Nancy Pelosi may be skipping church in the future. Is Biden next?

A Democrat in Oklahoma has a great solution for dealing with the outlawing of abortion.

And the Elon Musk saga takes a very expected turn.

Kamalaisms

I have to ask a question. Have politicians always been this stupid or have they just gotten that way over the last few years? Quite honestly, I don’t remember so many stupid people holding so much power.

Here is Kamala Harris talking at a climate conference and she’s talking about how school buses are going electric.

Kamala: “Think about it. Yellow school buses are our nation’s largest form of mass transit. How ‘bout that? Every day — so, yes, and let’s applaud because it gets ‘em where they need to go!”pic.twitter.com/Q6I8WNeRC8

— Daily Wire (@realDailyWire) May 20, 2022

She really thinks about this subject every day? Really? Maybe she should spend more time thinking about the border crisis (which she was in charge of) or the baby formula crisis, or the inflation crisis, or rising gas prices, or the crashing stock market.

Here is another genius, AOC.

AOC on how babies in the womb are not a life: “‘Oh…you’re harming a life, I believe this a life.’ Well, some religions don’t. How about that?”pic.twitter.com/vh555fJ647

— Daily Wire (@realDailyWire) May 20, 2022

Um, I’m pretty sure abortion is not something religious Jews do. Or Christians. Or Muslims. But she was able to string together big words like “theocratic”.

The first time she weighs in on abortion, she makes a complete ass out of herself.

It’s About Time

According to Fox News:

San Francisco Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone announced Friday that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is barred from receiving Holy Communion due to her pro-abortion stance — marking an escalation in a decades-long tension between the Roman Catholic Church and liberal Democratic politicians on abortion.

In a letter he wrote to Pelosi, he said:

This fundamental moral truth has consequences for Catholics in how they live their lives, especially those entrusted with promoting and protecting the public good of society.  Pope St. John Paul II was also quite consistent in upholding this constant teaching of the Church, and frequently reminded us that “those who are directly involved in lawmaking bodies have a ‘grave and clear obligation to oppose’ any law that attacks human life.  For them, as for every Catholic, it is impossible to promote such laws or to vote for them” (cf. Doctrinal Note on some questions regarding the participation of Catholics in political life [November 24, 2002], n. 4, §1).  A Catholic legislator who supports procured abortion, after knowing the teaching of the Church, commits a manifestly grave sin which is a cause of most serious scandal to others.  Therefore, universal Church law provides that such persons “are not to be admitted to Holy Communion” (Code of Canon Law, can. 915).

Later, he writes:

As you have not publically repudiated your position on abortion, and continue to refer to your Catholic faith in justifying your position and to receive Holy Communion, that time has now come.  Therefore, in light of my responsibility as the Archbishop of San Francisco to be “concerned for all the Christian faithful entrusted to [my] care” (Code of Canon Law, can. 383, §1), by means of this communication I am hereby notifying you that you are not to present yourself for Holy Communion and, should you do so, you are not to be admitted to Holy Communion, until such time as you publically repudiate your advocacy for the legitimacy of abortion and confess and receive absolution of this grave sin in the sacrament of Penance.

He concludes:

I also ask all of the faithful of the Archdiocese of San Francisco to pray for all of our legislators, especially Catholic legislators who promote procured abortion, that with the help and under the guidance of the Holy Spirit, they may undergo a conversion of heart in this most grave matter and human life may be protected and fostered in every stage and condition of life.

Finally, someone in the Catholic Church has the balls to pull the trigger on these pro-baby killing “Catholics”. Pope Francis, who is a liberal Pope but has denounced abortion should put more of emphasis on how evil abortion is (Pope Benedict would have). Abortion is becoming way too widespread throughout the world. Heck, it’s now legal in highly Catholic South American countries.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/san-francisco-archbishop-pelosi-communion-abortion-support

Here’s a Good Idea

A Democrat in Oklahoma, which is one of the states that wants to completely ban abortion has come up with an idea that will prevent unwanted pregnancy.

According to the Daily Wire:

At a meeting of the Oklahoma state legislature Friday, Democratic Rep. Mickey Dollens suggested that members of the legislature who supported the abortion law, House Bill 4327, should consider another bill he planned to introduce, which would mandate that young men in the state receive a vasectomy once they reach puberty that could only be reversed when they are “deemed financially and emotionally responsible.”

He tweeted:

 “One of my fellow legislators plans to introduce a bill, HB 4327, that would define life as the moment of fertilization, making it a homicide to abort even a small cluster of cells. What if we take it further and mandate that every male has to have a vasectomy until they are deemed financially and emotionally responsible? Or call the use of condoms premeditated murder? Using a personal interpretation of religion to legislate human bodies is wrong and leads us down a dangerous path.”

This is what the Left does. They conflate the issues. They do not see a line between responsibility and consequence. Now, I know this guy is kidding and he thinks he’s proving some bazar point. But he’s not. He just sounds like an idiot.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/democratic-oklahoma-state-rep-floats-mandatory-vasectomies-for-young-men-after-legislature-passes-abortion-ban?%3Futm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=dwtwitter

That Didn’t Take Long

The Elon Musk saga continues.

• Twitter exploded because Elon Musk decided to buy them and push for free speech.
• Then he announced to the world that between 20-30% of the accounts on Twitter are bots, putting the whole sale in doubt.
• If the deal goes south, this will destroy Twitter. They are already suffering heavy losses in the stock market.
• The Twitter board says they will hold Musk to buying Twitter though, if they have been lying, I don’t know how they can.
• Twitter has fired two of their main managers.
• Elon Mush has said he is going to take the role of CEO of the company.
• He also said he is going to fire thousands of employees (which he should).
• Florida and Texas are courting him to move out of California to their states. Half his company is already in Texas.
• This week he has said he will be voting Republican because Democrats are “hateful”.
• Twenty-four hours after saying he would vote Republican, a sexual harassment claim came out against him (what a shock).
  • This happened six years ago when a woman was offer a horse for an erotic massage on one of Musk’s planes.
  • The woman, who got $250K and had to sign a non-disclosure agreement, did not report the harassment. It was her friend.
  • The woman said she could describe the tattoos and scars on Musk’s penis.
• Musk took it exactly as could be expected.
  • He said the day before that this would happen.
  • He said it was not true.
  • The accuser was a wannabe actress and the money he paid was just cheaper than going to court.
  • He challenged the woman to describe his penis publicly.
  • And, he made a joke. He said this scandal should be called Elongate.

