off!

Impeachment is getting real as Trump gets some high profile names on his legal team. Right before the impeachment trial, Trump gets some more bad news. I guess it’s bad news. A jerk from the NFL acts like a jerk at the NCAA Men’s Football Championship and gets an arrest warrant for his jerkiness. And the Dodger got screwed…twice.

 

He Knows How to Pick a Dream Team

Trump added some major players to his legal staff. They include:

  • Kenneth Starr – Was the independant investigator during the Clinton impeachment.
  • Robert Ray – Replaced Kenneth Starr during the Clinton impeachment and wrote the final report on Clinton.
  • Alan Dershowitz – Harvard Law professor specializing in Constitutional law and defense attorney for OJ Simpson

 

Dershowitz is a liberal and voted for Hillary Clinton. He has also been implicated with Jeffry Epstein. Expect to hear his name being trashed by the media.

The three will join White House Counsel Pat Cipollone and Trump’s personal lawyer Jay Sekulow to represent Trump in the trial.

On Thursday, the Government Accountability Office issued its report on the White House temporarily freezing U.S. security aid allocated for Ukraine, concluding that President Trump violated the Impoundment Control Act by “substitut[ing] his own policy priorities for those that Congress has enacted into law.” Trump responded Friday morning by tweeting out a quote from Harvard Law’s Alan Dershowitz, who argues that the GAO has it “exactly backwards.”

Trump responded on Twitter:

Essentially, when Congress approves funds, the President must alert Congress and explain why he is withholding those funds. This act was passed in 1974 during the Nixon administration. Nixon was withholding funds that were approved by Congress that did not require the President’s signature. The law is meant to remove the President’s ability to impound funds for programs he did not approve.

Though the Democrats will point this out during the impeachment hearings, this is not an impeachable offense. If Congress discovered that funds they approved were withheld, they would take the President to court to force him to explain why the funds were withheld. So it is not considered a high crime or misdemeanor.

There is thought that, since the President did release the funds to Ukraine, the law does not apply.

There is also a question as to the law’s Constitutionality. It basically removes oversight from the President, especially if it goes against his policy, either foreign or domestic. And example would be if Congress approves from Iran and the President wants to stop it. That’s a loose example but that is the oversight a lot of scholars question and it has not been directly answered by the Supreme Court.

Finally, the “evidence” of Trump’s corruption comes from a guy named Lev Parness. Parness is a Ukrainian with a very checked history. He says that he has evidence, including text messages using WhatsApp with Republican Congressional candidate Robert Hyde

Parness says he worked with Rudy Giuliani and followed U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch because, he says, Trump didn’t like or trust her.

Democrats love him. He has been cruising MSNBC, CNN and other news outlets saying that he should testify in the impeachment hearings because he knows everything. Nancy Pelosi said he could be a very important witness.

Yeah. I think we’ve seen this movie before. This guy has some issues:

  • He’s under indictment in New York for corruption including forging paperwork.
  • Ukrainian officials said he is corrupt and no one should trust him.
  • Robert Hyde said he thought the text messages were a joke and doesn’t understand why they are being take seriously.
  • President Trump never met or spoke to him and the picture with him and Parness was a photo op.
  • Parness admits he never talked to Trump. He said he got messages from Giuliani.
  • His evidence are his own notes and the text messages. That’s it. No phone records or metadata or recordings. Just his notes.

 

The Democrats seem to always do this. They get the dregs of society like Michael Cohen and Michael Avenatti and parade them around like they have any legitimacy.

And it’s just getting started. Mark my words, this is going to get ugly.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/trumps-impeachment-team-adds-more-big-names-two-from-bill-clinton-report
https://www.dailywire.com/news/trump-responds-to-gao-report-saying-he-violated-law-in-withholding-ukraine-aid
https://www.dailywire.com/news/man-at-center-of-new-ukraine-allegations-democrats-have-their-panties-in-a-bunch-over-drunken-jokes-on-whatsapp
https://www.dailywire.com/news/ukraine-opens-investigation-into-surveillance-of-u-s-ambassador-after-dems-release-outrageous-whatsapp-texts

 

 

Give the Kid a Break

LSU defeated Clemson on Monday to win the NCAA National Championship in football. And how do champions celebrate their victory? The light up cigars. That’s what they did. Most of them did it.

It’s odd but, OK, I’d do it.

https://youtu.be/XRV9BEDwTy8

You can imagine with everyone smoking cigars, there going to be a heck of a haze in the locker room.

Well, it’s illegal to smoke indoors in Georgia. The police gently warned the players to stop but the players thought the cops were joking.

It took the police threatening to arrest the players if they did not stop smoking. Odell Beckham Jr. smack a cop in the butt because he thought he was kidding.

Come on, man. Give the kids a break. They’re not shooting meth.

https://www.foxnews.com/sports/lsu-tigers-threatened-arrest-smoking-report
https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/28496532/new-orleans-police-issue-arrest-warrant-browns-odell-beckham-jr

 

Dodgers Got Screwed!

Heads are rolling in Major League Baseball. There is a huge cheating scandal that involves the Houston Astros and Boston Red Sox.

These teams even cheated in the world series. Here’s a clip from Jomboy Media on YouTube showing how the Astros cheated.

Apparently what these teams did is use a camera in the outfield to steal the signs.There was a small monitor in the dugout. A player would then hit a trash can whenever the pitch was an off-speed pitch, which are harder to hit because of the speed change.

