Episode 526 – Frigging California

Remember that compliment I had for Gavin Newsom last week? Well, California got right back to crazy. Let’s compare California to a smart state.

Darwin’s theory comes to light.

And Kamala can’t seem to get anyone to stay with her.

 

News

Some news:

  • Elon Musk and Twitter could reach a deal for the tech billionaire to buy the social media platform as early as today.
    • Could exceed $46.5 billion.
    • Musk made his offer of $54.20 per share.
    • Twitter and Mush negotiated late into the night and early morning.
    • As I have said before, Musk is going to make Twitter private, fire all the board members and management and open up the platform again.
    • Be prepared for a Trump re-emergence.
    • We will talk more about this tomorrow because Barrack Obama made some comments this weekend which will fit nicely into this story.
  • The soldier is identified as 22-year-old Bishop E. Evans from Arlington, Texas.
    • It was initially reported he rescued a woman. He did not.
    • He rescued two drug mules.
    • His body still has not been found and he’s assumed to have drown.
    • The Biden administration still has not commented on the death.
    • This comes on the eve of Title 42 ending next month.

 

https://www.dailywire.com/news/musk-twitter-could-reach-deal-today-report
https://www.foxnews.com/us/texas-national-guard-releases-pictures-of-soldier-presumed-dead-after-attempting-to-save-migrants

 

Frigging California

California is at it again to make it the most f-ed up state in the country. Let’s take a look at some of their new laws that will convince anyone with an ounce of common sense and morality to move from this craphole state.

 

AB 2223

California is trying to pass a law, AB 2223, that, if read literally, could legalize infanticide for babies up to 30 days after birth. The section in question is 7a of the law. It states:

7(a) Notwithstanding any other law, a person shall not be subject to civil or criminal liability or penalty, or otherwise deprived of their rights, rights under this article, based on their actions or omissions with respect to their pregnancy or actual, potential, or alleged pregnancy outcome, including miscarriage, stillbirth, or abortion, or perinatal death. death due to a pregnancy-related cause.

I have to be honest: I was a little miffed with the language. I do not like what they are pushing but I did not see what was th big issue. I had to do a little research to figure out what was going on.

According to the National Catholic Register:

At issue is one part of the bill, Section 7(a), which reads: “Notwithstanding any other law, a person shall not be subject to civil or criminal liability or penalty, or otherwise deprived of their rights, based on their actions or omissions with respect to their pregnancy or actual, potential, or alleged pregnancy outcome, including miscarriage, stillbirth, or abortion, or perinatal death.”

The bill does not define “perinatal death.” But in response to objections raised by the California Catholic Conference and other groups, Wicks amended the bill to read, “perinatal death due to a pregnancy-related cause,” language pro-lifers say is too vague.

The California Welfare & Institutions Code defines perinatal as “the period from the establishment of pregnancy to one month following delivery.”

I want to point something out. California is not the first state to push infanticide. New York and Virginia have some extremely loose abortion laws. Remember, Virginia governor and black face enthusiast, Ralph Northam said:

So this is nothing new or particularly surprising.

I am not going to go into the immorality of abortion and the California legislators know what they are doing. This isn’t an accident. In fact, I might surprise you. I think this is a good thing. Abortion was suppose to be “safe, legal and rare” and that narrative seemed to be working out for the pro-abortion people. Of course we knew that’s not what they meant. Even Josie thought abortion would be OK in the right situations.

But, as usual, the Left can’t help themselves but go to extremes. This is overboard. It won’t be supported and I doubt its even Constitutional. Let the Left go to these extremes. Like the murders of infants in Washington DC and Philadelphia, this will not be overlooked.

 

AB 2932

Here’s another good one. California is trying to pass a bill, AB-2932 wants to make it that the work week is only four days or 32 hours a week. Anyone who is “forced” to work over 32 hours, or regular hours, has to be paid, by the business, time and a half. The law would apply only to businesses over 500 people. If someone is earning a salary, the salary cannot be dropped, giving the salaried employee a raise.

Way to go California. Way to kick businesses out of California. This is probably not constitutional. But, hey, this is the state that wants to force businesses to put trans people on the boards of companies which, by the way, is unconstitutional.

Assembly member Cristina Garcia was asked about this and she said:

“Well, again, this only applies to companies that have 500 or more employees. This does not apply to small businesses out there. And yes, there might be an increase in salaries you have to pay and that’s not a bad thing.

The reality is that we have a worker shortage, like more than 60 percent of businesses are reporting… their bottom line is already being affected, they’re already struggling.”