You what the Left is not understanding? They’re BS isn’t working anymore. We all know what they’re going to do before they do it. They’ll just scream sexist, racist, bigot and a variety of phobes. None of this crap is working anymore.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/woman-makes-sexual-misconduct-claim-against-elon-musk
https://nypost.com/2022/05/20/elon-musk-makes-penis-joke-after-alleged-sexual-misconduct/

Go Woke, Go Broke

Netflix is really going all in on the anti-woke thing and it’s all because people are sick of their crap. They have lost 200K subscribers in the first quarter this year, the first time thy have lost subscribers in ten years.

According to the New York Post:

Netflix is canceling several animated projects, including Ibram X. Kendi’s film “Antiracist Baby,” as the streaming service has been forced to cut costs and lay off workers due to dwindling subscriber numbers.

Ava DuVernay’s animated project “Wings of Fire” has also been given the ax, according to Variety, which cited sources as saying that the decision was creative rather than financial.

Netflix recently announced that it was laying off 150 workers, or some 2% of its workforce, after reporting weak earnings in the first quarter of this year.

I have Antiracist Baby and I am going to make a video and read it to you. It is hard to believe that Netflix actually did several videos on this crappy “children’s book”.

All I can tell you is, and everyone is learning this now, if you go woke, you go broke.

https://nypost.com/2022/05/20/netflix-cancels-ibram-x-kendis-animated-movie-antiracist-baby/?utm_medium=SocialFlow&utm_campaign=SocialFlow&utm_source=NYPTwitter

Leave Scooby Alone

Scooby Doo is going woke.

There is going to be a new Scooby Doo but it is going to be missing something. Mainly, Scooby Doo. It will still have Velma, Fred, Shaggy and Daphne. It will be produced by actress and comedian Mindy Kaling who starred in the television show called the Mindy Project. The show will be an adult animated show on HBO Max.

So, not only is there not going to be a dog but it is also going to have a South Asian character play Velma. I don’t think that’s really a big deal but, apparently, Kaling thinks it’s going to be a big deal. She said that people may “freak out” when they see Velma is a South Asia but “she doesn’t care” what people think.

This is the problem with Hollywood. They don’t care about what people think. This is half the problem with movies and television shows right now. That’s why no one watches. This shouldn’t even be an issue of Velma being a South Asian. What should be the issue with the show is that they are taking Scooby Doo out of the Scooby Doo show and leaving the four boring adults instead.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/mindy-kaling-announces-her-scooby-doo-velma-character-is-south-asian-says-if-people-freak-out-about-that-i-dont-care

It might finally be over. Roe versus Wade might be done.

A Momentous Ruling and Sin

A draft of the ruling for Dobbs v. Mississippi (2022) has been leaked by someone at the Supreme Court. It was leaked to Politico, obviously by some activist on the court. We are going to talk about the ruling as it is written and talk about the reactions. Then we are going to talk about the leak and the reactions to the leak.

Believe it or not, we pretty much know where this leak came from.

The Ruling

The best way to go through this is to use the words that Justice Samuel Alito used. So let’s go through the highlights that Politico brought forward.

Some things:

• This is important. Alito is pointing out that abortion was not popular. Most of the country did not want it.
• He also points out that this was a national debate. Roe versus Wade ended that debate.

What he says here is true. Abortion was not a debate when the Constitution was written. It is not part of the Constitution and there is no reference to it anywhere. This is right. The Constitution is a living document but it must go through the amendment process. The courts can’t do that.

Yes, the courts had no right to make up laws.

Again, this is a Federalist, states rights argument. This is correct.

This is really the only argument the Left is pointing to. Stare Decisis is the the belief that a law cannot be overturned because of precedent. This just isn’t the case. There are a lot of precedents that have been overturned because they were bad precedents (Dred Scott would be one of them).

This was a bad precedent.

• Abortion was never in the Constitution.
• Privacy, which the court cited as the reason for abortion, is also not expressly stated in the Constitution.
• The Supreme Court did not have the science in 1973 that we did as early as 1980 with the test tube baby.
• And it was a real stretch to apply privacy to the killing of babies.

This is a long statement but it is right on.

This is exactly correct and I am shocked that this court finally had the guts to say it. This is what people don’t get: This ruling completely ignored the Constitution.

This is a bit of a cowardly statement. The ruling was unconstitutional. He should have said that. If the federal government can’t make a law, the states must determine the laws.

They know now. So let’s talk about how this ruling got released.

White House Response

As you can imagine, everyone on the Left is flipping out.

President Biden, always the unifier, released a statement today:

“We do not know whether this draft is genuine, or whether it reflects the final decision of the Court. With that critical caveat, I want to be clear on three points about the cases before the Supreme Court.

“First, my administration argued strongly before the Court in defense of Roe v. Wade. We said that Roe is based on ‘a long line of precedent recognizing ‘the Fourteenth Amendment’s concept of personal liberty’… against government interference with intensely personal decisions.

“I believe that a woman’s right to choose is fundamental, Roe has been the law of the land for almost fifty years, and basic fairness and the stability of our law demand that it not be overturned.

“I directed my Gender Policy Council and White House Counsel’s Office to prepare options for an Administration response to the continued attack on abortion and reproductive rights, under a variety of possible outcomes in the cases pending before the Supreme Court.

“We will be ready when any ruling is issued.” 

Some things:

• We do know the draft is genuine now. John Roberts said it was.
• They did argue strongly for a precedent that was garbage.
• The “concept” of “personal liberty” was define as privacy by both Roe and Casey. The problem is there is not absolute to privacy. Casey actually said there were no limits to one’s potential actions because “personal liberty” is defined in the 14th amendment. That’s not true.
• Even Ruth Bader Ginsberg said Roe was a trash ruling.

He concluded by saying something that is true:

Biden, on Tuesday, added that if the Supreme Court “does overturn Roe, it will fall on our nation’s elected officials at all levels of government to protect a woman’s right to choose.” 

“And it will fall on voters to elect pro-choice officials this November. At the federal level, we will need more pro-choice Senators and a pro-choice majority in the House to adopt legislation that codifies Roe, which I will work to pass and sign into law.” 

I just want to point something out: 60% of the population believes there should be tight limits on abortion. Most believe that should be during the first trimester or the first twelve weeks. The Mississippi law sets it at 15 weeks.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-supreme-court-leak-womans-right-choose-fundamental

What’s Going to Happen

Let’s talk about what is going to happen here if this holds as the ruling (and I think it will).