· Manager A.J. Hinch suspended for one year. Hinch was then fired by the Astros.
· GM Jeff Luhnow suspended for one year. Luhnow was then fired by the Astros.
· Former assistant GM Brandon Taubman suspended one year.
· Astros forfeit their first- and second- round draft picks the next two years.
· Astros fined $5 million, the maximum allowed under MLB‘s constitution.
– Alex Cora of the Red Sox has been fired
– Carlos Beltran of the Mets has been fired.

The Dodgers lost to both the Astros and Red Sox in the middle of this scandal.

The MLB has not decided what it is going to do with their world titles.

https://www.cbssports.com/mlb/news/houston-astros-cheating-scandal-10-things-we-learned-from-mlbs-nine-page-investigative-report/

 

There’s Dialog?

 

https://www.dailywire.com/news/deaf-man-sues-pornhub-for-lack-of-subtitles

spacer

Episode 119 – Let’s Get Ready to Rumble!

Who won, who lost and who does CNN like. The Articles of Impeachment are delivered to the Senate and they are wasting no time getting this thing on the road.

 

So, Who Won?

There were no big winners in last night’s debate and there were not the fireworks I was hoping to see three weeks before the Iowa caucuses.

The winners:

  1. Joe Biden – He still looks old but he didn’t gaff and should not lose any support.
  2. Amy Klobachar – She had strong points and looked like the real moderate.
  3. Bernie Sanders – The old commie just stuck to his guns. He won’t lose any supporters to Warren.
  4. Donald Trump – These guys all look terrible.
  5. Anyone who didn’t watch it – Pretty boring. Not as many fireworks that I hoped there would be.

 

The losers:

  1. Elizabeth Warren – She really needs to lay the pipe on Sanders and Biden but she always hold back. Probably the Indian thing.
  2. Pete Buttigieg – He failed to answer a few question and was forgettable. I think we might be seeing the beginning of the end for him. Klobachar also exposed his lack of experience.
  3. Tom Steyer – I can’t believe he spent so much money to have 1% and he sounded crazy.

 

Grag Gutfeld Tweeted right after the debate and it summed it all up:

There were some funny things that happened. Grabian released a montage of Joe Biden stumbling around. It’s pretty funny.

Yep, that’s the leading Democratic Presidential candidate. Trump will eat his lunch for him.

Bernie Sanders turned out to be CNN’s punching bag. Story of the leaked statement.

There was also a comical moment when Bernie and Warren. Warren, during a private meeting, said that Bernie Sanders told her a woman cannot win the Presidency.

 

 

 

 

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/jeanne-zaino-iowa-democratic-debate-winners-and-losers

 

Here We Go!

Nancy Pelosi has chosen her managers for the impeachment trial. They include

What a rambling speech. Notice she had to puts in the “impeachment last forever.” That’s because it’s going to lose in the Senate. The only victory she has is the impeachment.

There will be seven managers including Jerry Nadler and Adam Schiff. Adam Schiff will be the lead manager.

But the funniest moment was the Democrats walking the articles to the Senate and the reaction by the media. Grabian has a great montage.

Chances are high that there will be a trial. Republicans just don’t have enough votes to reach an immediate acquittal and I’m happy about that. I want to have a trial and let the dice roll. In fact I think it would be a shame if we never have one.

This is going to be a real hardship for Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobachar because they will need to stay during the trial when they should be on the campaign trail. I real don’t think it is going to make any difference.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pelosi-announces-trump-impeachment-managers

 

More News

https://www.foxnews.com/science/mystery-of-orb-in-a-record-breaking-leonardo-da-vinci-painting-deepens

 

 

 

spacer

Episode 115 Show Notes – Looking Like a Genius

Iran has finally struck back against The United States for the killing of Qessem Soleimani. Sort of. Trump confirms that World War III has ended in about 72 hours, but it this really the end? Democrats continue to doom-say. And the media is doing yeoman’s work covering this and for making Iran and Soleimani look like heroes. .

 

Revenge?

Last night, Iran launched 22 ballistic missiles aimed at Iraqi bases holding American soldiers. Trump gathered his security council and watched for reports. He said he would address the nation after reports came in.

What was different about this attack was the missiles originated from Iran and they weren’t just rockets.

In total, eighteen missiles landed, four never detonated and there were casualties reported.

As the hours passed, there were no American casualties and reports stated there may not be any Iraqi casualties. Trump cancels his address to the nation. Instead, he Tweeted:

The Iranian ambassador also made announcement, again, via Twitter:

Then there was the Ayatollah:

This is why I wait 24 hours.

The next morning, we find that there were no casualties and the missiles did not hit any populated bases.

We also find out the Iran contacted Iraq and warned them that there was going to be an attack. Iraq contacted the United States and cleared the bases under attack.

Iran reported that 30 people were killed. The United States and reported that there were no casualties.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/irans-foreign-minister-we-do-not-seek-escalation-or-war-irans-supreme-leader-military-actions-not-enough
https://www.dailywire.com/news/breaking-iran-releases-statement-claiming-responsibility-for-attacks
https://www.foxnews.com/world/us-military-iran-iraq-missile-attack-warning-officials

 

Genius?

Trump made the following ten minute speech on Wednesday. Everyone could not wait:

There are a few things to look at with this speech.

We will remain strong and retaliate if Iran or any of its proxies kill Americans. This is huge.

The United States will place more sanctions on Iran for their attacks.

He has offered an olive branch and hopes for their success.

Trump did not tear Iran up or say how this was a set up or they were incompetent. This is big because Trump will give Iran the chance to save face.

