The hugest, most enormous, most biggest threat to Democracy continues to be pushed by the media and Democratic politicians. Guess what? No one seems to care.
The House of Representatives try to push through a law that should be in the books already. They will probably fail.
And a domestic terrorist has been caught in Las Vegas.
Have Fun in Prison
Paul Hyon Kim, a 36-year-old Las Vegas resident, was arrested on March 27, 2025, in connection with a targeted attack on a Tesla Collision Center in Las Vegas. The incident occurred in the early hours of March 18, when Kim allegedly used Molotov cocktails and a firearm to damage at least five Tesla vehicles, two of which were engulfed in flames. He also spray-painted the word “RESIST” on the facility’s doors and destroyed surveillance cameras with gunfire126.
Kim faces multiple charges at both state and federal levels. State charges include arson, possession of an explosive device, and discharging a firearm into vehicles.
Federally, he is charged with unlawful possession of an unregistered firearm and arson. If convicted, he could face up to 20 years in prison for the federal arson charge and an additional 10 years for the firearm offense146.
Authorities identified Kim through surveillance footage, license plate recognition technology, and DNA evidence collected at the scene. Searches of his residence uncovered firearms, ammunition, clothing matching the suspect’s description, and what appeared to be an escape plan46. The FBI and local police are investigating whether this attack is connected to other recent acts of vandalism targeting Tesla facilities nationwide68.
The motive remains unclear, though officials noted Kim’s possible ties to political or activist groups, but authorities said Kim’s social media activity showed potential links to communist groups and Palestinian causes. The attack is part of a broader wave of violence against Tesla properties linked to CEO Elon Musk’s role in the Trump administration’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)35.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/man-arrested-molotov-cocktail-attack-tesla-shop-las-vegas-federal-charges
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/tesla-arson-suspect-charged-las-vegas/
How Long Is This Going to Last?
President Donald Trump has stated that no one will be fired over the Signal messaging debacle, where sensitive military discussions about strikes on Houthi rebels in Yemen were inadvertently shared with Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic. Trump downplayed the incident, calling it a “glitch” and emphasizing that there was no harm done, as no classified information was shared. He also praised the success of the military operation and defended key figures involved, including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and National Security Adviser Michael Waltz158.
Despite public calls for accountability, including demands from Democrats for resignations or dismissals, Trump has resisted firing anyone. He expressed frustration with media coverage and redirected criticism toward Goldberg and The Atlantic. Trump privately polled advisers about firing Waltz but ultimately decided against it, citing his aversion to repeating past mistakes like the dismissal of former National Security Adviser Mike Flynn in 201768.
The administration’s handling of the incident has sparked criticism over its lack of accountability. Security experts and lawmakers have raised concerns about the use of Signal, a publicly available messaging app, for sensitive discussions, arguing that such lapses undermine operational security and set a troubling precedent18.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/no-accountability-dems-calling-for-hegseths-ouster-trip-over-awol-lloyd-austin?topStoryPosition=undefined
https://www.dailywire.com/news/just-a-witch-hunt-president-trump-says-he-wont-fire-anyone-over-signal-incident?topStoryPosition=undefined
This Should Be Law Already
The U.S. House of Representatives is set to vote again on the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act, a Republican-backed bill that would require voters to provide documentary proof of U.S. citizenship to register for federal elections.
This legislation, if passed, would amend the National Voter Registration Act and impose significant changes on voter registration processes across the country25.
Key Provisions of the SAVE Act
- Proof of Citizenship Requirement: Applicants would need to present documents such as passports or birth certificates when registering to vote or updating their voter information. This requirement would apply to all forms of voter registration, including first-time registrations, address updates, and name changes25.
- Elimination of Online and Mail-In Registration: The bill would mandate in-person submission of citizenship documentation, effectively ending online and mail-in voter registration options5.
- State Compliance: States unable to meet the requirements might have to maintain separate voter rolls for federal and state elections or implement bifurcated systems, as seen in Arizona2.
- Criminal Penalties: Election officials could face penalties for mistakenly registering individuals who fail to meet the documentation requirements2.
Context and Implications
The SAVE Act aligns with recent efforts by President Donald Trump, who signed an executive order on March 25, 2025, requiring proof of citizenship for federal voter registration. The order similarly mandates states to verify voter rolls against federal databases and prohibits counting mail-in ballots received after Election Day136. Both measures have been criticized for potentially disenfranchising millions of voters, particularly those without ready access to required documentation, such as rural residents, women who have changed their names, and low-income individuals58.
Voting rights advocates argue that these measures address a problem that is statistically negligible—noncitizen voting is exceedingly rare and already illegal under federal law. Critics also highlight logistical challenges for states and the lack of federal funding to implement these changes258.
The SAVE Act previously passed the House in 2024 but stalled in the Senate. Its future remains uncertain as it faces potential legal challenges and opposition from Democrats who view it as a restriction on voting rights28.
https://www.ncsl.org/state-legislatures-news/details/9-things-to-know-about-the-proposed-save-act
https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-save-act-an-attempt-to-restrict-voting-rights/
https://www.dailywire.com/news/house-to-again-vote-on-bill-requiring-voters-prove-citizenship
Dumbass of the Day