• States that want abortion will continue with the abortions. But they will go extreme, supporting abortion to the moment of birth to even after birth.
• States that don’t want abortion will ban it. There are a lot of states that hate abortion.
• By the way, that’s how the government is suppose to work. States have rights and the federal government can only deal with what’s in the Constitution.
• There will be extremes happening:
  • Like I said, states like California and New York will probably support infanticide. The 24 week limit would be gone.
  • States like California will pay for people in other states to come to their state using taxpayer money to get an abortion. California is already proposing this.
  • There will be calls to end the filibuster.
  • There will be calls to pack the Supreme Court.
  • There will be hit pieces on the Conservative justices.
  • There might be protests and riots.
• There will be programs in blue states to get people from red states to move to them. States like California and New York
• What this also is going to do is put abortion on the same path as slavery. A path to its end. I think that’s a good thing.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/leak-of-scotus-draft-on-roe-v-wade-stuns-nation-this-leak-is-the-gravest-most-unforgivable-sin
https://www.dailywire.com/news/shapiro-draft-supreme-court-majority-opinion-leaks-striking-down-roe-v-wade-heres-what-all-of-that-means
https://www.dailywire.com/news/conservatives-call-for-probe-of-scotus-leak-warn-justices-in-jeopardy
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/05/02/supreme-court-abortion-draft-opinion-00029473

The chosen one comes to the White House to save Sleepy, Creepy Joe but it looks like it might have made things worse.

Nature seems to hate environmentalists.

And the most harrowing story, probably of the year, is just being ignored.

Really Pathetic

Joe Biden is really struggling in the polls. The country is a mess, we are verging on a world war and Democrats are looking to get walloped in November. The last time numbers were this bad, Democrats lost 60 seats in the House and Senate.

So Joe has to do something. Or his handlers have to do something. So, they bring back the Chosen One, Barrack Obama. And, boy, were the press excited.

When Obama started his speech, he made a joke. Here it is:

You knew that was coming. Not funny at all. I wish Old Joe was Vice President right now.

They brought Barrack in to sign another executive order about the Affordable Care Act. They also announced they were expanding it. Wow. Expanding something that was done 9 years ago (and it didn’t work well). Is Joe hoping that resurrecting something Obama did by introducing it with Obama is going to improve his standing right now? Is Old Joe completely out of ideas to get himself out of his unpopularity? I have some ideas, give me a call.

Well, it won’t help Old Joe. In fact, it’s probably going to have the opposite effect.

• This set up had a look of desperation. This administration has no idea what to do so bring back Obama so that people get some sweet memories in their minds. Problems is:
  • Obama wasn’t that great a President. Trump beat his Secretary of State.
  • This little get together was way to far before the elections. It will be forgotten.
• Barrack Obama focused on himself the entire time.
  • He said “I” and “me” a total of 33 times.
  • When Obama leaves the White House, we’re just going to see Old Joe and all of the problems will be back.
• There was a huge contrast on the way the speak.
• Barrack Obama was never as popular as the media makes it.
  • Yes, he won every election he ran in.
  • He lost Congress when he was President.
  • He backed with Stacey Abrams and she lost.
  • He backed Terry McAuliffe and he also got killed.

But the worst look came at the end when Biden was walking around alone. No one would talk with him, Obama was ignoring him and he looked lost. He looked like a kid at a party in which he knows no one.

This is so sadpic.twitter.com/pb959HYIQy

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) April 5, 2022

https://www.dailywire.com/news/biden-mocked-over-video-of-white-house-event-literally-no-one-wants-to-talk-to-joe-biden

Even Animals Hate Them

With all the protection of the environment, you’d think nature would like Democrats. Apparently that’s not the case.

A red fox was running around the Congressional building and attacked Democratic representative Ami Bera of California.

Bera said:

“I didn’t see it and all of a sudden I felt something lunge at the back of my leg. I jumped and got my umbrella.”

They eventually caught the fox and took him some place safe.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/felt-something-lunge-fox-attacks-dem-congressman-on-capitol-grounds

Disgusting

A whistleblower in Washington DC turned over the bodies of five aborted fetuses. What is terrifying about this story is it looks like these children were at an age way beyond the legal limits for abortion. It also looks like these babies went through partial birth abortion.

I say, “they look like” because pictures of the babies are online. I wish everyone could see this pictures.

A OB/GYN, Dr. Kendra Kolb, reviewed the pictures and described what she saw.

Baby boy one was is estimated that Baby Boy #1 is about 30-32 weeks, said that Baby Boy #1 “appears to have been delivered mostly intact without evidence of dismemberment, and as such, it is difficult to say how his life was ended.”

A medical professional looking at the photos says of baby girl 1:

“There appears to be an incision at the base of the skull, and the head has been decompressed by removing the brain. This is consistent with an Intact D&E or D&X. If the baby was alive at the start of this procedure, it would be considered a Partial Birth Abortion and would be illegal.”

Kolb agreed that Baby Girl #1 appears to be between 28-30 weeks, noting “evidence of deep lacerations to the posterior neck which presumably correlates to the method of abortion used to end her life.”

A medical profession described baby girl 2:

“She has been dismembered. Her head has been crushed or possibly decompressed using suction inserted through an incision in the skull. Her skin is macerated, and her tissues appear grey, consistent with death prior to the abortion. She appears completely normal and was aborted using the [dilation and evacuation] technique, also known as dismemberment abortion.”

The baby appears to be between 26 to 28 weeks gestation and that this baby was aborted through a dilation and evacuation dismemberment abortion.

Kolb said:

“She has evidence of both dismemberment of her upper extremity, decapitation, and organ evisceration as the result of this unimaginably brutal procedure.”

It is not possible to determine the sex of Baby X since this baby is still intact in the amniotic sac, Aultman said. It’s also difficult to discern the baby’s gestational age, she said, but the baby is “probably in the late 2nd or early 3rd trimester.”

The associate scholar speculated that Baby X may have been born alive in the amniotic sac and left to die.

The medical professional said:

“An Induction method would have been used for the abortion. Unless this baby was injected with a drug designed to kill prior to the abortion, he or she may very well have been born alive and then left to die. Without rupturing the amniotic sac, it would not have been possible to cut the cord to cause fetal death before the abortion.”

Kolb estimated that Baby X is between 28 weeks and gestational age.

Kolb concluded:

“It is important to note that all of these babies appear to be of a “viable” gestational age. which means that had they been delivered alive at their current developmental stage, they would have had a very good chance of survival outside of the womb with appropriate support.”

“It is also important to note that these babies are pain capable at this point in development, and especially those whose lives were ended by a [dilation and evacuation] abortion would be expected to experience excruciating pain during this barbaric procedure.”

The neonatologist added that it is “beyond horrific and devastating for me as a neonatologist to see these images, as these babies are representative of the very same patient population that I care for.”

“To then see these discarded aborted babies, and even try to imagine what they went through during these horrific abortion procedures is infuriating and devastating beyond words.”