Trump wants the rest of the world to realize that Iran is a menace.

Finally, World War III is over and Trump will deescalate.

This was one of his most important speeches in his Presidency and he hit it out of the park.

But is Iran now the eunuch we have always wanted them? Not at all. Here are some issues:

  • This could be a head-fake by Iran as pointed out by Dan Bongino. This could be to give Iran time to plan something big.
  • Iran will continue to poke at the United States with attacks. Trump has drawn a red line and he must make sure there will be consequences.
  • We need to monitor their nuclear program. It could be they are waiting to develop a nuclear bomb, creating a mutual assured destruction scenario (Dan Bongino).

 

I think the second scenario is most likely. I think this was an effort to save face. I also don’t think we’ve heard the end of them. I’m sure they will continue with their activities but distance themselves. These activities will avoid Americans and be smash-and-grab operations.

Iran has way too much to lose:

  • Iran’s army and revolutionary guard are huge. But that matters only in a ground war. Trump does not want a ground war.
  • Iran’s air force and navy are almost non-existent. It won’t take much to knock their military into the stone age.
  • Iran’s ballistic missiles are mobile and hard to hit, but their air defenses are way out of date.
  • Iran’s nuclear program may be a target. Our bunker buster bombs including the MOAB (Massive Ordinance Air Blast bomb) have proven extremely effective.
  • If we hit only a couple of Iran’s oil refineries, Iran’s economy would be toast.

 

Iran cannot have a relationship with the United States. I love Trump’s reaching out but it won’t happen.

 

Who’s Side Are You On, Anyway?

The press has been a disaster in this whole thing. Listen to this montage by Grabian actually mourning the loss of Qessem Soleimani:

When Soleimani was killed, we heard what kind of hero was killed and how Trump destabilized the Middle East and how they now hate us. Please.

When Iran made threats, they said that Trump is starting World War III. No, he was setting a precedence of deterrence.

Now that World War III is not happening, after a day, they are saying it was because of the reasonable leadership in Iran that countered our insane orange man.

Ugh. These guys are pushing propaganda.

 

spacer

Episode 91 Show Notes – Good Riddance

A big victory for the United States, Donald Trump and the war on terrorism.

 

What Happen?

On Saturday night, sixty members of the U.S. military including Army Rangers and Delta Force swooped in on a compound in Syria based on the tip from a Kurdish spy. The target was the leader of ISIS, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. The plan was in the works for weeks and al-Baghdadi was under surveillance. The military knew he was there.

Six helicopters stormed the compound. al-Baghdadi, with his two wives and some of his kids, tried to escape through a tunnel. He was with three of his children. Seeing that he was not going to escape and not wanting to be captured, al-Baghdadi set off a suicide vest he was wearing, killing himself and the three children he was with (who were also wearing suicide vests). It’s rumored that the explosion was caught on camera and can be seen in the video below but it has not been confirmed.

There wasn’t much left of al-Baghdadi, as you can imagine, and the tunnel collapsed from the explosion, but DNA did identify him. President Trump made the following statement and it was a strong one.

This is a guy they have been hunting for a few years. Good riddance to bad rubbish.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-states-al-baghdadi-was-whimpering-and-crying-before-death-in-u-s-operation-he-died-like-a-coward
https://www.dailywire.com/news/defense-officials-release-shocking-details-of-al-baghdadi-raid-six-helicopters-50-70-members-of-delta-forcehttps://www.dailywire.com/news/watch-president-trump-confirms-death-of-isis-leader-abu-bakr-al-baghdadihttps://www.dailywire.com/news/breaking-isis-leader-killed-in-trump-authorized-military-raid

 

Who is Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi

Abū Bakr al-Baghdadi was born in 1973 in Iraq. He was a quiet kid, non-threatening and quiet with few friends. He did not do particularly well in school. He had to take his high school exams twice in order to retrieve his certificate. His high school grades were not good enough to study science and law in college. Instead, he studies the Koran and Islamist law. Many saw him as non violent.

It is rumored that he became radicalized while serving as a cleric in Iraq under Saddam Hussein. The United States invaded after the 9/11 attacks and he was arrested. He was held for a time but was eventually released because the United States did not see him as a threat.

In 2010, al-Baghdadi was announced as the leader of ISI (Islamic State of Iraq) after the death of  Abu Omar al-Baghdadi. ISI was a sub-group of Osama Bin Laden’s Al Qaeda. Upon the death of Bin Laden, al-Baghdadi started a series of attacks. There are way too many to go over. Look at the wikipedia article. In all, al-Baghdadi was responsible for ordering terrorist attacks that caused more than 2000 deaths.

When the United States left Iraq under Obama and the lack of leadership and weakening of Al Qaeda due to Bin Laden’s death, ISI expanded it’s grip on Iraq and spread to Syria. That brought to life the Islamic State of Iraq and Levant (ISIL) also known as the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS). That was 2013.

The rest is history.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Bakr_al-Baghdadi
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_State_of_Iraq_and_the_Levant

 

The Reaction

So you know that this can’t be a celebrated accomplishment by everyone in the United States. You know, kind of like it was when Obama authorized the killing of Osama Bin Laden. I hated Obama but thought he did a great job authorizing bin Laden’s death. The problem the Left is having is finding something to be pissed about.

