Zohran Mamdani and other Left wing mayors are suing the Trump administration for narrowing the Public Charge Rule. What’s that? Let’s talk about it.
A woman believes that the Linsey Clancy trial is an example of injustice for some women. You are going to be shocked by what she means by that.
And the Left wing violence continues.
He Wants to Break the United States
According to Fox News:
New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani is suing President Donald Trump’s administration over plans to expand federal authority to deny visa and green card applications based on welfare status.
The lawsuit, filed jointly with NY Attorney General Letitia James, targets the Trump administration’s plan to expand the “public charge” rule, which allows the federal government to deny visa applications based on the likelihood that the applicant will receive public benefits. Trump’s administration seeks to expand the list of benefits that apply under the rule, with the change taking effect Sept. 18.
Some things:
- First off, the changes to the rule that Trump is making are not drastic or unlawful.
- If these immigrants are coming to this country because they could get free things and not become useful citizens of the United States, they shouldn’t be here.
- This is not fair to American citizens who have to pay taxes and get nothing. Why should a useless foreigner take precedence over an American citizen?
- As far as wiping away a century of established law, that’s not true. The rule has changed depending on the President in office and the benefits that were established. The rule has always changed. Mamdani is just lying. Clinton changed it, Bush changed it, Obama changed it, Trump change it the first time, Biden changed it, and Trump changed it again.
- There is never a mention of the New Yorkers that are citizens. They are the ones footing the bill.
- And, there it is, people could die. Well, maybe those people should go back to their country so they can live.
- Notice he comes up with stats as to how disastrous this change would be? That’s all crap. He’s pulling that out of his butt. The data is not need.
Mamdani claimed that up to 4 million people could be forced to unenroll from their healthcare under the new rule out of fear their immigration applications could be denied.
It’s not just healthcare (this law doesn’t apply to children). It applies to welfare and SNAP.
Several major cities and counties across the country are joining New York’s lawsuit, including Chicago, San Francisco, Seattle, Santa Clara County and King County, Mamdani said.
What is the history of this rule:
- The first usage of a version of this rule was around 1694 and was used by the states.
- 1891: Congress expanded immigration exclusions and made some people who became public charges within one year after arrival subject to removal. (Most benefits were local or state. This included Food, fuel, clothing, rent, medical care, or small cash payments delivered to a needy person or family living at home. It also included alms houses, orphanages, schools and hospitals.
- 1903–1917: Federal law developed public-charge bonds, allowing admission in some cases if a financial guarantee was posted to assure that the arriving person would not become dependent on public support.
- 1952: The Immigration and Nationality Act established the core modern formulation: an applicant may be found inadmissible if an officer concludes the person is “likely at any time to become a public charge.”
- 1996: Congress directed officers to consider the applicant’s age, health, family status, assets/resources/financial status, education and skills, and affidavits of support where required—the “totality of the circumstances” factors used in modern decisions.
- 2019: Trump regulation greatly expanded which benefit use could be evaluated.
- 2022: Biden regulation narrowed it