Here’s the story:

• Police recovered the fetal remains on Wednesday in the home of 28-year-old Lauren Handy, a member of Progressive Anti-Abortion Uprising (PAAU), a pro-life organization.
• The police, at the sight of the babies, said they appear to be aborted legally so no investigation will be done concerning the corpses.
• Instead, the DC police are investigating the woman who turned the body over. They want to know why she had the babies’ bodies.
• The Washington DC medical examiner refuses to do an autopsy and said the bodies will be incinerated.

Founder of the (PAAU), Terrisa Bukovinac, said:

“We are aware that the Metropolitan Police Department has stated that they do not believe a crime has been committed against these babies under DC law. However, the laws in question are federal laws enforced by the US department of justice.”

Yeah, here’s the thing: the Department of Justice is run by people who love this stuff, support this stuff, hell, even encourage this. Do you think they are going to investigate?

If that doesn’t enrage you enough, here is Assistant Chief of Police, Sean Benedict describing the situation:

If that doesn’t make your blood boil, there’s something wrong with you.

Some things:

• Lauren Handy is a hero.
  • She didn’t bomb an abortion clinic or kill a doctor.
  • She recovered the bodies of dead babies that were probably killed illegally.
  • Don’t think she’s going to plea to this. She’s going to make this public and go through the trial process to show the brutality of abortion.
  • But, like the trial of convicted baby kill Kermit Gosnell, the media will ignore it like they are ignoring this story.
• This asshole described dead babies as “items”. Can you think of anything more inhuman than that?
• How does he know they were aborted in accordance to Washington DC law?
  • Are the Washington DC police doctors?
  • Looking at the pictures, real doctors can’t even tell the sex of one of the babies. The police know better than the doctors?
  • And isn’t it the job of the medical examiner to come to that conclusion?

We cannot survive as a civilization when we see babies discarded like trash and not think twice about it. And, by the way, these are the same people teaching your kids in school.

Today

We’re not done with this story.

The ladies of the Progressive Anti-Abortion Uprising, including Lauren Handy, held a press conference today and it was powerful. It won’t be covered by the press so I’ll give you the highlights here.

Here they is the President of the group describing the discovery of the dead babies who were thrown into a box.

Some things:

• I don’t know what else to say here.
• 114 dead babies thrown into a box.
• On TikTok, you listen to people scream about being traumatized over their pronouns being used. This is real trauma.
• I also want to point out all the stuff we are hearing about Ukraine and how we need to help them. Maybe we should fix ourselves first because this is far more tragic than what’s happening in Ukraine and it’s happening here.

In this clip, the discuss why they think these abortions are illegal.

Listen, I do not doubt the evil of a doctor who kills babies who are a month since conception. I have little doubt a doctor would commit an abortion after the legal time period or would commit an illegal partial-birth abortion.

Here, they discuss their interaction with the police:

Not only did the police not investigate, they didn’t bother to come and get the bodies of the babies until they had warrants to arrest these women.

Question: What’s the point of creating laws if they are going to be ignored by law enforcement.

These women are heroes and this is a story that should really be front page news.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/unsparing-investigation-top-pro-life-group-reacts-after-baby-bodies-recovered-in-d-c
https://www.dailywire.com/news/d-c-authorities-wont-autopsy-recovered-bodies-of-these-aborted-babies-police-are-hiding-barbaric-crimes-pro-lifers-say
https://www.dailywire.com/news/eq-dc-area-waste-facility-swears-it-doesnt-incinerate-fetal-remains-amid-discovery-of-aborted-babies

Let’s get to some news, and there’s a lot of it.

And let’s complete the third part of our abortion talk.

News

Here is some news that happened over the weekend:

• Bob Dole has died in his sleep at the age of 98.
  • War hero.
  • Purple heart award winner.
  • 2-time Bronze Star winner.
  • Presidential Medal of Freedom winner from Bill Clinton.
  • Senator.
  • Presidential candidate.
• Bill de Blasio, who is leaving office in a month, has decided to screw New York as much as possible. He is the first mayor to implement a vax mandate to the private sector.
  • Vaccines for all private sector employees by December 27.
  • Proof of vaccination to go to restaurants, fitness facilities and entertainment facilities for children 5-11.
  • Requires 2 shots, up from 1.
  • This will affect:
    • 45% blacks.
    • 40% whites.
    • 30% Hispanic.
  • Is this Constitutional? This time it might be.
• Afghanistan update according to the New York Times:
  • 22.8 million people, half the country, are facing starvation including 1 million children.
  • The Taliban were providing one meal a day for families. Now they are not guaranteeing that.
  • The economic system is crashing with sanctions from the United States and foreign aid from other nations not coming in.
  •  There is up to 50% unemployment.
  • Crops are failing and animals are starving.
  • The Taliban is having issues keeping power on in the middle of winter.
• Russia, who also has a hypersonic missile, is now planning to invade Ukraine. Yay! This will be another foreign policy issue Biden can f-up.
• The Chicago Public School District (CPS) is changing its signage for restrooms in all schools requiring the schools to adopt signage which no longer is separated into boys’ and girls’ restrooms but rather open to members of both sexes.

Listen to the announcement:

ICYMI: We’re requiring all schools to adopt new signage to make our restrooms more inclusive. This is a big step forward for gender equity for our students and staff. pic.twitter.com/4JPBdd1jQy

— CPS – Chicago Public Schools (@ChiPubSchools) November 30, 2021

I guess Chicago learned nothing from the Louden County School District after a student raped two girls because the restrooms were desegregated.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/breaking-de-blasio-announces-nyc-private-sector-vaccine-mandate-for-all-employees-new-requirements-for-children
https://www.dailywire.com/news/lets-go-brandon-store-opens-in-massachusetts

https://www.dailywire.com/news/who-is-making-these-ridiculous-decisions-chicago-public-schools-blasted-for-eliminating-boys-and-girls-separate-restrooms

Their Sacrament of Abortion is Under Attack

In the last two podcasts, we talked about abortion and the current fight in front of the Supreme Court. What we didn’t talk about was the reaction. Needless to say, it has been really over-the-top. Let’s take  look.

The Protests

There were around 20,000 people protesting at the Supreme Court last week. It was pretty split, a lot of protestors were anti-abortion.

The anti-abortionists basically said the same thing. Parenthood is great and abortion is murder. But, of course, the media covers the pro-abortionist view. Too bad Julie Rikelman, who argued in front of the Supreme Court, never argued any of the points of the protestors:

Some things:

• Women will to jail or die? Really? That didn’t happen when abortion was illegal. That whole urban legend of millions of women dying of back ally abortions never happened.
  • The head of NARAL admitted he made that up (Bernard Nathanson of NARAL).
  • In 1972, there was only 32 deaths due to illegal abortions.
  • Turns out, when you make something illegal, people don’t do that thing. This is my case for being against drug legalization.
• There is not one restrictive abortion law, including the one in Texas, that criminalizes or penalizes abortion that goes after the woman.