Oh, here’s one. Trump didn’t alert Congress. He kept the operation close to the vest. Here’s what Adam “i don’t give a” Schiff said:

“In terms of notifying the Gang of Eight, that wasn’t done. Look, the reason to notify the Gang of Eight is frankly more important when things go wrong. If — the president said it was dangerous flying in. The Russians could have shot down American planes. Had this escalated, had something gone wrong, had we gotten into a firefight with the Russians, it’s to the administration’s advantage to be able to say, ‘We informed Congress we were going in, they were aware of the risks. We at least gave them the chance to provide feedback.’ That wasn’t done here. I think that’s a mistake.”

BS!

Trump didn’t alert Congress because of the leaking that has been going on. He didn’t want this operation getting to the ears of the enemy and then having dead soldiers because the ISIS leader knew it was coming. This is the leakiest administration in U.S. history. Adam Schiff is the greatest culprit. He’s like a badly manufactured Depends diaper. He leaks all over the place.

And these people don’t care if military people die as long as it makes Trump look bad. You think if this escalated, Schiff would have defended Trump? Come on, man!

Not to mention, Trump doesn’t need to report this to Congress. Congress already authorized a $25 million reward for this guy, dead or alive. Trump just saved us $25 million (no, he didn’t in reality).

But that wasn’t the biggest screw up.

The Washington Post Initially posted the headline:

“Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, Islamic State’s ‘terrorist-in-chief,’ dies at 48.”

Mind you, this is bad. It makes it sound like he died of a peanut allergy not a coordinated attack by the U.S. military, taking Trump and the military completely out of it.

When Obama had Bin Laden killed, it was made out that Obama went to Pakistan and killed Bin Laden himself with a butter knife. No, he did exactly what Trump did. He approved the operation and the military, the real heroes, killed this sack of trash.

But I digress.

The point is that the description of a radical Islamist terrorist is racist. So they change the headline describing him as an “austere religious scholar at the helm of the Islamic State.”

This is a man who ran a terror organization that killed thousands. He has kidnapped am American woman, tortured and raped her before she died under unknown circumstances and he blew himself up along with three of his kids.

This is not a good guy. I’m surprised that the Washington Post gives a damn about what they are going to call this filthy animal or any of the animals he controls.

Finally, serial liar and former Obama adviser, Susan Rice, complained that Trump never attempted to contact the former president before the attack. She said that it was customary that a President contact his predecessor when an operation of this magnitude is going to take place. I say so what? Obama had a shot to kill this guy and rescue some of the hostages he was holding. He decided to wait seven weeks before attacking an empty compound and letting those hostages continue to be tortured and, eventually, killed. He doesn’t deserve a thing.

 

 

 

https://www.dailywire.com/news/trump-didnt-notify-pelosi-other-leaders-before-raid-on-isis-leader
https://www.dailywire.com/news/58280
https://www.dailywire.com/news/susan-rice-complains-that-trump-should-have-informed-obama-about-killing-isis-leader

 

spacer

Episode 85 Show Notes – What a Mess in Syria!

Here are the links and full videos from the podcast. I did not have a script so all there is in this post is references.

 

 

 

 

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-50080737
https://www.dailywire.com/news/white-house-announces-troop-withdrawl-from-syrian-border-to-allow-turkish-invasion
https://www.dailywire.com/news/lindsey-graham-responds-to-trump-pulling-troops-from-syria
https://www.dailywire.com/news/zilberman-the-u-s-is-enabling-turkeys-adversarial-behavior
https://www.dailywire.com/news/watch-trump-reveals-what-the-hardest-part-of-his-job-is-during-emotional-speech
https://nypost.com/2019/10/11/doctors-warn-women-not-to-use-toothpaste-to-tighten-their-vaginas/

spacer

Podcast #70 Shownotes

A whistle blower files a report against Donald Trump about a conversation he had with the President of Ukraine. This could be the death knell for the Biden campaign (hint: things ain’t going well for Biden in Iowa). And the democrats finally pull the trigger (sort of).

 

Trump and Ukraine

This story broke last week but we didn’t know much about it. Guess what? We still don’t know much about it. The story involves a whistle blower complaint that Donald Trump was speaking to the newly elected President of Ukraine. We’re still guessing as to what may have happened but there are two things that could have happened: Trump divulged classified data to a foriegn leader or Trump made a quid pro quo (you know, you scratch my back and I’ll scratech yours) offer to the President.

Of course, President Trump vehemently denies the allegation. He says that it was only a congratulatory call to the Ukrainian president for winning his election. He said there are transcripts, witnesses and recordings and he is looking into releasing them along with the actual complaint. Trump dismisses it as another attempt at his enemies trying to drum up a new narrative. Trump did admit to talking about Biden because of the scandal that is going to dog Biden from here on out. But that doesn’t matter. Dems are now screaming for impeachment…again.

Trump is going on the offensive. He has decided to attack Joe Biden about his own little indiscretions with Ukraine.

This one could be big. It might be the final blow to knock Biden out of the race. But let’s finish this story first.

This is really a non-story. Trump is President of the United States. He’s going to talk to other leaders. He has to talk to other leaders. He’s constatntly with people and being monitored. His calls are recorded. Trump may not be smart but he’s not stupid. He’s not going to say anything that’s going to get him into trouble especially since it is one investiggation after another.

But here’s the other thing: the vitriol of the left is just so expected. No one know what’s in this complaint (an anonymous complaint at that). And then we find out tonight that the guy who issues the complaints wasn’t even present during the conversation. Trump says he’ll release whatever he has to but he shouldn’t. His conversations with other leaders should be private and he should not cowtow to the complaints from a groups of people that are always going to complain.