By the way, this broad has never run a business. And what’s the unemployment rate in California going to be like when those businesses with 500 or more employees leave California or just shut down?

The California Chamber of Commerce released a statement:

It said the bill “imposes a tremendous cost on employers and includes provisions that are impossible to comply with, exposing businesses to litigation,” and that its “impact on labor costs in California will discourage job growth in the state,” noting that “up to one million jobs may be lost” if it goes into effect.  

Peter Rex, CEO of Rex, a technology, investment, and real estate firm, moved his company from California to Texas three years ago. He said:

 “…California, as a result, is going to continue to lose relative strength and power and competitiveness as an economy and people are going to continue to move out because business leaders like myself are going to move out…”

I need to get out of this state.

https://www.ncregister.com/news/pro-lifers-press-case-against-calif-law-they-claim-decriminalizes-infanticide
https://www.dailywire.com/news/california-lawmakers-propose-4-day-workweek
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB2223

 

Here’s What A Good State Does

Want to know what a real state does?

Tennessee just passed a law in the state senate that would require intoxicated drivers convicted of vehicular homicide to pay child support if the victim of the offense was the parent of a minor child.

The summery of the legislation states:

“if a defendant is convicted of vehicular homicide due to intoxication or aggravated vehicular homicide and the victim of the offense was the parent of a minor child,” then the sentencing court must make the defendant pay “restitution in the form of child maintenance to each of the victim’s children.”

This is common sense legislation that consequences to crimes and give relief to victims.

I don’t have anything else to say about it.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/tennessee-passes-bill-making-drunk-drivers-pay-child-support-if-they-kill-a-parent-of-a-minor

 

Dumbass

According to the Daily Wire:

A Colorado man has died 24 hours after lighting himself on fire in front of the United States Supreme Court on Earth Day as part of what appears to be a religious protest against the use of fossil fuels and in order to bring attention to climate change.

On Friday evening, Washington, D.C., first responders airlifted Wynn Bruce, a 50-year-old climate activist, to a local hospital after he engulfed himself in flames. He later died Saturday evening despite medical efforts to save his life.

Wow.

The article continues:

Those reportedly close to Bruce are emphasizing that he did not consider this to be an act of suicide, rather that he was simply practicing Shambhala Buddhism and viewed the intentional act as one of self-immolation in order to draw attention to the supposedly damaging effects of climate change.

Ok, I have some thoughts.

First, environmentalism is a religion. People who practice it hate all other religions (except Islam). This, like all religions, is a religion of faith. But that faith is cynical. It is faith that the world is going to implode and we are all going to die unless we do something (though what that something is is not definable). So, what they do is just force people to pay attention to it with shock values. They can’t reason their points. They have no solutions (solar and wind? Give me a break).

Second, Darwin was wrong about a lot but he was right about this. The dumbasses will kill themselves. This sounds cruel but, if you’re honest with yourself, you know I’m right. Do you want this dumbass’s DNA in the gene pool.

Ciou to this guy.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/climate-activist-dies-after-lighting-himself-ablaze-on-supreme-court-steps

 

She Gets a Free Aide

Imagine this:

  • You just get out of college with a political science degree.
  • You have no idea what you are going to do with a poly sci degree because they are pretty worthless and you don’t have the grades or LSAT scores to get into law school.
  • You apply to a job your aunt recommended to be a political aide.
  • Turns out that politician is the Vice President of the United States.
  • She accepts you and you are now working for the Vice President of the United States.
  • Great opportunity, right?

Question for you: How bad does it have to be that you would leave your job working for the Vice President of the United States and leave you career options in doubt?

Even if the Vice President is this dope:

Apparently, working with her is pretty bad. Heck, 72% of the population knows that.

According to the Daily Wire:

Tina Flournoy is the latest aide preparing to leave the vice president’s office, per The Washington Post. Flournoy, who has worked for Harris since December 2020, will reportedly be replaced by longtime Democrat operative Lorraine Voles. A dozen Harris advisors have now fled, including her deputy chief of staff, national security advisor, and communications director.

That is her 13th aide that has left. Shouldn’t be a surprise. As Political reported in June of last year:

“In interviews, 22 current and former vice presidential aides, administration officials and associates of Harris and Biden described a tense and at times dour office atmosphere. Aides and allies said Flournoy, in an apparent effort to protect Harris, has instead created an insular environment where ideas are ignored or met with harsh dismissals and decisions are dragged out. Often, they said, she refuses to take responsibility for delicate issues and blames staffers for the negative results that ensue.”

That’s our next President.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/another-kamala-harris-aide-jumps-ship-as-toxic-and-abusive-workplace-narrative-escalates