Here’s something better. A bunch of gals decided to get together and take abortion pills to prove their support for abortion. Here’s that little clip:

I don’t know about you and I’m no doctor, but a pill that enacts hormones to push something out of your body that’s naturally in your body sounds like it’s probably not great for your body. These pills don’t even get one high.

I don’t know how many abortion pills these gals took but I hope they took a whole bunch.

Politicians

Nancy Pelosi had something to say about it. I hate putting her clips on because, between her being 80 years old and her dentures, you can barely understand what she’s saying. But I think it’s rich hearing her say anything. Listen:

Some things:

• We’ve already talked about stare decisis and the other arguments, which she doesn’t mention. So, we’ll go past that. By the way, the only argument she brought up was stare decisis.
• This woman is a “Catholic” and has five children. Does she really believe in abortion? Is she really the best speaker for abortion? Could she have political motives to being pro-abortion.
•  I do not want to get a sex-ed lecture from someone who’s pro-abortion.
  • Anti-abortionists take responsibility before you get pregnant!
  • Don’t have sex, use contraception, get married.
  • Get your life together before you do something that will get you pregnant.
  • Personal responsibility is part of the sexual act. I know the Left hates personal responsibility.
  • What anti-abortionists are saying is getting pregnant is a little late. Pregnancy isn’t spread like the cold. We know how it happens and where it comes from. Be responsible then. Once pregnant, the horse is out of the barn.

Here’s Pramila Jayapal, who seems to have become the new leader of The Squad:

Some things:

• For me, Jayapal, who has had an abortion, shows she has no personal responsibility and bad judgement. She should not have a position of power in government.
• Outside of that, she is admitting that the abortion argument is weak.
• The back ally abortion thing is not a thing. It was a lie.

The Media

The media has also had a lot of problems with this. Let’s listen to the genius of The View, Joy Behar.

Some things:

• I love getting lectured from pro-abortionists about sex and how we don’t know anything. The Left has forgotten that sex leads to pregnancy.
• This is why I choose to use contraception over birth control. I think you need to control conception. Birth control controls birth. Abortion is part of that.
• No one is having sex with Joy Behar. She is a disgusting human being and I find it contraception to hear anything about sex coming from her mouth.
• She’s leaving The View. Though they have many idiots on that show, she is the queen idiot and I’ll miss her for comedic reasons.

Then there’s Whoopi Goldberg from The View. 

Some things:

• I have been reliably told by the ladies of The View that men can get pregnant. She just blew her entire argument, right of the bat.
• Also, it doesn’t matter if I’m a man or a women, both, or neither; evil is evil.
  • Slavery was ended by white men.
  • The right to vote was given by men.
• Finally, no one is touching Whoopie Goldberg’s body.

Opinion

Here is a crazy article that goes on to demonize adoption. This is from the New York Times called I Was Adopted. I Know The Trauma It Can Inflict by Elizabeth Spiers. I find this essay disturbing because it is trying to demonize any alternative to abortion. What is funny about the article is just how insane it is. It makes no sense whatsoever.

It is also one of the most egregious examples of debating from the position of moral authority I have ever seen.

The right likes to suggest that abortion is a traumatic experience for women — a last resort, a painful memory. But adoption is often just as traumatic as the right thinks abortion is, if not more so, as a woman has to relinquish not a lump of cells but a fully formed baby she has lived with for nine months.

I’m a mother myself, to an adorable 6-year-old self-proclaimed Fortnite expert, and as is often the case, I did not know I was pregnant with him until the usual symptoms appeared a few weeks into the pregnancy. As anyone who has gestated a human will tell you, there is a vast difference between the fourth week of pregnancy and the 40th. By the 40th, you’re familiar with your baby’s regular rhythms of kicking and moving. When I awoke, my son would wake up shortly after and I’d feel him turning and stretching, or less pleasantly, jamming his precious little foot into what felt like my cervix. This is one of the paradoxes of pregnancy: Something alien is usurping your body and sapping you of nutrition and energy, but you’re programmed to gleefully enable it and you become desperately protective of it. It’s a kind of biological brainwashing. And this often happens whether you want to be a parent or not.

Justice Barrett is well aware of the kind of biological brainwashing that occurs during pregnancy; she gave birth to five children. And yet she blithely seems to assume that a mother can simply choose not to bond with the child she’s gestating solely on the basis that she is not ready to be a mother or believes that she is unable to provide for the child. She assumes that the mother will be supported financially and otherwise, throughout the pregnancy, even in a country where maternal mortality statistics are abysmal. And she assumes that children surrendered for adoption will find a home, and not a bed in the foster care system. She probably assumes these things because she cannot fathom being in this position herself. These are assumptions that stem from the privilege of being financially secure, having never needed an abortion, and perhaps the assumption that women who do have done something wrong and must face the consequences.

In my experience, some on the right believe that the trauma adoption inflicts is a consequence of irresponsibility. But unexpected pregnancy is not a de facto function of bad decision making. It can be a failure of contraception, the product of a rape, a mistaken belief that a woman is infertile. There is no justifiable reason to inflict harm on women and the babies they might produce in any of these situations, regardless of judgment.

What Justice Barrett and others are suggesting women do in lieu of abortion is not a small thing. It is life changing, irrevocable, and not to be taken lightly. It often causes trauma, even when things work out, and it’s a disservice to adoptees and their families, biological and adopted, to pretend otherwise in service of a neat political narrative.

We went through the Mississippi 15-week abortion limits, Roe versus Wade and Planned Parenthood versus Casey. Now, let’s look at the arguments from this week’s Dobbs versus Jackson’s Women Health Organization.

The Arguments

I struggled to figure out how to format this whole thing and I decided to focus on the arguments of the lawyers rather than all of the questions from the Justices, though we will look at a couple of the questions and comments. This is because we can get an idea on how they are going to rule and we can see who is an activist on the court and who is actually looking at the precedents.

Now, please understand something. I am biased. I am very anti-abortion.

