Colorado has decided to make a bunch of laws that gives the government the right to take your kids away. I guess the democrats don’t want to run the state anymore.
Domestic terrorism is becoming a big problem. Let’s talk about it.
And the tax slavery of the western states is scaring off business. Why don’t the politicians listen?
News
Here is some news:
- The tariff earthquake continues.
- It has been reported that 50 countries have contacted the United States to make trade deals.
- Those countries include Japan, Israel, the European Union, Vietnam, and South Korea.
- Trump is looking for free trade. He wants American products allowed into foreign states.
- China vows to fight the tariffs to the end. Good.
- The stock market is up 1000 points today.
- Clarity is necessary.
- He tweeted:
- According to reports from Fox News and CBS News, the Supreme Court has granted President Donald Trump’s request to vacate a lower court’s ruling that barred the administration from using the 1798 Alien Enemies Act to deport Venezuelan nationals, including suspected members of the Tren de Aragua gang.
- The Supreme Court’s decision was sharply divided, with a 5-4 split ruling in favor of the Trump administration’s request12.
- While the court allowed the deportations to resume, it also mandated that individuals subject to removal under the Alien Enemies Act must be given notice and an opportunity to challenge their deportation before being removed from the United States13.
- In dissent, the three liberal justices, joined in part by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, criticized the majority’s decision, arguing that it rewarded the government’s attempts to avoid judicial review34.
They Want Your Kids
Colorado is currently considering House Bill 25-1312, known as the “Kelly Loving Act,” which proposes significant legal protections for transgender individuals. The bill aims to address issues such as misgendering, deadnaming, and gender-affirming care, particularly in contexts involving family law, education, and public accommodations.
Key Provisions of HB25-1312
- Misgendering and Deadnaming as Child Abuse:
The bill classifies misgendering (using pronouns inconsistent with someone’s gender identity) and deadnaming (using a person’s birth name rather than their chosen name) as forms of “coercive control” in child custody cases. Courts would consider such actions when determining parental responsibilities and the best interests of the child146. - Anti-Discrimination Protections:
Misgendering and deadnaming would be explicitly defined as discriminatory acts under the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act. This would prohibit such behavior in places of public accommodation, including businesses and schools. Violators could face penalties such as fines or mandatory anti-discrimination training146. - School Policies:
Schools would be required to adopt inclusive policies regarding chosen names and gender-neutral dress codes. They would also need to accommodate any reason a student might use a name different from their legal name356. - Public Entities’ Use of Chosen Names:
Public agencies would be mandated to provide space for both legal names and chosen names on official forms. Once a chosen name is listed, it must be used on all future documentation administered by the agency67. - Parental Rights Protections:
Colorado courts would be prohibited from enforcing out-of-state laws that penalize families for supporting gender-affirming care for minors36.
Criticisms and Concerns
Critics argue that the bill could infringe on free speech rights by compelling individuals to use specific names or pronouns, even if doing so conflicts with personal beliefs. Some opponents also view the classification of misgendering and deadnaming as child abuse as overly broad and potentially harmful to parental rights15. Additionally, concerns have been raised about the administrative burden on public entities required to track chosen names5.
Broader Implications
If passed, HB25-1312 could set a national precedent for transgender protections, reinforcing Colorado’s position as a sanctuary state for gender-diverse individuals37. However, it remains controversial due to its potential impact on free speech, parental rights, and business practices.
The bill is still under consideration in the Colorado legislature, and its final form may include amendments addressing some of these concerns.
This Is Terrorism
https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-pro-life-activist-savannah-craven-beaten-and-bloodied-by-abortion-supporter-during-nyc-street-interview
https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-antifa-attacks-tpusa-tabling-event-featuring-brandon-tatum-at-uc-davis-gear-stolen-and-students-assaulted
They Won’t Listen
Major corporations, including Amazon, Costco, Microsoft, and Nordstrom, are warning Washington state lawmakers that proposed tax increases could lead to a corporate exodus and harm the state’s economic stability. These companies, alongside others such as Alaska Airlines, Zillow, T-Mobile, and Puget Sound Energy, co-signed a letter urging the legislature to reconsider payroll and wealth tax proposals aimed at addressing a significant budget shortfall of $12–16 billion134.
Key Concerns Raised by Businesses
- Economic Impact of Taxes:
- The proposed taxes include a statewide payroll tax modeled after Seattle’s 2020 “JumpStart” tax. This tax would impose a 5% levy on employee wages above the Social Security wage limit for companies with annual payrolls exceeding $7 million2.
- Critics argue that these measures would increase operational costs, making Washington less competitive compared to other regions. For example, it is reportedly 30% cheaper to employ software engineers in Vancouver, Canada, than in the Puget Sound area12.
- Threats to Job Growth:
- Business leaders warned that higher taxes could drive jobs out of the state. Microsoft President Brad Smith highlighted that Amazon has reduced its Seattle workforce by 10,000 jobs since the implementation of the “JumpStart” tax, while adding 25,000 jobs in Bellevue16.
- Smith also pointed to historical examples in Europe where similar wealth taxes were abolished due to negative economic consequences, including job losses16.
- Unsustainable Spending Growth:
- The letter criticized Washington’s spending trends, noting that the state’s operating budget has more than doubled over the past decade, growing by 37% in just the last four years—far outpacing population and income growth13.
- Businesses argued that even without new taxes, existing revenue sources are projected to grow by 6.8% in the 2025–2027 biennium and 7.7% in the following biennium13.
Legislative Context
Democratic lawmakers have floated various revenue measures to address the budget gap, including payroll and business taxes. However, Governor Bob Ferguson has stated he would veto any bill containing a wealth tax due to concerns about its economic impact34. While proponents of these taxes argue they are necessary for funding public services like education and housing, opponents—including Republicans and business leaders—believe spending cuts should be prioritized instead45.
Broader Implications
The business community has warned that these tax proposals could lead to long-term damage to Washington’s economic competitiveness. Companies have already begun shifting jobs to more business-friendly regions like Idaho or British Columbia. Additionally, some wealthy residents have reportedly moved out of Washington to avoid higher taxes23.
In summary, corporate leaders are urging lawmakers to reconsider these tax hikes, emphasizing their potential to undermine entrepreneurship, discourage job creation, and harm economic stability across the state134.