The democrats want to impeach, go for it.

 

Biden’s Problems Might Be A Bigger Issue

I knew this was going to come out. I heard about it from Dan Bongino about a year ago. Listen to his podcast and read his books, they are extremely informative. His books Spygate and his latest, Exonerated are so packed with information about this Trump conspiracy mess that it might take a couple of readings to understand.

This story has been around for a long time. Back in 2014, Hunter Biden got put on the board of a gas company called Burisma. He was earning $50,000 a month. He had no experience with energy much less gas. An attorney there started investigating Burisma for corruption.  Joe Biden, who was dealing with a loan of $1.4 billion to Ukraine, said he would not release the money unless this attorney doing the investigating was fired. Ukraine fired the attorney.

Now, this is kind of open news. This wasn’t something covered up. If fact, here’s Biden at a press conference bragging about having the attorney fired:

 

Is this a sign of a quid pro quo deal between Biden and Ukraine? Who knows? The attorney in Ukraine was known for corruption and many believed he should have been fired. Maybe Biden wanted a corrupt politician fired, not for a conflict of interest, but because he didn’t want to drop $1.4 billion on a corrupt country. It’s possible.

Where there needs to be an investigation is to find out where the smoke is coming from. This wasn’t the first time Hunter, who could never hold a job and was kicked out of the Navy because of drugs, got some high level position. He also got a high paying “job” in China. Coincidentally, Joe Sleepy, Creepy Joe was also  working with the Chinese at the same time. It’s definitely very suspicious.

 

What Do I Think?

Trump shoots his mouth up. He ain’t the most professional speaker. I bet a dollar he also shot his mouth talking to the newly elected President of Ukraine. Was it a quid pro quo: a Biden investigation for $400 million dollars? I doubt it. Why? a few reasons. The anonymous whistleblower wasn’t even in the room when the conversation took place. Sounds like swamp politics to me. Trump is willing to release the transcripts of the conversation with the President of the Ukraine. He’s not hiding anything. Finally, the democrats don’t want to see the transcripts (which is what I want to see) they want to see the complaint. Why would they not want to see transcripts? Because accusations are far more important to democrats than evidence. Especially evidence that doesn’t lead to anything.

To gain proof that Trump is being targeted, he’s bringing up Biden’s malthisians. And it’s hitting the target. Biden is stressing out. And He’ll have a lot to answer for in the next debate.

As far as Biden goes, there is, again, no evidence he did anything. There’s a lot of smoke and a lot of coincidences. But no evidence. Should we investigate? Probably, he’s running for President. If he wasn’t I wouldn’t care less. But this is going to kill Presidential bid whether he’s innocent or not. His gafs are one thing but the image of him being corrupt might be the final straw. As of this week, Elizabeth Warren is winning in the polls in Iowa. I think Biden’s run is done and Elizabeth Warren will be the nominee.

 

Democrats Do What The Democrats Do

Nancy Pelosi, the Speaker of the House, just dropped a MOAB of the democrats chances of winning the presidency for 2020. Listen.

Yep, they’re starting an inquiry of impeachment. It was kind of hard to understand because Nancy’s dentures kept rolling around. Nancy got together with all the other House democrats and they decided to go for it.

Sort of.

What an impeachment inquiry means is they are going to do a bunch of investigations (which will take six months to a year) where they are doing nothing else. Then, they will see if they have enough votes for impeachment (which, as of now, they don’t). Once that’s done, they’ll send this to the House Judiciary Committee which will vote. They will hold more hearings and vote. If it gets through that, it will then voted on the floor of the House. If it passes the House vote (only a majority is needed) it will go to the Senate for a trial. The senate won’t convict because the trial would be crap.

The House is wasting time and are doing nothing during all these investigations. They will lose the House, Senate and Presidency in 2020. By a landslide.

And that may mean there might not be another democratic President for twenty years because Mike Pence will run and win. He’s smart and likable. Then Nikki Halley will win because she’s smart and likable. I we still have Ben Crenshaw.

This is going to be a disaster for democrats.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/sep/22/trump-ukraine-scandal-joe-biden
https://www.wsj.com/articles/bidens-anticorruption-effort-in-ukraine-overlapped-with-sons-work-in-country-11569189782
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pelosi-expected-to-announce-formal-impeachment-inquiry-against-trump-at-5-pm-et

spacer

Podcast #68 Show Notes: It’s All Falling Apart

The Brett Kavanaugh thing is falling apart and the Dems seem to be getting quieter. Iran makes a bold move but Trump thinks patience is the key.

 

Brett Kavanaugh’s Saga Continues

The Brett Kavanaugh New York Times debacle continues. I probably should have given this a couple of days before publishing this story. It’s getting juicer. Just as a reminder, the New York Times published an article last Saturday that stated that there was another accuser. Remember? Someone push Kavanaugh’s junk into some woman’s hand. The accuser, Max Stier, who I said was a Clinton supporter, was actually on Clinton’s legal team during Clinton’s impeachment hearings.

You notice that all the accusers are heavy democrat supporters? Hmm.

Not only did the New York Times not point that out, they forgot to mention that no one at the party remembered the event, including the “victim.” The “victim” refuses to be interviewed.

They have been getting a plethora of crap from everyone including the left wing media.