Argument to Overturn Roe and Casey

The lawyer arguing for the Mississippi law that bans abortion after 15 weeks is the Mississippi Solicitor General, Scott Stuart. Let’s listen to his opening:

Some things:

1. The statements in the beginning where he says the damage that Roe and Casey have done are correct though they aren’t the first cases that did this. But, the cases are damaging because of the deaths they have caused over the last 50 years.
2. This is an interesting point he brings up. There seems to be this belief that if a woman is in mortal danger by giving birth, she still can’t get an abortion. This is hogwash and always has been.
   • The mother’s life has always been more important than the fetus’s life. Abortion has always been permissible.
   • Even conservative religions like Catholicism and Judaism believe this and permit abortion when the mother’s life is in danger.
3.  All of this is true.
   • • We know for a fact that the baby is a human being at conception.
     • We know that abortion is both psychologically, emotionally and physically damaging to the woman. We just have to look at Kermit Gosnell to know this. Many of his patients were left sterile and a few died.
     • The process of abortion is brutal.
       • The doctor poisons the fetus.
       • Sucks out the brain to collapse the skull.
       • The cuts the fetus into pieces and then sucks out the pieces. This is also a major cause for infection within the woman.
4. This is a very important point.
   • • • • The idea with the Constitution is that decisions like this is left to the people of the state unless it is directly mentioned in the Constitution.
         • Abortion is not mentioned, at all, in the Constitution.
         • Privacy, which is what Roe rides on, is not mentioned in the Constitution.
         • Therefore, it should be up to the people of the state to make the decision on whether abortion is legal, restricted or illegal.
         • I also liked the way he argued for the rights of the fetus and killing the fetus violates his rights to due process and “life, liberty and pursuit of happiness”.
5. This is also the great lie of the Left. If Roe and Casey are overturned, abortion will not be banned throughout the country. Quite the opposite for certain states like California, New York or Virginia. Abortion will probably be expanded. In those states you might be able to abort a kid after it is born.

One thing he does not mention in “women’s rights”. This is not an accident. It is not a right if that right harms another. In his argument, he makes very clear the humanity of the baby though I would have liked him to make a more scientific argument (though I am sure that is in his written brief and he only has two minutes for oral arguments).

Argument to Keep Roe and Casey

The respondent is Julie Rikelman who is the Senior Director of the Center for Reproductive Rights. Let’s Listen to her opening:

Some things:

1. Her first premise is way off here.
   1. The viability standard is a subjective, non-scientific standard. There are children that have survived outside the womb over a month before the viability standard.
   2. The problem with the precedent is that it was unconstitutional.
   3. The forcing of women to “remain pregnant and force birth” is a false argument. The choice was when they decided to have sex and get pregnant. Nothing was being done against their will while getting pregnant.
2. Stare Decisis is a weak argument.
   1. Stare decisis is defined is Latin for “to stand by things decided.” In short, it is the doctrine of precedent. Courts cite to stare decisis when an issue has been previously brought to the court and a ruling already issued. … Horizontal stare decisis refers to a court adhering to its own precedent.
   2. There have been plenty of precedents overturned in spite of stare decisis including Dread Scott to end Jim Crow laws. Why? Because they were evil and previous court cases were wrong which allowed the evil to continue.
   3. But I would say this is her strongest case.
   4. I also want to point out that she talked about “liberty” throughout her argument and not “privacy”. That’s because that is the wording of Section 1 of the XIV Amendment and she knows she has a bunch of textualists in the court.
   5. If it’s wrong, it’s wrong and how long a bad precedent has been around is irrelevant.
3. The argument against this is simple:
   1. Roe and Casey weren’t right. They’re wrong morally, legally and scientifically.
   2. Again, the state is not taking anyone’s liberty away. It’s restoring the liberty of the baby.
   3. Abortion also has physical and emotional risks. Abortion is not safe, especially for the human being who is being terminated.
   4. I love the talk of consequences. Right now, consequences are on the federal government. By overturning Roe and Casey, consequences shift to the woman and man to take responsibility not to get pregnant.
   5. Again:
      1. Not a right when it violates the rights of another (in this case, the fetus).
      2. Not a Constitutional right because it’s not in the Constitution, which is why Roe and Casey are bad precedents.
4. Propel women backwards?
   1. Everyone’s a victim. Women, poor women, she didn’t say women of color probably because Margaret Sanger of Planned Parenthood was a racist and a eugenicist and that would have opened a can of worms.
   2. What about the baby? Dead is pretty backwards. Notice, the baby is not one of her victims.
   3. Here’s something: Responsibility and consequences for bad decisions does sometimes suck.

Notice she doesn’t address something in this entire argument. She never denies that the fetus is a human being. She arguing about the viability of that human being and that should be the basis of the court’s decision. You hear during abortion protests that the fetus is just a clump of cells. Rikelman doesn’t say that. That does not make for a good argument when your opponent is arguing you’re killing a human being.

In fact, she doesn’t mention the fetus at all in her argument. It’s all women’s rights crap. The fetus is a human being. It is a human being at conception. Rikelman doesn’t argue that. This is the problem with the pro-abortion crowd. They can’t argue any of the facts. She did nothing to convince me of anything.

The Justices

Here’s Clarence Thomas asking Rikelman about what argument she’s trying to make.

Some things:

• Thomas scored a huge hit on Rikelman.
• Rikelman seems to be trying to rewrite Roe.
• Roe was about privacy, not liberty. This is a problem for her because justices like Thomas may see the precedent as invalid since the XIV Amendment does not mention privacy.
• Instead of saying, “I don’t know,” she goes on about liberty as if it means privacy.
• She has no answer.

Here’s Justice Sotomayor making an insane comparison and expecting Stuart to answer to insanity.

Some things here:

• I used to think you had to be smart to be on the Supreme Court. I have been corrected. This is an insane assertion. Or just an assertion of the truly stupid.
• Brain death is degenerative and will lead to…wait for it…death.
• A fetus is a developing person. In fact, a human being’s brain develops until the age of 25 when their prefrontal cortex is, finally, fully developed. That’s why people do stupid things at 21.
• Sotomayor has shown herself as a biased, activist judge.
• There is no reason for Stuart to take any of her question seriously. She has already made her choice.
• This also shows how these judges, like Ruth Bader Ginsburg, feel that the Constitution can be manipulated.

But, Sotomayor continues with her stupidity, totally missing what her job is. I can’t believe this broad in on the Supreme Court for the rest of her life:

Some things:

• Um…what?
• She has been appointed to the Supreme Court for life so she would be immune to public opinion and politics.
  • Read the Constitution.
  • Read The Federalist Papers.
  • She should be impeached from the court because she believes this.
• Casey and Roe, which is what Stuart argues, were create because of popular opinion and politics. That shouldn’t have happened.
• One thing I want to point out: She muddies the waters between the rights that are actually guaranteed by the Constitution and rights that are permitted by precedence. That is a huge mistake.
  • The only rights that are guaranteed are the ones through the Constitution. These are divine and God-given.
  • Rights through precedence are not rights. They are law that can be overturned.
  • If you want a right to be guaranteed, to be defined as God-given, we must go through the amendment process.
  • Abortion would never make it through the amendment process. It’s been tried.
• This just shows we need term limits for Supreme Court Justices.

