Terrorists are caught in Great Britain. You’ll never guess who they are.
Sunny Hostin has gone full narcissist.
And Hollywood is doing everything they can to normalize evil by destroying great works of literature.
Gee, I Wonder Who Could Have Done It
So what happens when you import millions of military age men who hate your civilization?
According to the Daily Wire:
British authorities arrested five men near a military base hosting U.S. forces early Sunday on suspicion of preparing a terrorist attack.
RAF Fairford, in Gloucestershire in southwestern England, serves as a forward operating location for the U.S. Air Force Global Strike Command and has recently been used to launch B-52 and B-1 bombers targeting Iran.
President Donald Trump praised the arrests while speaking to reporters Sunday and said the United States had worked with British authorities on the case. “The arrest in the UK was fantastic,” he said. “Working with Britain, it was an amazing job. We had them under investigation.” Trump said the suspects were “looking to do big damage” and that the group had been under watch “for a long time.”
Police were alerted around 12:45 a.m. to three suspicious vehicles apparently bound for the base, according to a Metropolitan Police statement. Armed officers responded and detained five men in the nearby village of Whelford on suspicion of explosives offenses, then rearrested them on suspicion of preparing an act of terrorism.
Authorities evacuated about 85 households as a precaution and established a 400-meter cordon around the vehicles while Army bomb disposal specialists were examining them. A nearby recreation center opened to accommodate displaced residents. “We are in the early stages of an investigation, and five men remain in custody,” said Deputy Assistant Commissioner Vicki Evans, Counter Terrorism Policing’s senior national coordinator.
“We continue to work with Gloucestershire Police to keep the community safe as we work to gather evidence from the scene,” Evans added. Gloucestershire Police Assistant Chief Constable Richard Ocone said emergency services had established plans for responding to major incidents.
“A cordon is in place as a precaution and the public can expect to see an emergency services presence in the area for some time,” he said.
A spokesperson for the United States European Command told the Daily Wire, “We are working closely with our UK counterparts to monitor this situation, minimize impacts and ensure the safety of US personnel, their families, and the local community.”
The spokesperson added that the command would not discuss its security posture:
“For operational security reasons we will not discuss specific force protection measures. U.S. European Command remains vigilant and will take appropriate actions to ensure the safety and security of our U.S. service members, civilians, contractors, and their families across the European theater. We constantly assess a variety of factors that determine what measures we institute or modify to protect our installations, our people and their families.”
The New York Post reported that the five suspects were stripped down after officers suspected they might be wearing suicide vests. The Telegraph reported that authorities are investigating whether there is a link to the Iranian regime. In August, Iran threatened to attack U.S. air bases in Europe if President Donald Trump escalated the war. “Should the US go too far, Iran will defend itself at any price, go beyond the region and hit Europe, too,” said a source close to the Iranian regime.
Of course, the UK is trying to hide the fact these are Islamists. Pictures were released before the government had a chance to blur the faces out, so we know what they look like.
The government is also saying not to assume who these people are which means these people are Islamists. They only say not to assume things when they are trying to protect people.
The suspects are believed to be tied with the IRGC and Iran. Of course, Iran denies any knowledge of these guys even though they said they’d start bombing military airports like the one these guys were trying to bomb.
In a continued attempt at suicide of their country, the 5 terrorism suspects are already out on bail.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/british-police-thwart-suspected-terror-plot-near-base-hosting-us-bombers?author=Brecca+Stoll&category=undefined&elementPosition=6&row=3&rowHeadline=Latest+News&rowType=Vertical+Carousel&title=Inside+The+Sinister+Terror+Plot+Targeting+America%E2%80%99s+Most+Powerful+Bombers
https://www.foxnews.com/live-news/trump-iran-war-news-peace-talks-hormuz-september-28
This is Pure Narcissism
By the way, this is why I love AI.