CNN’s Oliver Darcy writes:

“It was the latest in a series of high-profile blunders that has caused embarrassment to James Bennet since he was appointed in 2016 as the editor overseeing The Times’ Opinion section. Bennet’s tenure has been marked with several mishaps that have generated controversy, drawn criticism, and spurred at least one lawsuit … While the Opinion section has unquestionably produced strong work in the years since Bennet took over, it has also been culpable for some of the biggest journalistic black eyes at The Times during that period.”

CNN’s Brian Steltzer said:

“Times turmoil take disciplinary action in the wake of this embarrassing episode.”

The Washington Post’s Erik Wemple said:

“The roar from the Internet left the New York Times with some explaining to do. How did this piece land in the Sunday Review section? What was going on here?”

Further, it has been reported that the Washington Post and the New York news division refused to run the story because it was unverified. What I didn’t know was that the story was run in the Review section of the New York Times.

Well, the authors,  Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly, in attempt at saving a little face, when on The View and did what all left wingers do: throw someone else under the bus. Watch:

Of course Trump is going to sat something. And, you know something, what he said pretty much follows the democratic model: Cancel Culture. This is when someone screws up, there’s outrage, he apologizes, the outrage grows, then he’s either fired or resigns in disgrace. This happens all the time now. Trump says we should do the same thing:

Yep, that should happen. There should be consequences for bad reporting. These people should be fired and Brett Kavanaugh should sue the New York Times. But it’s not going to happen. But, what is happening is the left’s attempt to influence the a judge’s decisions, especially when it comes to that crappy law of Roe vs. Wade. I’ve talked about Roe vs. Wade in a previous podcast so I won’t bring that back up again. But, as a reminder, privacy is not more important than a human life.

But the real news story that is not being brought up by the media is the fact that this whole thing with Kavanaugh was a political hit job. No one; not CNN or MSNBC or CBS of ABC or NBC brought this up.

 

That’s right! The whole Brett Kavanaugh-thing was crap. We shouldn’t be surprised. If they can kill babies, is it a shock they would kill the reputation of an honored judge? Why are they doing this? Because they are trying to shame Kavanaugh into doing what they want. It’s horrific.

But there’s more. Blasry Ford’s best friend, Leland Keyser, reportedly did not believe Blasey Ford! She refused to testify. She says she was threatened to have her reputation ruined if she didn’t testify. And it’s in the book that the times based this story from! And the NY Times ignored it! This book that tried to throw Kavanaugh under the bus just proved that Kavanaugh was targeted.

And none of the left wing media reported it. I hate the term “fake news,” but it fits. Our news media has an agenda.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/51879/cnn-wapo-admit-nyt-has-big-egg-its-face-after-paul-boishttps://www.dailywire.com/news/51863/report-nyt-news-department-washington-post-turned-emily-zanottihttps://www.dailywire.com/news/51857/nyt-tries-answer-questions-kavanaugh-report-james-barrett

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

https://www.dailywire.com/news/51857/nyt-tries-answer-questions-kavanaugh-report-james-barrett
https://www.dailywire.com/news/51899/california-bans-state-funded-travel-iowa-ted-cruz-hank-berrien

spacer

Podcast #66: Please, Please Leave the Penguins Alone!

California is working very hard to screw itself completely to Hell. There are gay penguins in a London zoo and the zoo has decided to be diverse. And Monopoly has decided to correct its original patriarchal board game.

Oh, and there was another democratic debate.

 

California Is On Fire!

California continues to screw its citizens by implementing the dumbest laws while ignoring the real problems.

The first law is AB 5 which states that companies can no longer “misclassify” workers as independent contractors has passed the California senate and is expected to be signed into law by Gov. Gavin Newsome. This law will mostly effect companies like Uber and Lyft. Employers will now be on the hook for overtime, health insurance and retirement benefits.  This will also allow employees who have been “misclassified” will have the ability to unionize.

Tyranny is alive and well in California. But I’m happy about that this law will just make things worse in California. Then, maybe, people of this state will begin to see the incompetence of the left in California and vote them out. This law s going to make California worse.

Uber and Lyft, which were the companies targeted, will simply stop service in California. This will cost the citizens the loss of a great service which is very affordable. It will also cost thousands of people who are in between jobs or need extra money to lose that easy opportunity to drive and make a few extra bucks.

This is just a crappy law.

https://www.vox.com/2019/9/11/20851034/california-ab-5-workers-labor-unions

 

In another ingenious move to try to create housing for the homeless, the state legislature passed a bill that would allow a statewide rent control. This law would limit rent increases to 5% after inflation. It also disallows evictions without cause which is what Newsome believes is the problem with the homeless.

I have three problems with this. First, the cities and state already regulate the hell out of landlords. That’s why rent is expensive. My family used to own apartment buildings that were under rent control. They never made any money because they were bled by the bureaucracy. They couldn’t wait to get rid of the apartments but, because everyone knew about it, had a hard time selling.

Second, this will have the reverse issue and will cause a greater housing crisis. People are not going to build apartments if they cannot be profitable.

And finally, the state is assuming that the reason people are on the streets because they cannot find a place to live. That’s just not the case. Most, not all, are living on the street because they are unable to function well enough to be able to afford an apartment. They are drug addicts. They are mentally ill. Or they just don’t want to hold a job and want to live on the street. Even if the theory would work and people build more apartments, for whatever reasons, these people will still be on the street.

This is another way that California is avoiding the problem.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-california-rent/california-approves-statewide-rent-control-to-deal-with-housing-crunch-idUSKCN1VX00H

 

California has one of the worst education systems in the United States. Kids that come out of California schools don’t know how to read, or write, or science, or math. They learn about climate change, diversity, the 63 different pronouns and how to have anal sex. Well, they may not be able to get in a college and get good jobs but at least they’re entitled.