Here is Sotomayer continuing to be an idiot. This time, she not only denigrates Stuart’s argument but insults 80% of the United States. So much for giving a crap what the people think.

Some things:

• I love this question. It shows the Left for what they are.
• First off, Stuart made reasonable, moral argument. He never said anything about religion.
• Second, debates about life, philosophically, which is what Sotomayor wants to focus on, does not change the science. That’s telling about how she is going to rule. She’s ignoring the science, which is absolute, and bringing it to a philosophical question, which isn’t. Science says, life starts at conception. Philosophy, at this point, is not even a question. It’s not even a debating point.
• Stuart never made a religious or philosophical argument. It is a scientific argument based on decades of research. That’s why he’s so thrown off at the question.
• It is actually Rikelman that makes the philosophical argument that is based on what we knew in 1993 with Casey.
• Outside of the fact this is a smack at religion (in this case, Judaism, Christianity and Islam, which all ban abortion) it equates religion with morality.
• And, it pushes law away from morality which law has a very iffy relationship with morality anyway.
• Unfortunately, I could only answer these questions with questions because this is an insane question:
  • Is all morality based on religion?
  •  If so, with that fictitious separation of Church and State from that misread letter by Thomas Jefferson, does that mean law needs to be completely separated from morality?
• Of course, neither is correct. If so, one could make murder arguably legal because those against murder could be see as moral and, therefore, religious. And we have separation of church and state.
• This question has not been criticized enough. It’s an insane question.

Not the end of insanity when it comes to religion.

Here is Justice Stephen Breyer asking Stuart what atheists have said abortion is bad.

Some things:

• Philosopher and bioethicists? Is this f-ing guy kidding?
• Stuart is basing everything on actual science. Not ethics, not philosophy.

But let’s look at a couple of atheists who touted morality.

How about Friedrich Nietzsche. A humanist. When he said, “God is Dead” in The Gay Science, he wasn’t celebrating God being dead. He was lamenting it. He thought man needed religious morality to keep him from being tyrannical which would have led to the deaths of people.

What other philosopher believed in morality, not necessarily, religious morality? Albert Camus, the Absurdist who broke away from Jean Paul Sartre’s Existentialism. In The Stranger, he said we still have moral responsibility even though there is no moral bounds created by religion.

But, the reality is, Stuart made a scientific argument. He made a Constitutional argument. Religion had nothing to do with it.

Here is Clarence Thomas bringing things back to reality. What’s the law? What is it in the Constitution that makes your summation right?

Some things:

• Thomas is looking for words.
• She has none. She keeps throwing out keywords Thomas might like. One of the words she doesn’t throw out is “privacy”.
• This is weak tea.

Thomas keeps pushing and he shows how lacking the pro-abortion attorney is in knowledge.

Some things:

• Typical Leftist response.
• Thomas asks a specific question. “What Constitution says abortion is Constitutional?”
• Rikelman gives a long-winded word-salad that does not answer his question.
• Thomas, in a few words, rephrases her answer. Is abortion the Constitution guarantees?
• She gives a long worded that abortion is the guarantee in the Constitution.
• Here’s the problem for the pro-abortion litigant: Abortion is not defined in the Constitution.
• There would be no reason for Roe or Casey if it was. I’m sire she’s kicking herself in the ass right now.

So, What’s Next?

https://www.dailywire.com/news/how-dare-you-talk-about-what-a-fetus-wants-whoopi-goldberg-unloads-on-supreme-court-over-abortion-case
https://www.dailywire.com/news/germany-announces-lockdown-for-unvaccinated-people
https://www.dailywire.com/news/justice-sotomayor-compares-unborn-babies-to-braindead-people-reacting-to-stimuli
https://www.dailywire.com/news/clarence-thomas-what-specific-right-is-in-the-constitution-that-allows-abortion
https://www.dailywire.com/news/justice-kavanaugh-at-abortion-case-arguments-why-should-this-court-be-the-arbiter-rather-than-congress-states-the-people
https://www.dailywire.com/news/justice-alito-questions-viability-standard-in-monumental-supreme-court-abortion-case
https://www.dailywire.com/news/pro-abortion-protesters-allegedly-take-abortion-pills-outside-of-supreme-court

https://www.foxnews.com/us/waukesha-parade-suspect-has-long-history-abusing-women
https://www.dailywire.com/news/suspected-waukesha-murderer-was-assessed-top-risk-for-violence-was-released-by-leftist-da-anyway
https://www.dailywire.com/news/waukesha-christmas-parade-suspect-im-being-demonized-dehumanized

Joe’s polls are so bad, he can’t control his sphincter.

California doesn’t get that woke is bad.

And Saturday Night Live gets tacky.

This Just Keeps Getting Worse

A new poll was released on Sunday and the news just keeps getting worse for Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. The main line of the poll is that over 60% of those polled do not want Biden to run in 2024 (if he makes it that far).

The poll is from USA Today and Suffolk University.

Here are the takeaways from the poll:

• “Nearly half of those surveyed, 46%, say Biden has done a worse job as president than they expected, including 16% of those who voted for him. Independents, by 7-1 (44%-6%), say he’s done worse, not better, than they expected.”
• “Nearly two-thirds of Americans, 64%, say they don’t want Biden to run for a second term in 2024. That includes 28% of Democrats.”
• “Vice President Kamala Harris’ approval rating is 28% – even worse than Biden’s. The poll shows that 51% disapprove of the job she’s doing.”
• “If the election were today, those surveyed say, they would vote for their Republican congressional candidate over the Democratic one by 46%-38%, an advantage that would bode well for GOP hopes of gaining a majority in the House and the Senate.”
• 75% believe that the Build Back Better bill would hurt their families.
• A strong majority of Americans, 66%, say that the country is headed in the wrong direction, while only 20% say it is headed in the right direction.

Legendary Democrat strategist James Carville said during an interview last week:

And that is exactly right. People don’t like where the Democrat party is going or all these weird social changes. People don’t like being called racists and stupid for not understanding what the Left is doing. Bill Maher said the same thing this week.

But the Dems and Biden aren’t learning anything. They are suffering from heavy arrogance. They think they need to go harder and faster. They think that not spending trillions of dollars is the reason they lost last Tuesday.