According to Perplexity:
The controversy is about Sunny Hostin’s recent claim that she was the decisive “holdout” juror in the 1991 trial of Daniel Rakowitz, the so-called “Butcher of Tompkins Square Park.” Contemporary reporting and accounts attributed to other jurors conflict with parts of her retelling.nbcnews+1
What Hostin said
On The View in September 2026, Hostin said she had served on Rakowitz’s jury before attending law school and was initially the lone juror favoring a verdict of not criminally responsible by reason of insanity. She described nine days of sequestration, said another juror threw a chair in anger, and said she gradually persuaded the other jurors until the panel unanimously reached the insanity verdict.ew
Rakowitz was tried in the killing, dismemberment, and cannibalization-related case involving his roommate, Monika Beerle. The jury ultimately found him not criminally responsible because of mental illness, resulting in psychiatric commitment rather than a conventional criminal conviction and prison sentence.nbcnews+1
Why it became disputed
The dispute is not mainly whether Hostin was on the jury—reports indicate that she was, under her legal name, Asunción Cummings. The question is whether she was the single, decisive holdout and whether the deliberations unfolded as she described.syracuse+1
| Claim or issue | What the reports say |
|---|---|
| Hostin was a Rakowitz juror | Supported; contemporaneous coverage identified her as a juror under her legal name. syracuse |
| She was the only holdout | Several contemporaneous accounts reportedly described a male, unemployed juror as the principal holdout. foxnews+1 |
| There may have been two holdouts | A contemporaneous Newsday account reportedly said 10 jurors favored conviction while two favored an insanity finding—leaving room for Hostin to have been one of the dissenters, but not necessarily alone. mediaite |
| She converted all 11 other jurors one by one | That is Hostin’s account, but the surviving reports do not clearly substantiate that specific version of events. ew+1 |
| Her 1991 public comments align with the current story | Critics point to reported comments attributed to Hostin at the time suggesting Rakowitz “knew what he was doing,” which appears difficult to reconcile with her current portrayal of herself as firmly committed to the insanity defense throughout deliberations. mediaite |
Hostin’s response
When questioned about the discrepancy, Hostin reportedly maintained: “I was the holdout juror.” The dispute therefore remains a conflict between her current firsthand account and incomplete, inconsistent contemporaneous reporting—not a settled finding that she fabricated jury service or had no role in the insanity verdict.syracuse+1
Bottom line
The strongest cautious summary is: Hostin did serve on the jury, but the claim that she was the sole juror who single-handedly reversed the panel is contested. Archived reports suggest either a different principal holdout or possibly two jurors holding out, which undercuts the clean “11-to-1, then I converted everyone” narrative without definitively proving she was not among the jurors resisting a guilty verdict.
https://www.perplexity.ai/search/70b8e918-1b72-4538-82a4-119720436ddf
They Are All Turning Over In Their Graves
One of the things that bothers me is the rewriting of great works of literature. People who couldn’t come up with their own pieces of work decide to take the classics and twist the stories to meet their own ideologies to the point that the new version is completely devoid of the original premise intended by the author.
One of the things
Let us go over a few of these movies:
- Star Wars
- Snow White
- The Little Mermaid
- 101 Dalmations
- Sleeping Beauty
- The Odyssey
- Animal Farm
- Wuthering Heights
- The Chronicles of Narnia
Now they are doing it with John Steinbeck’s East of Eden.
In the book, one of the main characters is named Cathy Ames. She is pure evil and was meant to be pure evil.
According to Perplexity:
Cathy Ames
The central disruptive force in the novel is Cathy Ames, later known as Kate.
Cathy is portrayed as unusually manipulative, deceitful, and emotionally detached. From childhood she lies and exploits others. She ultimately burns down her parents’ house, killing them, and disappears.
Later she becomes involved with a man who runs a prostitution operation. After attempting to manipulate him, she is severely beaten and left injured near the Trask property.
Adam finds her and becomes fascinated with her. Charles immediately distrusts her.
Adam falls completely in love with Cathy, but his love is largely based on an idealized version of her that does not really exist. He sees goodness and innocence where there is little evidence of either.
Cathy eventually marries Adam, although she repeatedly makes clear that she does not want the life he imagines for them.
At one point, Cathy sleeps with Charles, creating uncertainty about the biological father of the children she will later bear.
This is what John Steinbeck, himself, said about Cathy Ames. I looked this up on Perplexity:
Steinbeck was unusually explicit about Cathy Ames, both in East of Eden itself and in the letters he wrote while composing the novel.
In the novel, he introduces her with one of the starkest descriptions he ever gave a character: “I believe there are monsters born in the world to human parents.” He goes on to suggest that, just as someone can be born with a physical deformity, a person might be born with what he calls a “malformed soul.” Cathy is his example of that idea. SparkNotes
What is interesting, though, is that Steinbeck became less certain about that judgment as the novel progressed. Later he writes, “When I said Cathy was a monster it seemed to me that it was so,” but then says that after examining her more closely, he began to wonder whether that conclusion was really true. eNotes
His private writing shows the same complexity. In Journal of a Novel, the letters he wrote to his editor Pascal Covici while working on East of Eden, Steinbeck described Cathy as “a tremendously powerful force in the book” and repeatedly returned to her with fascination, even referring to her affectionately as his “dear Cathy.”