I am on Twitter all the time (@RunninFewl) and, almost every day, and there is always a video of some brat yelling at a teacher because he’s not allowed to play Angry Birds on his iPhone X. At that point, at least the teacher could kick him out. Now they can’t.

Our kids are way too entitled and not at all disciplined. Oh, and I forgot uneducated, have no work ethic and are completely unprepared, not only for getting a job, but also for facing the difficulties of day-to-day life.

Good job, California!

https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/460795-california-governor-signs-bill-banning-schools-from-suspending-students

 

Gay Penguins?

A London aquarium has announced that two lesbian penguins will resist traditional sexual stereotypes while raising their adopted chick. Four-month-old baby Gentoo will be “the world’s first penguin to not have its gender assigned,” Sea Life London exulted.

General Manager Graham McGrath said, “While the decision may ruffle a few feathers, gender neutrality in humans has only recently become a widespread topic of conversation, however, it is completely natural for penguins to develop genderless identities as they grow into mature adults.”

The Sea Life London announcement recalls a similar episode 15 years ago, when The New York Times fêted two allegedly homosexual penguins at the Central Park Zoo. “Roy and Silo, two chinstrap penguins at the Central Park Zoo in Manhattan, are completely devoted to each other,” wrote the Gray Lady. “For nearly six years now, they have been inseparable. They … have sex. Silo and Roy are, to anthropomorphize a bit, gay penguins. When offered female companionship, they have adamantly refused it.” The zoo even went so far as to take an egg from a normal penguin couple and let the “gay penguins raise it. The baby penguin was born and taken care of but the story had a sad ending. Roy and Silo hooked up with female penguins. And no one saw the two ever have sex as was reported. Oops.

Have we gotten so stupid? This isn’t a study. These idiots are trying to raise a “gender neutral” penguin chick. This reminds me of when biologists in Santa Monica, California were given a grant to find out how many gay seagulls there were. They dsaid that up to 60% of the seagulls could be gay. I never heard what happened with the report. What a waste of money.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/51657/theyre-turning-frickin-penguins-gay-michael-j-knowles

 

Monopoly Got Woke!

Hasbro has decided to go woke with their next version of Monopoly! They are making a Monopoly game that will pay women more when they pass Go because of the “historical” gender wage gap.

“Unlike the classic game, women will collect 240 Monopoly bucks when they pass ‘go,’ while male players will collect the usual 200. The idea is to create a game where women make more than men, the first game to do so, according to Hasbro,” CNN reports.

It’s “a fun new take on the game that creates a world where women have an advantage often enjoyed by men,” the company said in a statement emailed to major news organizations.

This is so stupid it’s awesome. I want to buy this game. I want to play a woman. It might be the first time I play monopoly and have fun with the game. I’m not sure who said it on a Daily Wire podcast (subscribe) but men have nothing to lose when they play Monopoly. I hate Monopoly when it’s fair because I always lose on an even field (well, not always). If I play Ms. Monopoly, I’m suppose to lose. But, if I win, I am superior. Nice! I wish they’d do something like that wish chess.

 

Far More News

This week, we had the democratic debates. I watched a couple of hours. Biden won but he sounded old and he needs to get better denture adhesive. He tried to be a moderate but appeared a tad dishonest when asked a tough question.

Bernie came in second but he looks crazy so he might have lost.

Elizabeth Warren sis not answer one question and her dishonesty will cost her. But she got third.

In forth…who cares. The rest are done.

Beto and Julian Castro came in last. Beto wants to break into our houses and steal our guns. Castro is a meanie to old people.

And now we are down to three.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/51643/ms-monopoly-corrects-original-board-games-gender-emily-zanotti

spacer

Podcast #64 Show Notes: Yummy

Donald Trump cancels a secret meeting with the Taliban. Ahead of 9-11. Oops. A Swedish scientist has a not-so-insane way to end the climate “crisis.” Pierce Brosnon, a former James Bond, says it might be time for a female James Bond. And the gun control debate is still going hot and heavy. Let’s talk about “red flag” laws and the idiotic terms like “weapons of war” and “assault weapons.”

Baseball season is coming to a close and football season starts up. Love this time of year!

 

Trump and the Taliban

Donald Trump might have stepped in it last week. He was planning to hold a summit at Camp David. Who was he going to try to make peace with? Negotiators from the Taliban. That’s right. The same Taliban that ran a fascist regime in Afghanistan, participated in the planning of the 9-11 terror attacks and hid the mastermind of the attacks, Osama Bin Laden.

The meeting was meant to be secret, probably because it was not going to be a very popular meeting. Unlike North Korea, China and Russia, the Taliban has been directly involved in terrorism that has killed Americans and are guilty of massive human rights violations. It was announced yesterday that the talks were cancelled because of a bombing in Afghanistan that the Taliban took credit for. That bombing killed an American soldier. Here is Trump making that announcement:

Well, I guess Trump was able to bring us together in his way. Trump was condemned by the left and left wing media but his judgement was also questioned by the right wing media. The below stories are from one left wing publication (USA Today) and the other from the New York Post (traditionally right wing).