Well, keep it up. Go more Left. Let’s see how that works out for them in a year.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-approval-harris-poll-suffolk-infrastructure
https://www.dailywire.com/news/biden-approval-rating-craters-vast-majority-dont-want-him-to-run-again-harris-approval-in-20s-mainstream-poll

California is Not Getting It

California has decided that math needs to go woke. I think we talked about that in an earlier podcast when we talked about how math is racist. Now, California is going to make math anti-racist.

The plan was to be voted on this month and be implemented in February. It will include:

• Discouraging the concept of gifted students.
• Inject social justice concepts into math including gender theory and inequality.
• Replacing high level classes.

The New York Times reported:

The California guidelines, which are not binding, could overhaul the way many school districts approach math instruction. The draft rejected the idea of naturally gifted children, recommended against shifting certain students into accelerated courses in middle school and tried to promote high-level math courses that could serve as alternatives to calculus, like data science or statistics.

The draft also suggested that math should not be colorblind and that teachers could use lessons to explore social justice — for example, by looking out for gender stereotypes in word problems, or applying math concepts to topics like immigration or inequality. …

Like some of the attempted reforms of decades past, the draft of the California guidelines favored a more conceptual approach to learning: more collaborating and problem solving, less memorizing formulas.

It also promoted something called de-tracking, which keeps students together longer instead of separating high achievers into advanced classes before high school.

This is insane.

The idea for California is student who first realizes he is not good at math just believes he’s not good at math. I know the feeling. I’m not good at math. My son-in-law, great at math. But California believes it can make math more equitable if they just take the math that is hard out of math. There cannot be those people that are good at math and that talent be babied to its ends. We don’t want any of these kids feeding their talents so they can build rockets, launch people into space or invent the greatest electric vehicle.

By the way, do you want to fly in a plane designed with someone who flourished in math due to the equity that was created?

Well, this isn’t going unanswered. The proposed framework has received condemnations from hundreds of STEM field professionals, educators, and public officials who have signed on to an open letter released in July to California Governor Gavin Newsom (D), State Superintendent Tony Thurmond, the State Board of Education, and the Instructional Quality Commission.

The letter stated:

“The proposed framework would, in effect, de-mathematize math. For all the rhetoric in this framework about equity, social justice, environmental care and culturally appropriate pedagogy, there is no realistic hope for a more fair, just, equal and well-stewarded society if our schools uproot long-proven, reliable and highly effective math methods and instead try to build a mathless Brave New World on a foundation of unsound ideology.

“A real champion of equity and justice would want all California’s children to learn actual math — as in arithmetic, algebra, geometry, trigonometry and calculus — not an endless river of new pedagogical fads that effectively distort and displace actual math.”

I’ve said this in the past. Math is objective. Numbers and formulas do not have biases. They don’t care about one’s race or social class. We have gotten a space ship to Pluto (math), took digital pictures (math) and sent them back to Earth (math). We’ve landed on the moon (math). We’ve invented the Internet. You know what computers speak? That’s right, they speak math.

While living your life tomorrow, think of all the things you do and think about how the precision and objective perfection of math affects your life. Think about the things you use on a daily basis and try to figure out if math was necessary to create those tools.

Then think about what we’d be missing if math was retarded in the same way California wants to do.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/california-plan-to-inject-social-justice-into-high-school-math-on-hold-after-backlash
https://www.cde.ca.gov/ci/ma/cf/

Clown Abortion? Really?

Saturday Night Live has gone off the rails. Now the show has not been really funny in a very long time. I stopped watching a long time ago. But they really overstepped this time and I’m not sure it came across the way they wanted it to.

This clip is about the Texas anti-abortion law. They decide to make it funny my bringing in a female clown who made the abortion she had before her 23rd birthday as part of her clown act. Listen to a snippet of it

Goober the Clown
(who had an abortion when she was 23) pic.twitter.com/1rFv6UrPGu

— Saturday Night Live – SNL (@nbcsnl) November 7, 2021

Some things here:

• I’ll just say this right off. The sketch is not funny. It’s not even clever. These “clowns” at the pro-abortion rallies basically say the same thing.
• The laughing of the audience is truly sick.
• We are living in a sick society when over half the country believes that abortion is killing babies and the other half thinks it’s nothing more than a joke.
  • I’m sorry, but there have been 60 million abortions since Roe versus Wade. For people like me, who think abortion is murder, that is genocide is way worse than what the Nazis did. Yet I’m a fascist and Nazi for being against abortion.
  • This is completely one-sided. This doesn’t try to sympathize with the anti-abortionists. And they wonder why their ratings are so down.
  • Louis CK did a great act about abortion. But he took both sides. In fact, he was a tad more sympathetic to the anti-abortion side.
• There was something that I think I caught watching this. I could be wrong because the acting on SNL isn’t really a quality thing. There’s kind of a sadness about her performance. Almost an embarrassment about killing a baby. This doesn’t seem like a celebration but a resignation.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/after-going-woke-nascar-condemns-lets-go-brandon-chant-threatens-to-sue-use-of-slogan-with-its-trademarks-reports
https://www.foxnews.com/media/lets-go-brandon-causes-media-freakout

Is This a Joke?

Yes, it is.

Christmas is coming so you know that the anti-fun Left is going to come out and attack it. We have already heard that Jesus is black. That happened last week. Since no one really knows the color of Jesus because no one cared about that sort of thing back then, we really don’t know the color of Jesus. I’ll go a step further, I really don’t care what the skin tone of Jesus was. He is a little beyond that.

But a judge has already overstepped his bounds. Cobb County Superior Court Chief Judge Robert Leonard has banned the Elf on a Shelf Christmas decoration. If you don’t know what Elf on a Shelf is, it is a Christmas decoration that bends much like the old Gumbys did. It is meant to sit on a shelf and watch your children to make sure they are being good so Santa Clause will give the kids a toy for Christmas instead of coal.

Well, kids probably aren’t getting coal because the cost of energy are too high. Reality is, kids are probably hoping for a piece of coal because heating the home is brutal. Then again, kids might not get a toy because the supply chain crisis is so bad that Santa can’t get resources needed to create the toys. The fact is, the only kids that will be getting toys are the illegal aliens that got $450K for crossing the border illegally. They can afford it.

Anyway, this judge released a statement about the evil little Christmas decorations:

“Tired of living in Elf on the Shelf tyranny? Not looking forward to the Elf forgetting to move and causing your kids emotional distress? I am a public servant and will take the heat for you. My gift to tired parents.

“Inexplicably, Elves sometimes move and don’t move overnight. When those Elves do not move, it leaves our children of tender years in states of extreme emotional distress.”

This anti-Santa, evil judge than released a tweet with a statement with his order:

That bastard.

Guys it was a joke! This is good fun!

https://www.foxnews.com/us/judge-jokingly-bans-elf-on-the-shelf