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/09/09/what-is-camp-david-presidential-retreat-maryland-donald-trump/2266203001/

https://nypost.com/2019/09/09/in-walking-away-from-taliban-deal-trump-showed-wisdom-obama-never-had/

The stories are similar. And they should be. There were sixteen soldiers killed in Afghanistan this year. The Taliban was responsible for all of them. They are our true enemy. They are still ruling parts of Afghanistan with an iron fist, committing all sorts of atrocities. The other problem is that the meeting and any agreement would give the terrorist organization validity, not unlike what Obama did with Iran. This could cause the legitimate government, led by Ashraf Ghani, problems in the future.

Listen, I know why Trump was trying to do this. I get why he treats China, North Korea and Russia with respect (that is until they don’t do what he wants). But this is a group of barbaric thugs that should be wiped off the face of the earth. Everything they do is for power and they will lie to get it.

 

Does Everything Have to Be Political?

The Huffington Post reports that Pierce Brosnon said, “I think we’ve watched the guys do it for the last 40 years, get out of the way, guys, and put a woman up there…I think it would be exhilarating, it would be exciting.”

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/pierce-brosnan-female-james-bond-007_n_5d764d62e4b0fde50c2a47ec

I don’t know why we can’t just leave our cultural icons alone. Why do we need a gay couple in a Disney cartoon? They have been doing cartoons for decades and no one cared before. Why do we need a gay couple in one of the Star Wars films? Sexuality has never been an issue in the Star Wars films before. Why do Captain America and Ghostbusters have to be remade with an all female cast? Why do DC and Marvel feel the need to add gay characters? Isn’t the asexuality of super heroes is what gives them their invulnerability to time and flaws of humanity as described by Umberto Eco in his article, “The Myth of Superman?”

Why can’t they just make offshoots of these films with new, female characters? Why does anyone need to be gay or trans?

 

San Francisco Just Blew It for Red Flag Laws

With the onset of several mass shootings over the past year, there has been a real push for some sort of gun control laws that limit those who may have mental problems cannot get a hold of a gun or would have guns already owned by a mentally unstable individual taken away until an evaluation is done on this individual. Even Donald Trump, who is a strong supporter for the Second Amendment, is open to some out-of-the-box solutions for monitoring those with mental health problems. This is a voluntary program and would using existing technology to monitor these people. You can read about the proposal below.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/51566/prevent-mass-shootings-trump-looks-controversial-james-barrett

This proposal goes a little short of the “red flag” laws that the left has been pushing over the past few months. In case you’re wondering, red flag laws would allow people to report people who may be acting erratically. It is then that the authorities can confiscate guns or prevent the purchase of guns by these individuals.

This has had a luke warm response from pro Second Amendment folks. And after what the San Francisco city council did, any warmth for the idea got a lot colder. The San Francisco city council voted to declare the National Rifle Association a domestic terrorist group and is requesting that the federal government do the same.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/nra-sues-san-francisco-declared-terrorist-organization_n_5d7708aae4b06451357367ac

Yeah, suddenly I’m going to be real supportive of red flag laws. looking at the aggression of the city of San Francisco, I’m sure they will not abuse the red flag laws and take away guns from law abiding citizens.

The reality is we need to stop attacking the tools of the mentally ill but focus on the mentally ill themselves. I’ve talked about this in a past podcast. But there is no way to implement gun control and there is no way taking guns away from law abiding citizens is going to end mass shootings. All it is going to do is take away their ability to protect themselves.

 

Maybe They Should Worry More About This

The “leaders” of California are really running this state into the ground and they seem to be doing nothing about it. We have banned straws, banned plastic bags, call manholes “peopleholes,” call felons “justice involved individuals,” have gas prices that are $2 higher than any other state to protect us from climate change and have declared the NRA a terror group.

But we seem to ignore the homeless problem, the drug problem and the diseases that come from it. We already have had bouts of typhus and hepatitis to deal with. Well, we now might have a new problem, leprosy. That’s right, a disease that is only in the worst countries and has been all but eliminated for over a hundred years in the modern world.

According to Dr. Drew Pinsky, we are very close to a bubonic plague outbreak if it has not already out there. Listen to Drew Pinsky:

So, good job California. Keep up the good work.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/51555/nyu-doctor-warns-los-angeles-you-may-be-hit-hank-berrien

 

One of the More Insane Stories of the Week

I had to actually look this story up to verify it wasn’t a joke. And it’s not. It’s just another example of a radical professor and social justice warrior being absolutely insane.

The professor is Magnus Soderlund, an economics professor from the Stockholm School of Economics. He said in a conference last week that there is one way that we could combat climate change: cannibalism. Yep, no kidding. Now, he didn’t mean we should actually go out and kill people. Not that…not yet anyway. He meant we should eat the dead.

He said “conservative” taboos against cannibalism can change over time if people simply tried eating human flesh. Then we could just kill all the cows and their farts will not pollute the air. OK, I made that up because the article did not exactly say why eating dead people would save the earth.

When asked if he would eat human flesh he said, “I feel somewhat hesitant but to not appear overly conservative … I’d have to say … I’d be open to at least tasting it.”

Well, if I had any liberal in me before it’s all gone at the thought I am closed off because I won’t eat a dead person. I won’t eat dog either.

But one can tell that this is an economics professor and not a medical doctor. Apparently there is a protein in human flesh that can kill you. A tribe in Papua New Guinea actually stopped being cannibals because of a disease called Kuru, also known as Laughing Death.

Maybe Prof. SJW should talk to the really educated before he comes up with something insane like that again.

https://nypost.com/2019/09/09/scientist-suggests-eating-human-flesh-to-fight-climate-change/

 

 

 

spacer